ChatGPT Creates a Review Article: State of the Art in the Most-Cited Articles on ChatGPT in Health Science, Computer Science, Communication, and Culture, According to Altmetric in Dimensions.ai
Authors: Eduard Petiska
Abstract: We have analyzed all preprints on ChatGPT (N=501) and selected the most influential preprints (according to Altmetric) about ChatGPT across scientific disciplines to provide the most discussed research results about ChatGPT. We prompted ChatGPT to create a structured review article based on them. The results are surprisingly promising, suggesting that the future of creating review articles can lie in ChatGPT.
Tools for this paper
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
We compare the title and abstract with papers indexed in our database. For arXiv papers, we search within the same category; for DOI and other sources, we search across sources and subjects. You can rerun the search as our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.