The co-evolution of strong AGN and central galaxies in different environments

Authors: V. M. Sampaio, A. Aragón-Salamanca, M. R. Merrifield, R. R. de Carvalho, S. Zhou, I. Ferreras

arXiv: 2307.10435v1 - DOI (astro-ph.GA)
13 pages, 11 figures, accepted for publication in the MNRAS
License: CC BY-SA 4.0

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2307.10435v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
This study explores the impact of active galactic nucleus (AGN) feedback on the evolution of central galaxies using a sample of 80,000 SDSS galaxies. The authors analyze the demographics of optically-selected AGN known as Seyferts, considering their internal properties and environment. They find that the dominance of AGN as the primary ionizing mechanism increases with stellar mass, surpassing star formation for galaxies with stellar masses greater than or equal to $10^{11}M_\odot$. The fraction of AGN varies systematically with the star-formation activity of galaxies. Within the blue cloud, this fraction increases as star-formation activity declines, reaching a maximum near the green valley at approximately 17 ± 4%. As galaxies transition into the red sequence, the AGN fraction decreases. These findings provide evidence that AGN feedback plays a crucial role in regulating and suppressing star formation. The study also reveals that Seyfert central galaxies tend to acquire an early-type morphology while still hosting residual star formation. This suggests that regardless of their environment, Seyfert galaxies evolve from late- to early-type morphology before their star formation is completely quenched. Stellar mass influences this morphological transformation: low-mass systems typically emerge from the green valley with an elliptical morphology (T-Type $\sim -2.5 \pm 0.7$), while high-mass counterparts maintain a spiral morphology deeper into the red sequence. In high-stellar-mass centrals, there is an increase in Seyferts from early- to late-type galaxies indicating a potential link between AGN feedback and morphological changes. Furthermore, analysis suggests that AGN are fueled by their own host halo gas reservoirs but when located in group centrals they can also enhance their gas reservoir through interactions with satellite galaxies. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into how AGN feedback influences galaxy evolution and highlights the role of stellar mass and environment in shaping the demographics and morphology of Seyfert galaxies. The findings contribute to our understanding of the interplay between AGN activity, star formation and galaxy properties.
AI-generated keywords: AGN feedback Seyferts stellar mass galaxy evolution environment

AI-generated Key Points

  • Study explores impact of active galactic nucleus (AGN) feedback on central galaxies
  • Sample size of 80,000 SDSS galaxies analyzed
  • AGN dominance as primary ionizing mechanism increases with stellar mass
  • AGN fraction varies systematically with star-formation activity of galaxies
  • AGN feedback plays crucial role in regulating and suppressing star formation
  • Seyfert central galaxies tend to acquire early-type morphology while still hosting residual star formation
  • Stellar mass influences morphological transformation: low-mass systems become elliptical, high-mass systems maintain spiral morphology
  • Potential link between AGN feedback and morphological changes in high-stellar-mass centrals
  • AGN fueled by host halo gas reservoirs, can enhance gas reservoir through interactions with satellite galaxies
  • Insights into how AGN feedback influences galaxy evolution, role of stellar mass and environment in shaping demographics and morphology of Seyfert galaxies
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: We exploit a sample of 80,000 SDSS central galaxies to investigate the effect of AGN feedback on their evolution. We trace the demographics of optically-selected AGN (Seyferts) as a function of their internal properties and environment. We find that the preeminence of AGN as the dominant ionising mechanism increases with stellar mass, overtaking star-formation for galaxies with $M_\text{stellar} \geq 10^{11}M_\odot$. The AGN fraction changes systematically with the galaxies' star-formation activity. Within the blue cloud, this fraction increases as star-formation activity declines, reaching a maximum near the green valley ($\sim 17 \pm 4\%$), followed by a decrease as the galaxies transition into the red sequence. This systematic trend provides evidence that AGN feedback plays a key role in regulating and suppressing star formation. In general, Seyfert central galaxies achieve an early-type morphology while they still host residual star formation. This suggests that, in all environments, the morphology of Seyfert galaxies evolves from late- to early-type before their star formation is fully quenched. Stellar mass plays an important role in this morphological transformation: while low mass systems tend to emerge from the green valley with an elliptical morphology (T-Type $\sim -2.5 \pm 0.7$), their high-mass counterparts maintain a spiral morphology deeper into the red sequence. In high-stellar-mass centrals, the fraction of Seyferts increases from early- to late-type galaxies, indicating that AGN feedback may be linked with the morphology and its transformation. Our analysis further suggests that AGN are fuelled by their own host halo gas reservoir, but when in group centrals can also increase their gas reservoir via interactions with satellite galaxies.

Submitted to arXiv on 19 Jul. 2023

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.