Maximum gravitational mass $M_{\rm TOV}=2.25^{+0.08}_{-0.07}M_\odot$ inferred at about $3\%$ precision with multimessenger data of neutron stars
Authors: Yi-Zhong Fan, Ming-Zhe Han, Jin-Liang Jiang, Dong-Sheng Shao, Shao-Peng Tang
AI-generated Key Points
- The maximal gravitational mass of nonrotating neutron stars ($M_{\rm TOV}$) is a crucial parameter in understanding compact objects.
- Precise bounds on $M_{\rm TOV}$ based on first principles alone are challenging.
- Reliable measurements of neutron star masses and/or radii are leveraged to infer $M_{\rm TOV}$ in this study.
- $M_{\rm TOV}=2.25^{+0.08}_{-0.07}~M_\odot$ with 68.3% credibility is obtained by combining the mass distribution of neutron stars with the reconstruction of the equation of state (EoS) of dense matter.
- Various data sources, including updated neutron star mass measurements, GW170817 data, and PSR J0030+0451 and PSR J0740+6620 data, are utilized.
- Theoretical information from chiral effective theory ($\chi$EFT) and perturbative quantum chromodynamics (pQCD) is incorporated at low and very high energy densities respectively.
- The narrow credible range for $M_{\rm TOV}$ is attributed to pQCD constraints and exclusion by the mass function.
- Three different EoS reconstruction methods lead to almost identical results for $M_{\rm TOV}$, ensuring robustness in the findings.
- The equation of state for neutron star matter is moderately stiff based on this precise evaluation.
- Compact objects detected by second-generation gravitational wave detectors with masses around $\sim 2.5-3 M_\odot$ are most likely lightest black holes rather than neutron stars according to the authors' proposal.
- Combining multiple data sources and theoretical considerations is important for obtaining precise inferences about the maximal gravitational mass of nonrotating neutron stars.
Abstract: The maximal gravitational mass of nonrotating neutron stars ($M_{\rm TOV}$) is one of the key parameters of compact objects and only loose bounds can be set based on the first principle. With reliable measurements of the masses and/or radii of the neutron stars, $M_{\rm TOV}$ can be robustly inferred from either the mass distribution of these objects or the reconstruction of the equation of state (EoS) of the very dense matter. For the first time we take the advantages of both two approaches to have a precise inference of $M_{\rm TOV}=2.25^{+0.08}_{-0.07}~M_\odot$ (68.3% credibility), with the updated neutron star mass measurement sample, the mass-tidal deformability data of GW170817, the mass-radius data of PSR J0030+0451 and PSR J0740+6620, as well as the theoretical information from the chiral effective theory ($\chi$EFT) and perturbative quantum chromodynamics (pQCD) at low and very high energy densities, respectively. This narrow credible range is benefited from the suppression of the high $M_{\rm TOV}$ by the pQCD constraint and the exclusion of the low $M_{\rm TOV}$ by the mass function. Three different EoS reconstruction methods are adopted separately, and the resulting $M_{\rm TOV}$ are found to be almost identical. This precisely evaluated $M_{\rm TOV}$ suggests that the EoS of neutron star matter is just moderately stiff and the $\sim 2.5-3M_\odot$ compact objects detected by the second generation gravitational wave detectors are most likely the lightest black holes.
Tools for this paper
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
We compare the title and abstract with papers indexed in our database. For arXiv papers, we search within the same category; for DOI and other sources, we search across sources and subjects. You can rerun the search as our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.