Maximum gravitational mass $M_{\rm TOV}=2.25^{+0.08}_{-0.07}M_\odot$ inferred at about $3\%$ precision with multimessenger data of neutron stars

Authors: Yi-Zhong Fan, Ming-Zhe Han, Jin-Liang Jiang, Dong-Sheng Shao, Shao-Peng Tang

arXiv: 2309.12644v1 - DOI (astro-ph.HE)
12 pages, 6 figures

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2309.12644v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
The maximal gravitational mass of nonrotating neutron stars ($M_{\rm TOV}$) is a crucial parameter in understanding compact objects. However, setting precise bounds on $M_{\rm TOV}$ based on first principles alone is challenging. In this study, the authors leverage reliable measurements of neutron star masses and/or radii to robustly infer $M_{\rm TOV}$. By combining the mass distribution of these objects with the reconstruction of the equation of state (EoS) of dense matter, they achieve a precise inference of $M_{\rm TOV}=2.25^{+0.08}_{-0.07}~M_\odot$ with 68.3% credibility. To obtain this result, the authors utilize various data sources, including an updated sample of neutron star mass measurements, mass-tidal deformability data from GW170817, and mass-radius data from PSR J0030+0451 and PSR J0740+6620. They also incorporate theoretical information from chiral effective theory ($\chi$EFT) and perturbative quantum chromodynamics (pQCD) at low and very high energy densities respectively. The narrow credible range for $M_{\rm TOV}$ obtained in this study is attributed to two factors. Firstly, the high $M_{\rm TOV}$ values are suppressed by the pQCD constraint derived from theoretical considerations. Secondly, lower values of $M_{\rm TOV}$ are excluded by the mass function. To ensure robustness in their findings, three different EoS reconstruction methods are employed independently leading to almost identical results for $M_{\rm TOV}$. This precise evaluation suggests that the equation of state for neutron star matter is moderately stiff. Furthermore, based on their findings, the authors propose that compact objects detected by second-generation gravitational wave detectors with masses around $\sim 2.5-3 M_\odot$ are most likely lightest black holes rather than neutron stars. Overall this study provides a refined and detailed understanding of the maximal gravitational mass of nonrotating neutron stars highlighting the importance of combining multiple data sources and theoretical considerations to obtain precise inferences.
AI-generated keywords: Neutron Stars Mass Measurements Equation of State Gravitational Wave Detectors Black Holes

AI-generated Key Points

  • The maximal gravitational mass of nonrotating neutron stars ($M_{\rm TOV}$) is a crucial parameter in understanding compact objects.
  • Precise bounds on $M_{\rm TOV}$ based on first principles alone are challenging.
  • Reliable measurements of neutron star masses and/or radii are leveraged to infer $M_{\rm TOV}$ in this study.
  • $M_{\rm TOV}=2.25^{+0.08}_{-0.07}~M_\odot$ with 68.3% credibility is obtained by combining the mass distribution of neutron stars with the reconstruction of the equation of state (EoS) of dense matter.
  • Various data sources, including updated neutron star mass measurements, GW170817 data, and PSR J0030+0451 and PSR J0740+6620 data, are utilized.
  • Theoretical information from chiral effective theory ($\chi$EFT) and perturbative quantum chromodynamics (pQCD) is incorporated at low and very high energy densities respectively.
  • The narrow credible range for $M_{\rm TOV}$ is attributed to pQCD constraints and exclusion by the mass function.
  • Three different EoS reconstruction methods lead to almost identical results for $M_{\rm TOV}$, ensuring robustness in the findings.
  • The equation of state for neutron star matter is moderately stiff based on this precise evaluation.
  • Compact objects detected by second-generation gravitational wave detectors with masses around $\sim 2.5-3 M_\odot$ are most likely lightest black holes rather than neutron stars according to the authors' proposal.
  • Combining multiple data sources and theoretical considerations is important for obtaining precise inferences about the maximal gravitational mass of nonrotating neutron stars.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: The maximal gravitational mass of nonrotating neutron stars ($M_{\rm TOV}$) is one of the key parameters of compact objects and only loose bounds can be set based on the first principle. With reliable measurements of the masses and/or radii of the neutron stars, $M_{\rm TOV}$ can be robustly inferred from either the mass distribution of these objects or the reconstruction of the equation of state (EoS) of the very dense matter. For the first time we take the advantages of both two approaches to have a precise inference of $M_{\rm TOV}=2.25^{+0.08}_{-0.07}~M_\odot$ (68.3% credibility), with the updated neutron star mass measurement sample, the mass-tidal deformability data of GW170817, the mass-radius data of PSR J0030+0451 and PSR J0740+6620, as well as the theoretical information from the chiral effective theory ($\chi$EFT) and perturbative quantum chromodynamics (pQCD) at low and very high energy densities, respectively. This narrow credible range is benefited from the suppression of the high $M_{\rm TOV}$ by the pQCD constraint and the exclusion of the low $M_{\rm TOV}$ by the mass function. Three different EoS reconstruction methods are adopted separately, and the resulting $M_{\rm TOV}$ are found to be almost identical. This precisely evaluated $M_{\rm TOV}$ suggests that the EoS of neutron star matter is just moderately stiff and the $\sim 2.5-3M_\odot$ compact objects detected by the second generation gravitational wave detectors are most likely the lightest black holes.

Submitted to arXiv on 22 Sep. 2023

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.