Augmenting LLMs with Knowledge: A survey on hallucination prevention

Authors: Konstantinos Andriopoulos, Johan Pouwelse

License: CC BY 4.0

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2309.16459v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
In this comprehensive survey, we explore the challenges and limitations faced by augmented large language models. We emphasize the evolving landscape of language generation and stress the critical need for innovative solutions. By examining a wide range of works that enrich Language Models (LMs) with external knowledge, we witness how these models can generate contextually grounded and up-to-date responses. Through the integration of non-parametric modules, these augmented LMs depart from traditional language modeling paradigms and are categorized as augmented language models. While these augmented LMs show promise in reducing hallucinations and incorporating relevant information to enhance context, they still face limitations. Instances of conflicting retrievals leading to mixed answers highlight the ongoing need for refinement in this domain. Furthermore, there is limited exploration of the interplay between reasoning augmentation and knowledge integration, signaling a promising avenue for future research endeavors. Despite these challenges, the field of augmented language models holds immense potential and excitement. It represents a crucial step towards advancing deep learning systems capable of engaging in complex human-machine interactions while minimizing parameter footprint. As we reflect on the progress made in this field, it becomes evident that opportunities for further innovation and investigation abound for those shaping the future of this dynamic domain.
AI-generated keywords: Augmented Language Models Challenges Limitations Knowledge Integration Deep Learning

AI-generated Key Points

  • Challenges and limitations faced by augmented large language models
  • Evolving landscape of language generation and critical need for innovative solutions
  • Enriching Language Models (LMs) with external knowledge to generate contextually grounded responses
  • Integration of non-parametric modules leading to augmented language models
  • Promise in reducing hallucinations and enhancing context, but facing limitations such as conflicting retrievals
  • Limited exploration of the interplay between reasoning augmentation and knowledge integration
  • Immense potential in advancing deep learning systems for complex human-machine interactions while minimizing parameter footprint
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: Large pre-trained language models have demonstrated their proficiency in storing factual knowledge within their parameters and achieving remarkable results when fine-tuned for downstream natural language processing tasks. Nonetheless, their capacity to access and manipulate knowledge with precision remains constrained, resulting in performance disparities on knowledge-intensive tasks when compared to task-specific architectures. Additionally, the challenges of providing provenance for model decisions and maintaining up-to-date world knowledge persist as open research frontiers. To address these limitations, the integration of pre-trained models with differentiable access mechanisms to explicit non-parametric memory emerges as a promising solution. This survey delves into the realm of language models (LMs) augmented with the ability to tap into external knowledge sources, including external knowledge bases and search engines. While adhering to the standard objective of predicting missing tokens, these augmented LMs leverage diverse, possibly non-parametric external modules to augment their contextual processing capabilities, departing from the conventional language modeling paradigm. Through an exploration of current advancements in augmenting large language models with knowledge, this work concludes that this emerging research direction holds the potential to address prevalent issues in traditional LMs, such as hallucinations, un-grounded responses, and scalability challenges.

Submitted to arXiv on 28 Sep. 2023

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.