Take a Step Back: Evoking Reasoning via Abstraction in Large Language Models

Authors: Huaixiu Steven Zheng, Swaroop Mishra, Xinyun Chen, Heng-Tze Cheng, Ed H. Chi, Quoc V Le, Denny Zhou

License: CC BY 4.0

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2310.06117v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
In the paper titled "Take a Step Back: Evoking Reasoning via Abstraction in Large Language Models," the authors present a technique called Step-Back Prompting that aims to improve the complex multi-step reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs). They propose grounding reasoning on abstractions to reduce errors in intermediate reasoning steps. The technique involves deriving high-level concepts and first principles from instances containing specific details, which are then used to guide the reasoning process. The authors conducted experiments using PaLM-2L models and observed significant performance gains on various challenging reasoning-intensive tasks, including STEM, Knowledge QA, and Multi-Hop Reasoning. For example, Step-Back Prompting improved PaLM-2L performance on MMLU Physics and Chemistry by 7% and 11%, TimeQA by 27%, and MuSiQue by 7%. The paper builds upon previous research that showed process supervision with step-by-step verification as a promising approach to improve intermediate reasoning steps' correctness. Techniques like Chain-of-Thought prompting were introduced to produce coherent series of intermediate reasoning steps. However, inspired by human problem solving strategies where individuals often step back and abstract high level concepts and principles to guide their thinking process, the authors propose Step-Back Prompting as an additional method to enhance LLMs' reasoning capabilities. Overall, this paper introduces a simple yet effective technique for improving complex multi-step reasoning in LLMs. The experimental results demonstrate substantial performance gains across various challenging tasks, highlighting the potential of Step-Back Prompting in enhancing LLMs' abilities to follow correct reasoning paths towards solutions.
AI-generated keywords: Step-Back Prompting LLMs Reasoning Abstractions Experiments

AI-generated Key Points

  • Technique called Step-Back Prompting aims to improve complex multi-step reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs)
  • Grounds reasoning on abstractions to reduce errors in intermediate reasoning steps
  • Derives high-level concepts and first principles from instances containing specific details to guide the reasoning process
  • Significant performance gains observed on STEM, Knowledge QA, and Multi-Hop Reasoning tasks using PaLM-2L models
  • Improvements seen in MMLU Physics and Chemistry (7% and 11%), TimeQA (27%), and MuSiQue (7%)
  • Builds upon previous research on process supervision with step-by-step verification and Chain-of-Thought prompting
  • Inspired by human problem-solving strategies of stepping back and abstracting high-level concepts and principles
  • Simple yet effective technique for improving complex multi-step reasoning in LLMs
  • Experimental results demonstrate substantial performance gains across various challenging tasks
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: We present Step-Back Prompting, a simple prompting technique that enables LLMs to do abstractions to derive high-level concepts and first principles from instances containing specific details. Using the concepts and principles to guide the reasoning steps, LLMs significantly improve their abilities in following a correct reasoning path towards the solution. We conduct experiments of Step-Back Prompting with PaLM-2L models and observe substantial performance gains on a wide range of challenging reasoning-intensive tasks including STEM, Knowledge QA, and Multi-Hop Reasoning. For instance, Step-Back Prompting improves PaLM-2L performance on MMLU Physics and Chemistry by 7% and 11%, TimeQA by 27%, and MuSiQue by 7%.

Submitted to arXiv on 09 Oct. 2023

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.