A Zero-Shot Language Agent for Computer Control with Structured Reflection
Authors: Tao Li, Gang Li, Zhiwei Deng, Bryan Wang, Yang Li
AI-generated Key Points
- Challenges faced by agents in autonomously learning and improving computer control without expert traces
- Proposal of a zero-shot agent that plans for executable actions in a partially observed environment
- Agent's iterative progression through tasks by identifying and learning from mistakes through self-reflection and structured thought management
- Evaluation of the zero-shot agent's performance on easy tasks of MiniWoB++
- Outperformance of recent state-of-the-art models with more efficient reasoning
- Comparable performance to prior best models on tasks with higher complexity, despite lack of expert traces or additional screen information
- Promising approach to address limitations of existing models by enabling autonomous learning and improvement without trace examples or external guidance
- Effectiveness of self-reflection and structured thought management in enhancing an agent's ability to perform new tasks autonomously.
Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have shown increasing capacity at planning and executing a high-level goal in a live computer environment (e.g. MiniWoB++). To perform a task, recent works often require a model to learn from trace examples of the task via either supervised learning or few/many-shot prompting. Without these trace examples, it remains a challenge how an agent can autonomously learn and improve its control on a computer, which limits the ability of an agent to perform a new task. We approach this problem with a zero-shot agent that requires no given expert traces. Our agent plans for executable actions on a partially observed environment, and iteratively progresses a task by identifying and learning from its mistakes via self-reflection and structured thought management. On the easy tasks of MiniWoB++, we show that our zero-shot agent often outperforms recent SoTAs, with more efficient reasoning. For tasks with more complexity, our reflective agent performs on par with prior best models, even though previous works had the advantages of accessing expert traces or additional screen information.
Tools for this paper
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
We compare the title and abstract with papers indexed in our database. For arXiv papers, we search within the same category; for DOI and other sources, we search across sources and subjects. You can rerun the search as our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.