Myths and Facts about a Career in Software Testing: A Comparison between Students' Beliefs and Professionals' Experience

Authors: Ronnie de Souza Santos, Luiz Fernando Capretz, Cleyton Magalhaes, Rodrigo Souza

IEEE Software, Volume 40, Issue 5, pp. 76-84. September/October 2023
IEEE Software, Volume 40, Issue 5, pp. 76-84, September/October 2023

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2311.06201v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
In their study "Myths and Facts about a Career in Software Testing: A Comparison between Students' Beliefs and Professionals' Experience," authors Ronnie de Souza Santos, Luiz Fernando Capretz, Cleyton Magalhaes, and Rodrigo Souza examine how undergraduate students view software testing as a potential career. They note that while testing is crucial for software development, it is often seen as an unpopular choice among students in computer science and related fields. This could lead to a shortage of testers in the future. The investigation aims to determine if students' perception of software testing aligns with professionals' actual experience in the industry. The authors argue that a career in software testing can be exciting and rewarding contrary to popular belief. To address this issue and ensure a workforce focused on high-quality software, they stress the importance of collaboration between academia and the software industry. They suggest that both entities should work together to educate students about the significance of software testing in development. This study was published in IEEE Software Volume 40, Issue 5, September/October 2023. The findings offer valuable insights into bridging the gap between student perceptions and professional experiences regarding careers in software testing.
AI-generated keywords: Software Testing Career Choice Perception Collaboration Bridging the Gap

AI-generated Key Points

  • Testing is crucial for software development but often seen as an unpopular career choice among students in computer science and related fields.
  • There could be a shortage of testers in the future due to this perception.
  • The study aims to compare students' perception of software testing with professionals' actual experience in the industry.
  • The authors argue that a career in software testing can be exciting and rewarding contrary to popular belief.
  • Collaboration between academia and the software industry is important to address this issue and ensure a workforce focused on high-quality software.
  • Both entities should work together to educate students about the significance of software testing in development.
  • The study was published in IEEE Software Volume 40, Issue 5, September/October 2023.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: Testing is an indispensable part of software development. However, a career in software testing is reported to be unpopular among students in computer science and related areas. This can potentially create a shortage of testers in the software industry in the future. The question is, whether the perception that undergraduate students have about software testing is accurate and whether it differs from the experience reported by those who work in testing activities in the software development industry. This investigation demonstrates that a career in software testing is more exciting and rewarding, as reported by professionals working in the field, than students may believe. Therefore, in order to guarantee a workforce focused on software quality, the academy and the software industry need to work together to better inform students about software testing and its essential role in software development.

Submitted to arXiv on 10 Nov. 2023

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.