AI summary · arXiv: 2506.01226v3 · eess.SY

React to Surprises: Stable-by-Design Neural Feedback Control and the Youla-REN

Nicholas H. Barbara, Ruigang Wang, Alexandre Megretski, Ian R. Manchester

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 02 Jun. 2025 License: CC BY 4.0

The essentials

  • Investigating parameterizations of stabilizing nonlinear policies for learning-based control
  • Introducing a novel structure based on a nonlinear version of the Youla-Kucera parameterization combined with robust neural networks like the recurrent equilibrium network (REN)
  • Unconstrained parameterizations that can be optimized using first-order methods while ensuring closed-loop stability
  • Addressing challenges such as nonlinear dynamics, partial observation, and incremental closed-loop stability requirements
  • Contracting and Lipschitz Youla parameter leads to contracting and Lipschitz closed loops when combined with either nonlinear dynamics or partial observation
  • Proposal of a weaker condition termed d-tube contraction and Lipschitzness to address incremental stability compromise in the presence of exogenous disturbances
  • Demonstrating that the proposed parameterization covers all contracting and Lipschitz closed loops for specific classes of nonlinear systems
  • Numerical experiments highlighting effectiveness in learning controllers with built-in stability certificates under various scenarios: optimizing "economic" rewards without stabilizing effects, dealing with short training horizons, handling uncertain systems
  • Supported by grants from the Australian Research Council and Google LLC
  • Authors affiliated with prestigious institutions including the Australian Centre for Robotics at The University of Sydney and the Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems at MIT

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Stabilizing Nonlinear Policies

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
In this study, the authors investigate parameterizations of stabilizing nonlinear policies for learning-based control. They introduce a novel structure based on a nonlinear version of the Youla-Kucera parameterization combined with robust neural networks like the recurrent equilibrium network (REN). These parameterizations are unconstrained and can be optimized using first-order methods while ensuring closed-loop stability. The research focuses on addressing challenges such as nonlinear dynamics, partial observation, and incremental closed-loop stability requirements. The authors find that a contracting and Lipschitz Youla parameter leads to contracting and Lipschitz closed loops when combined with either nonlinear dynamics or partial observation. However, when all three factors are considered together, incremental stability may be compromised in the presence of exogenous disturbances. To address this issue, they propose a weaker condition termed d-tube contraction and Lipschitzness. Furthermore, the study demonstrates that the proposed parameterization covers all contracting and Lipschitz closed loops for specific classes of nonlinear systems. Numerical experiments highlight the effectiveness of this approach in learning controllers with built-in stability certificates under various scenarios: (i) optimizing "economic" rewards without stabilizing effects; (ii) dealing with short training horizons; and (iii) handling uncertain systems. The work is supported by grants from the Australian Research Council and Google LLC. The authors are affiliated with prestigious institutions including the Australian Centre for Robotics at The University of Sydney and the Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems at MIT. This research contributes valuable insights into designing stable-by-design neural feedback control systems using advanced parameterization techniques in learning-based control applications.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it
For journalists Premium+ Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.