Taming Uncertainty via Automation: Observing, Analyzing, and Optimizing Agentic AI Systems
Authors: Dany Moshkovich, Sergey Zeltyn
AI-generated Key Points
- Large Language Models (LLMs) are prevalent in agentic systems
- Systems powered by LLMs carry out complex, adaptive workflows using memory, tools, and dynamic planning
- Challenges include probabilistic reasoning, evolving memory states, and flexible execution paths
- Conventional software observability practices are inadequate for these systems
- AgentOps framework is introduced to observe, analyze, optimize, and automate the operation of agentic AI systems
- Framework caters to developers, testers, SREs, and business users at different stages of the system's lifecycle
- Automation Pipeline consists of six stages aimed at enhancing system performance
- Emphasis on automation managing uncertainty within AI systems for safe and adaptive operation
- Automation tames uncertainty rather than eliminating it entirely for improved performance and reliability
Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed within agentic systems-collections of interacting, LLM-powered agents that execute complex, adaptive workflows using memory, tools, and dynamic planning. While enabling powerful new capabilities, these systems also introduce unique forms of uncertainty stemming from probabilistic reasoning, evolving memory states, and fluid execution paths. Traditional software observability and operations practices fall short in addressing these challenges. This paper introduces AgentOps: a comprehensive framework for observing, analyzing, optimizing, and automating operation of agentic AI systems. We identify distinct needs across four key roles-developers, testers, site reliability engineers (SREs), and business users-each of whom engages with the system at different points in its lifecycle. We present the AgentOps Automation Pipeline, a six-stage process encompassing behavior observation, metric collection, issue detection, root cause analysis, optimized recommendations, and runtime automation. Throughout, we emphasize the critical role of automation in managing uncertainty and enabling self-improving AI systems-not by eliminating uncertainty, but by taming it to ensure safe, adaptive, and effective operation.
Tools for this paper
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
We compare the title and abstract with papers indexed in our database. For arXiv papers, we search within the same category; for DOI and other sources, we search across sources and subjects. You can rerun the search as our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.