AI summary · arXiv: quant-ph/0101005v1 · quant-ph

Quantum Communication Complexity (A Survey)

Gilles Brassard

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 01 Jan. 2001 16 pages, LaTeX, no figures. Survey paper License: not stated (all rights reserved)

The essentials

  • Quantum communication is explored as more efficient than classical communication in the survey paper "Quantum Communication Complexity" by Gilles Brassard.
  • Holevo's theorem sets a limit on the amount of classical information that can be transmitted through quantum bits, stating that no more than n bits of classical information can be conveyed using n quantum bits unless parties are entangled.
  • Entanglement allows for twice as many classical bits to be communicated in cases where it is present, but no more.
  • The paper discusses contradictions in distributed computational tasks and scenarios where quantum communication cannot be efficiently simulated using classical methods.
  • Achieving the effects of transmitting quantum bits classically would require an exponentially larger number of bits in extreme cases.
  • Entanglement has the potential to reduce the need for classical communication, making certain distributed tasks feasible if non-communicating parties share prior entanglement.
  • The unique capabilities of entanglement raise questions about accurately simulating them in terms of classical communication.

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Quantum Communication Complexity Gilles Brassard Holevo's theorem Entanglement Distributed Computational Tasks

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
In the survey paper "Quantum Communication Complexity," authored by Gilles Brassard, the concept of quantum communication being more efficient than its classical counterpart is explored. The paper discusses Holevo's theorem, which sets a limit on the amount of classical information that can be transmitted through quantum bits. This theorem states that no more than n bits of classical information can be conveyed using n quantum bits unless the parties involved are entangled. In cases where entanglement is present, twice as many classical bits can be communicated, but no more. The paper also delves into apparent contradictions in distributed computational tasks and highlights scenarios where quantum communication cannot be efficiently simulated using classical methods. It points out that in extreme cases, achieving the effects of transmitting quantum bits classically would require an exponentially larger number of bits. Additionally, the discussion extends to the potential for entanglement to reduce the need for classical communication. While entanglement alone is ineffective for transmitting information, there are instances where distributed tasks that are impossible in a purely classical setting become feasible if non-communicating parties share prior entanglement. This raises questions about the cost of accurately simulating the unique capabilities of entanglement in terms of classical communication. Overall, "Quantum Communication Complexity" provides insights into the intricate relationship between quantum and classical communication methods and sheds light on how entanglement can play a crucial role in certain computational tasks that transcend traditional communication boundaries.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Slides to present it
For journalists Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.