Constraining sterile neutrino cosmologies with strong gravitational lensing observations at redshift z~0.2

Authors: S. Vegetti, G. Despali, M. R. Lovell, W. Enzi

arXiv: 1801.01505v2 - DOI (astro-ph.CO)
Accepted for publication on MNRAS

Abstract: We use the observed amount of subhaloes and line-of-sight dark matter haloes in a sample of 11 gravitational lens systems from the Sloan Lens ACS Survey to constrain the free-streaming properties of the dark matter particles. In particular, we combine the detection of a small-mass dark matter halo by Vegetti et al. 2010 with the non-detections by Vegetti et al. 2014 and compare the derived subhalo and halo mass functions with expectations from cold dark matter (CDM) and resonantly produced sterile neutrino models. We constrain the half-mode mass, i.e. the mass scale at which the linear matter power spectrum is reduced by 50 per cent relatively to the CDM model, to be $\log M_{\rm{hm}} \left[M_\odot\right] < 12.0$ (equivalent thermal relic mass $m_{\rm th} > 0.3$ keV) at the 2$\sigma$ level. This excludes sterile neutrino models with neutrino masses $m_{\rm s} < 0.8$ keV at any value of $L_{\rm 6}$. Our constraints are weaker than currently provided by the number of Milky Way satellites, observations of the 3.5 keV X-ray line, and the Lyman $\alpha$ forest. However, they are more robust than the former as they are less affected by baryonic processes. Moreover, unlike the latter, they are not affected by assumptions on the thermal histories for the intergalactic medium. Gravitational lens systems with higher data quality and higher source and lens redshift are required to obtain tighter constraints.

Submitted to arXiv on 04 Jan. 2018

Explore the paper tree

Click on the tree nodes to be redirected to a given paper and access their summaries and virtual assistant

Also access our AI generated Summaries, or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.