Constraining sterile neutrino cosmologies with strong gravitational lensing observations at redshift z~0.2
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Utilize data from the Sloan Lens ACS Survey
- Investigate free-streaming properties of dark matter particles
- Focus on a sample of 11 gravitational lens systems
- Analyze observed amount of subhaloes and line-of-sight dark matter haloes within these systems
- Combine detection of small-mass dark matter halo reported by Vegetti et al. in 2010 with non-detections reported by Vegetti et al. in 2014
- Compare derived subhalo and halo mass functions with expectations from cold dark matter (CDM) and resonantly produced sterile neutrino models
- Constrain half-mode mass to be $\log M_{\rm{hm}} \left[M_\odot\right] < 12.0$ (equivalent thermal relic mass $m_{\rm th} > 0.3$ keV) at a significance level of 2$\sigma$
- Exclude sterile neutrino models with neutrino masses $m_{\rm s} < 0.8$ keV for any value of $L_{\rm 6}$
- Constraints are weaker compared to other methods such as observations of Milky Way satellites, measurements of the 3.5 keV X-ray line, and studies of the Lyman $\alpha$ forest
- Constraints are more robust as they are less affected by baryonic processes and do not rely on assumptions about thermal histories for intergalactic medium
- Higher data quality, source, and lens redshifts required for tighter constraints in future studies
Authors: S. Vegetti, G. Despali, M. R. Lovell, W. Enzi
Abstract: We use the observed amount of subhaloes and line-of-sight dark matter haloes in a sample of 11 gravitational lens systems from the Sloan Lens ACS Survey to constrain the free-streaming properties of the dark matter particles. In particular, we combine the detection of a small-mass dark matter halo by Vegetti et al. 2010 with the non-detections by Vegetti et al. 2014 and compare the derived subhalo and halo mass functions with expectations from cold dark matter (CDM) and resonantly produced sterile neutrino models. We constrain the half-mode mass, i.e. the mass scale at which the linear matter power spectrum is reduced by 50 per cent relatively to the CDM model, to be $\log M_{\rm{hm}} \left[M_\odot\right] < 12.0$ (equivalent thermal relic mass $m_{\rm th} > 0.3$ keV) at the 2$\sigma$ level. This excludes sterile neutrino models with neutrino masses $m_{\rm s} < 0.8$ keV at any value of $L_{\rm 6}$. Our constraints are weaker than currently provided by the number of Milky Way satellites, observations of the 3.5 keV X-ray line, and the Lyman $\alpha$ forest. However, they are more robust than the former as they are less affected by baryonic processes. Moreover, unlike the latter, they are not affected by assumptions on the thermal histories for the intergalactic medium. Gravitational lens systems with higher data quality and higher source and lens redshift are required to obtain tighter constraints.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.