Cell-to-Cell stochastic fluctuations in apoptotic signaling can decide between life and death

AI-generated keywords: Apoptosis Signaling Stochasticity Homeostasis Cell Fate

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Apoptosis is a crucial cellular process that maintains the balance between life and death in cells.
  • The molecular mechanism of apoptotic signaling and how these two pathways are differentially activated under distinct apoptotic stimuli is poorly understood.
  • A Monte Carlo-based stochastic simulation model was developed to characterize distinct signaling behaviors in the two major pathways of apoptotic signaling using a novel probability distribution-based approach.
  • For weak death signals such as low levels of death ligand Fas (CD95) binding or under stress conditions, the type 2 mitochondrial pathway dominates apoptotic signaling.
  • Signaling in the type 2 pathway is stochastic, where the population average over many cells does not capture the cell-to-cell fluctuations in the time course (~1 - 10 hours) of downstream caspase-3 activation.
  • The probability distribution of caspase-3 activation for the mitochondrial pathway shows a distinct bimodal behavior that can be used to characterize stochastic signaling in type 2 apoptosis.
  • Stochastic fluctuations in apoptosis signaling happen even in the presence of large numbers of signaling molecules, which may be an adaptive mechanism for allowing a competing survival signal to win over a weak death trigger before making critical cell fate decisions and thus minimizing pathologies' risk.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: S. Raychaudhuri, E. Willgohs, T. Nguyen, E. M. Khan, T. Goldkorn

Biophysical Journal, 95:3559-3562 (2008)
arXiv: 0707.1569v1 - DOI (q-bio.MN)
6 pages, 3 figures

Abstract: Apoptosis, or genetically programmed cell death, is a crucial cellular process that maintains the balance between life and death in cells. The precise molecular mechanism of apoptosis signaling and how these two pathways are differentially activated under distinct apoptotic stimuli is poorly understood. We developed a Monte Carlo-based stochastic simulation model that can characterize distinct signaling behaviors in the two major pathways of apoptotic signaling using a novel probability distribution-based approach. Specifically, we show that for a weak death signal, such as low levels of death ligand Fas (CD95) binding or under stress conditions, the type 2 mitochondrial pathway dominates apoptotic signaling. Our results also show signaling in the type 2 pathway is stochastic, where the population average over many cells does not capture the cell-to-cell fluctuations in the time course (~1 - 10 hours) of downstream caspase-3 activation. On the contrary, the probability distribution of caspase-3 activation for the mitochondrial pathway shows a distinct bimodal behavior that can be used to characterize the stochastic signaling in type 2 apoptosis. Interestingly, such stochastic fluctuations in apoptosis signaling happen even in the presence of large numbers of signaling molecules. In a fluctuating environment, such stochasticity in the timecourse of caspase-3 activation may be an adaptive mechanism for allowing a competing survival signal to win over a weak death trigger before the critical cell fate decision is made and thus minimizes the risk of pathologies.

Submitted to arXiv on 11 Jul. 2007

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 0707.1569v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

Apoptosis, or programmed cell death, is a crucial cellular process that maintains the balance between life and death in cells. However, the precise molecular mechanism of apoptotic signaling and how these two pathways are differentially activated under distinct apoptotic stimuli is poorly understood. To address this issue, a team of researchers developed a Monte Carlo-based stochastic simulation model that characterizes distinct signaling behaviors in the two major pathways of apoptotic signaling using a novel probability distribution-based approach. Their findings showed that for weak death signals such as low levels of death ligand Fas (CD95) binding or under stress conditions, the type 2 mitochondrial pathway dominates apoptotic signaling. Interestingly, they also found that signaling in the type 2 pathway is stochastic; where the population average over many cells does not capture the cell-to-cell fluctuations in the time course (~1 - 10 hours) of downstream caspase-3 activation. On the contrary, they discovered that the probability distribution of caspase-3 activation for the mitochondrial pathway shows a distinct bimodal behavior that can be used to characterize stochastic signaling in type 2 apoptosis. Furthermore, their results revealed that such stochastic fluctuations in apoptosis signaling happen even in the presence of large numbers of signaling molecules. In a fluctuating environment, this stochasticity may be an adaptive mechanism for allowing a competing survival signal to win over a weak death trigger before making critical cell fate decisions and thus minimizing pathologies' risk. In conclusion, this study sheds light on how cell-to-cell stochastic fluctuations in apoptotic signaling can decide between life and death. The authors' findings provide valuable insights into understanding apoptosis's molecular mechanisms and its role in maintaining cellular homeostasis.
Created on 22 May. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.