The impact of galaxy selection on the splashback boundaries of galaxy clusters

AI-generated keywords: Splashback boundaries

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • O'Neil et al. investigate the impact of galaxy selection on splashback boundaries of galaxy clusters using the IllustrisTNG simulation.
  • Splashback radius ($R_{\rm sp}$) is measured by analyzing subhalo population density in stacked clusters within specific mass ranges.
  • Various selection criteria are applied, including cuts in subhalo mass, galaxy stellar mass, absolute magnitude, and specific star formation rate.
  • Galaxies with higher masses and luminosities tend to trace smaller splashback radii compared to dark matter radius.
  • Quenched galaxies can be used to reliably reconstruct the dark matter splashback radius.
  • Discrepancies between observational predictions of $R_{\rm sp}$ are attributed to variations in selection functions employed by different studies.
  • Changes in $R_{\rm sp}$ measured through number counts cannot solely be attributed to a change in galaxy abundance inside and outside of the cluster.
  • The study emphasizes the complex nature of splashback boundaries and highlights the importance of considering multiple factors when studying them.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Stephanie O'Neil (MIT), Josh Borrow (MIT), Mark Vogelsberger (MIT), Benedikt Diemer (UMD)

arXiv: 2202.05277v2 - DOI (astro-ph.GA)
18 pages, 18 figures, submitted to MNRAS

Abstract: We explore how the splashback radius ($R_{\rm sp}$) of galaxy clusters, measured using the number density of the subhalo population, changes based on various selection criteria using the IllustrisTNG cosmological galaxy formation simulation. We identify $R_{\rm sp}$ by extracting the steepest radial gradient in a stacked set of clusters in 0.5 dex wide mass bins, with our clusters having halo masses $10^{13} \leq M_{\rm 200, mean} / {\rm M}_\odot \leq 10^{15}$. We apply cuts in subhalo mass, galaxy stellar mass, $i$-band absolute magnitude and specific star formation rate. We find that, generally, galaxies of increasing mass and luminosity trace smaller measured splashback radii relative to the intrinsic dark matter radius. We also show that quenched galaxies may be used to reliably reconstruct the dark matter splashback radius. This trend is likely due to changes in the galaxy population. Additionally, we are able to reconcile different observational predictions that $R_{\rm sp}$ based upon galaxy number counts and dark matter may either align or show significant offset (e.g. those using optically- or SZ-selected clusters) through the selection functions that these studies employ. Finally, we demonstrate that changes in $R_{\rm sp}$ measured through number counts are not due to a simple change in galaxy abundance inside and outside of the cluster.

Submitted to arXiv on 10 Feb. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2202.05277v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their study, O'Neil et al. investigate the impact of galaxy selection on the splashback boundaries of galaxy clusters using the IllustrisTNG cosmological galaxy formation simulation. The splashback radius ($R_{\rm sp}$) is measured by analyzing the number density of the subhalo population in stacked clusters within specific mass ranges. The authors focus on clusters with halo masses ranging from $10^{13} \leq M_{\rm 200, mean} / {\rm M}_\odot \leq 10^{15}$ and apply various selection criteria including cuts in subhalo mass, galaxy stellar mass, $i$-band absolute magnitude, and specific star formation rate. By examining these different criteria, they aim to understand how the measured splashback radius changes relative to the intrinsic dark matter radius. The results show that galaxies with higher masses and luminosities tend to trace smaller splashback radii compared to the dark matter radius. This suggests that changes in the galaxy population play a role in determining the observed trends. Interestingly, the study also reveals that quenched galaxies can be used to reliably reconstruct the dark matter splashback radius. Furthermore, O'Neil et al. address discrepancies between observational predictions of $R_{\rm sp}$ based on galaxy number counts and dark matter measurements. They attribute these differences to variations in selection functions employed by different studies, such as those using optically- or SZ-selected clusters. By considering these selection effects, they are able to reconcile conflicting predictions. The authors demonstrate that changes in $R_{\rm sp}$ measured through number counts cannot be solely attributed to a simple change in galaxy abundance inside and outside of the cluster. This finding highlights the complex nature of splashback boundaries and emphasizes the importance of considering multiple factors when studying them. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into how galaxy selection affects our understanding of splashback boundaries in galaxy clusters. The findings contribute to ongoing efforts to improve our knowledge of the relationship between galaxies and dark matter structures in the universe.
Created on 01 Aug. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.