The impact of galaxy selection on the splashback boundaries of galaxy clusters
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- O'Neil et al. investigate the impact of galaxy selection on splashback boundaries of galaxy clusters using the IllustrisTNG simulation.
- Splashback radius ($R_{\rm sp}$) is measured by analyzing subhalo population density in stacked clusters within specific mass ranges.
- Various selection criteria are applied, including cuts in subhalo mass, galaxy stellar mass, absolute magnitude, and specific star formation rate.
- Galaxies with higher masses and luminosities tend to trace smaller splashback radii compared to dark matter radius.
- Quenched galaxies can be used to reliably reconstruct the dark matter splashback radius.
- Discrepancies between observational predictions of $R_{\rm sp}$ are attributed to variations in selection functions employed by different studies.
- Changes in $R_{\rm sp}$ measured through number counts cannot solely be attributed to a change in galaxy abundance inside and outside of the cluster.
- The study emphasizes the complex nature of splashback boundaries and highlights the importance of considering multiple factors when studying them.
Authors: Stephanie O'Neil (MIT), Josh Borrow (MIT), Mark Vogelsberger (MIT), Benedikt Diemer (UMD)
Abstract: We explore how the splashback radius ($R_{\rm sp}$) of galaxy clusters, measured using the number density of the subhalo population, changes based on various selection criteria using the IllustrisTNG cosmological galaxy formation simulation. We identify $R_{\rm sp}$ by extracting the steepest radial gradient in a stacked set of clusters in 0.5 dex wide mass bins, with our clusters having halo masses $10^{13} \leq M_{\rm 200, mean} / {\rm M}_\odot \leq 10^{15}$. We apply cuts in subhalo mass, galaxy stellar mass, $i$-band absolute magnitude and specific star formation rate. We find that, generally, galaxies of increasing mass and luminosity trace smaller measured splashback radii relative to the intrinsic dark matter radius. We also show that quenched galaxies may be used to reliably reconstruct the dark matter splashback radius. This trend is likely due to changes in the galaxy population. Additionally, we are able to reconcile different observational predictions that $R_{\rm sp}$ based upon galaxy number counts and dark matter may either align or show significant offset (e.g. those using optically- or SZ-selected clusters) through the selection functions that these studies employ. Finally, we demonstrate that changes in $R_{\rm sp}$ measured through number counts are not due to a simple change in galaxy abundance inside and outside of the cluster.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.