Stoic Ethics for Artificial Agents

AI-generated keywords: Stoic Ethics Artificial Agents Utilitarianism Deontology Moral Character

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The paper advocates the use of Stoic philosophy and ethics in the development of ethical AI systems.
  • It contrasts with previous work focused on Utilitarian or Deontological ethical theories.
  • Core Stoic concepts such as the dichotomy of control, four cardinal virtues, ideal Sage, Stoic practices, and perspectives on emotion are explored in relation to ethical AI.
  • The main argument is that internal states of artificial agents should be prioritized over their external actions.
  • Incorporating Stoic principles into AI design can create systems aligned with human values and promote virtuous behavior.
  • Examples are provided for both near-term AI systems and hypothetical superintelligent agents.
  • This paper offers a unique perspective by drawing from Stoic philosophy to build ethical AI.
  • It expands on existing research by emphasizing internal states and moral character rather than solely focusing on external actions.
  • This approach has implications for designing AI systems that align with human values and contribute positively to society.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Gabriel Murray

Final accepted version submitted to Canadian A.I. 2017 conference

Abstract: We present a position paper advocating the notion that Stoic philosophy and ethics can inform the development of ethical A.I. systems. This is in sharp contrast to most work on building ethical A.I., which has focused on Utilitarian or Deontological ethical theories. We relate ethical A.I. to several core Stoic notions, including the dichotomy of control, the four cardinal virtues, the ideal Sage, Stoic practices, and Stoic perspectives on emotion or affect. More generally, we put forward an ethical view of A.I. that focuses more on internal states of the artificial agent rather than on external actions of the agent. We provide examples relating to near-term A.I. systems as well as hypothetical superintelligent agents.

Submitted to arXiv on 09 Jan. 2017

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1701.02388v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the paper "Stoic Ethics for Artificial Agents" by Gabriel Murray, the author presents a position advocating the use of Stoic philosophy and ethics in the development of ethical AI systems. This approach stands in contrast to previous work that has focused on Utilitarian or Deontological ethical theories. The paper explores how ethical AI can be related to core Stoic concepts such as the dichotomy of control, the four cardinal virtues, the ideal Sage, Stoic practices and perspectives on emotion or affect. The main argument put forward is that an ethical view of AI should prioritize internal states of artificial agents rather than their external actions. By incorporating Stoic principles into AI design, developers can create systems that are more aligned with human values and promote virtuous behavior. The paper provides examples which apply these ideas to both near-term AI systems and hypothetical superintelligent agents. Overall, this paper offers a unique perspective on building ethical AI by drawing from Stoic philosophy. It expands on existing research by emphasizing internal states and moral character rather than solely focusing on external actions. This approach has implications for designing AI systems that align with human values and contribute positively to society.
Created on 02 Nov. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.