A census of radio-selected AGN on the COSMOS field and of their FIR properties
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Magliocchetti et al. (2017) conduct a comprehensive census of VLA-COSMOS radio sources using the new catalogue by Laigle et al. (2016)
- They successfully identify 90% of the sources and classify them into active galactic nuclei (AGN) and star-forming galaxies based on radio luminosity
- The AGN sample is complete in terms of radio selection for redshifts below z<3.5
- Out of the 704 identified AGN, 272 have corresponding counterparts in Herschel maps
- More powerful AGN are more likely to exhibit far-infrared (FIR) emission at earlier epochs due to star-forming processes within their host galaxies
- Distinction between FIR-emitting AGN and non-FIR emitters becomes apparent only at lower redshifts (z<1)
- Mid-infrared (MIR) emission is associated with ongoing star formation and smaller, younger, and more radio luminous sources
- X-ray emitters tend to appear in more massive and older galaxies
- Proposed evolutionary track suggests MIR emission in initial phase, followed by sole activity at radio wavelengths and potentially in the X-ray regime
Authors: Manuela Magliocchetti, Paola Popesso, Marcella Brusa, Mara Salvato
Abstract: We use the new catalogue by Laigle et al. (2016) to provide a full census of VLA-COSMOS radio sources. We identify 90% of such sources and sub-divide them into AGN and star-forming galaxies on the basis of their radio luminosity. The AGN sample is COMPLETE with respect to radio selection at all z<3.5. Out of 704 AGN, 272 have a counterpart in the Herschel maps. By exploiting the better statistics of the new sample, we confirm the results of Magliocchetti et al. (2014): the probability for a radio-selected AGN to be detected at FIR wavelengths is both a function of radio luminosity and redshift, whereby powerful sources are more likely FIR emitters at earlier epochs. Such an emission is due to star-forming processes within the host galaxy. FIR emitters and non-FIR emitters only differentiate in the z<1 universe. At higher redshifts they are indistinguishable from each other, as there is no difference between FIR-emitting AGN and star-forming galaxies. Lastly, we focus on radio AGN which show AGN emission at other wavelengths. We find that MIR emission is mainly associated with ongoing star-formation and with sources which are smaller, younger and more radio luminous than the average parent population. X-ray emitters instead preferentially appear in more massive and older galaxies. We can therefore envisage an evolutionary track whereby the first phase of a radio-active AGN and of its host galaxy is associated with MIR emission, while at later stages the source becomes only active at radio wavelengths and possibly also in the X-ray.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.