Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1908.07100v1

In his paper "Alliances and Conflict, or Conflict and Alliances? Appraising the Causal Effect of Alliances on Conflict," Benjamin Campbell challenges the widely accepted notion that military alliances deter aggression. He proposes an endogenous theory of alliances and conflict which synthesizes existing theories of alliance formation and the relationship between alliances and conflict. Campbell argues that alliances may also influence the probability of conflict and be influenced by it. Failing to account for this endogeneity can lead to simplistic theories of alliance politics and hinder our ability to identify causal effects. To test this theory, he uses innovative generalized joint regression models that allow him to endogenize alliance formation on the causal path to conflict. Ultimately, he finds that alliances neither deter nor provoke aggression. This finding has significant implications for our understanding of interstate conflict and alliance politics, challenging traditional assumptions about the role of military alliances in preventing war.

• - Benjamin Campbell challenges the widely accepted notion that military alliances deter aggression
• - He proposes an endogenous theory of alliances and conflict which synthesizes existing theories of alliance formation and the relationship between alliances and conflict
• - Campbell argues that alliances may also influence the probability of conflict and be influenced by it
• - Failing to account for this endogeneity can lead to simplistic theories of alliance politics and hinder our ability to identify causal effects
• - To test this theory, he uses innovative generalized joint regression models that allow him to endogenize alliance formation on the causal path to conflict
• - Ultimately, he finds that alliances neither deter nor provoke aggression
• - This finding has significant implications for our understanding of interstate conflict and alliance politics, challenging traditional assumptions about the role of military alliances in preventing war.

Benjamin Campbell has a new idea about how military alliances work. He thinks that they might not always stop wars from happening. He did some research to test his theory and found out that alliances don't really make a big difference in whether or not there is a war. This is important because it changes what we thought we knew about how countries work together to prevent wars. Definitions- Military alliances: agreements between countries to support each other in case of war - Endogenous theory: an explanation for something that looks at all the different factors that might influence it, instead of just one or two - Conflict: fighting or disagreement between two groups or countries - Causal effects: the way one thing makes another thing happen - Regression models: a way of looking at data to see if there is a relationship between different things

Alliances and Conflict: Appraising the Causal Effect of Alliances on Conflict

In his paper "Alliances and Conflict, or Conflict and Alliances? Appraising the Causal Effect of Alliances on Conflict," Benjamin Campbell challenges the widely accepted notion that military alliances deter aggression. He proposes an endogenous theory of alliances and conflict which synthesizes existing theories of alliance formation and the relationship between alliances and conflict. This article will explore Campbell's research, its implications for our understanding of interstate conflict, as well as how it challenges traditional assumptions about the role of military alliances in preventing war.

The Endogenous Theory of Alliances & Conflict

Campbell's endogenous theory suggests that alliances may influence the probability of conflict while also being influenced by it. Failing to account for this endogeneity can lead to simplistic theories of alliance politics and hinder our ability to identify causal effects. To test this theory, he uses innovative generalized joint regression models that allow him to endogenize alliance formation on the causal path to conflict.

Implications for Understanding Interstate Conflict

Ultimately, Campbell finds that alliances neither deter nor provoke aggression. This finding has significant implications for our understanding of interstate conflict since it suggests that traditional assumptions about military alliances are not necessarily accurate when considering their impact on international relations. In particular, it implies that states should be wary when forming new military partnerships since they may not have a direct effect on reducing potential conflicts with other nations. Additionally, this finding could potentially lead to more nuanced approaches towards foreign policy decisions related to allying with other countries in order to prevent war or promote peace initiatives between them.

Challenging Traditional Assumptions About Military Alliances

This research also challenges traditional assumptions about the role of military alliances in preventing war by suggesting that they do not necessarily have a direct effect on reducing potential conflicts with other nations. Instead, Campbell argues that states should consider alternative strategies such as diplomatic negotiations or economic sanctions when attempting to resolve disputes between them instead relying solely upon military partnerships as a means for achieving peace agreements between two countries or groups involved in a dispute over territory or resources . Furthermore, his findings suggest that states should take into account both internal factors (such as domestic politics) as well external ones (such as regional dynamics) when making decisions regarding foreign policy issues related to allying with another nation-state in order create stability within their region or beyond its borders . Overall , Benjamin Campbell’s paper provides an important contribution towards our understanding of interstate relations by challenging long-held beliefs about how effective military partnerships are at deterring aggression among nations . His research highlights how complex international relations can be , emphasizing why states must carefully consider both internal and external factors before entering into any type of agreement with another country . Ultimately , this paper serves as a reminder why it is essential for diplomats from different countries work together in order foster peaceful resolutions whenever possible rather than resorting immediately militaristic solutions whenever tensions arise between them .