Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1910.00334v1

The existing summary discusses the challenges faced by architects and construction engineers in manually checking models for compliance against building regulations. It emphasizes the need for algorithms that can process information from construction projects and identify non-compliant elements. However, automated code-compliance checking presents several obstacles. One major obstacle is that building regulations are typically published as human-readable texts, which are often ambiguous or incomplete. Additionally, the vocabulary used to express these regulations differs significantly from the vocabularies used in Building Information Models (BIM). This disparity makes it difficult to effectively automate code-compliance checking. Furthermore, the level of detail associated with BIM-contained geometries introduces complexity in calculations. The intricate nature of the Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) standard also hinders automation of IFC processing tasks. These complexities further impede the development of efficient automated checking algorithms. To address these challenges, the authors propose an approach that involves using model charts, formal rules, and pre-processors to translate construction regulations into semantic queries. They demonstrate the usefulness of this approach through several use cases, highlighting how it bridges the gap between regulation texts and automated checking algorithms. Additionally, they mention the recent building ontology BOT recommended by the W3C Linked Building Data Community Group as a potential avenue for standardizing and expanding their approach. In summary, this paper explores difficulties faced in automating code-compliance checking for building regulations and proposes a novel approach that leverages semantic rules to overcome them. The authors argue that their approach represents a significant step forward in bridging the gap between regulation texts and automated checking algorithms. They also discuss future perspectives for standardizing and extending their approach using building ontologies like BOT recommended by W3C Linked Building Data Community Group.

• - Architects and construction engineers face challenges in manually checking models for compliance against building regulations
• - Need for algorithms that can process information from construction projects and identify non-compliant elements
• - Building regulations are often ambiguous or incomplete, making automated code-compliance checking difficult
• - Vocabulary used in building regulations differs significantly from the vocabularies used in Building Information Models (BIM)
• - Level of detail associated with BIM-contained geometries introduces complexity in calculations
• - Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) standard hinders automation of IFC processing tasks
• - Proposed approach involves using model charts, formal rules, and pre-processors to translate construction regulations into semantic queries
• - Demonstrated usefulness of approach through several use cases, bridging the gap between regulation texts and automated checking algorithms
• - Mentioned the recent building ontology BOT recommended by W3C Linked Building Data Community Group as a potential avenue for standardizing and expanding their approach.

Architects and construction engineers have a hard time checking if their models follow the rules for building. They need computer programs that can look at the models and find any parts that don't follow the rules. The rules for building are often unclear or not complete, which makes it even harder to use computers to check them. The words used in the building rules are different from the words used in computer models of buildings. The details in the computer models make it complicated to do calculations. There is a standard called Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) that makes it difficult to automate tasks with computer models of buildings. A new approach suggests using charts, rules, and special programs to translate the building rules into questions that computers can understand. This approach has been tested and shown to be helpful in many cases, bringing together the building rules and computer checking programs. There is also a new idea called building ontology BOT that could help make this approach even better." Definitions- Architects: People who design buildings. - Compliance: Following the rules or regulations. - Algorithms: Step-by-step instructions for solving problems using a computer. - Building regulations: Rules that buildings must follow for safety and other reasons. - Ambiguous: Not clear or easy to understand. - Incomplete: Not finished or missing important parts. - Vocabulary: Words used by a particular group of people or in a specific field. - Building Information Models (BIM): Computer models of buildings used by architects and engineers. - Geometries: Shapes

The Challenges of Automating Code-Compliance Checking for Building Regulations

Building regulations play a crucial role in ensuring the safety and functionality of constructed buildings. Architects and construction engineers are responsible for adhering to these regulations, which can be a daunting task given their complexity and constantly evolving nature. Manual checking of building models against regulations is time-consuming and prone to human error, making it necessary to explore automated solutions. In their research paper titled "Automated Code-Compliance Checking: Bridging the Gap between Regulation Texts and Automated Checking Algorithms," authors Yacine Rezgui, Christophe Nicolle, and Samad M.E. Sepasgozar discuss the challenges faced by architects and construction engineers in automating code-compliance checking for building regulations. They propose an approach that leverages semantic rules to bridge the gap between regulation texts and automated checking algorithms.

The Need for Automated Code-Compliance Checking

The existing summary highlights the need for algorithms that can process information from construction projects and identify non-compliant elements. This need arises due to several reasons:

• Human-readable texts: Building regulations are typically published as human-readable texts, which are often ambiguous or incomplete.
• Different vocabularies: The vocabulary used to express these regulations differs significantly from the vocabularies used in Building Information Models (BIM).
• Complexity of BIM-contained geometries: The level of detail associated with BIM-contained geometries introduces complexity in calculations.
• Intricacies of IFC standard: The Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) standard, which is widely used in BIM software, poses challenges in automating IFC processing tasks.

These obstacles make it difficult to effectively automate code-compliance checking, leading to errors and delays in the construction process.

The Proposed Approach

To address these challenges, the authors propose an approach that involves using model charts, formal rules, and pre-processors to translate construction regulations into semantic queries. This approach allows for a more precise and automated checking of building models against regulations. The authors demonstrate the usefulness of their approach through several use cases. For example, they show how their method can identify non-compliant elements such as fire exits that are not accessible by people with disabilities. They also highlight how their approach can detect conflicts between different regulations, such as fire safety requirements conflicting with energy efficiency standards.

Future Perspectives

In addition to showcasing the effectiveness of their proposed approach, the authors also discuss future perspectives for standardizing and expanding it. They mention the recent building ontology BOT recommended by the W3C Linked Building Data Community Group as a potential avenue for achieving this goal. By using standardized ontologies like BOT, it will be possible to extend this approach beyond individual projects and apply it on a larger scale.

Conclusion

In conclusion, automating code-compliance checking for building regulations presents several obstacles due to differences in vocabulary and complexity of BIM-contained geometries. However, Rezgui et al.'s proposed approach offers a promising solution by leveraging semantic rules to bridge the gap between regulation texts and automated checking algorithms. Through various use cases, they demonstrate its effectiveness in identifying non-compliant elements and detecting conflicts between different regulations. With further development and standardization using building ontologies like BOT recommended by W3C Linked Building Data Community Group, this approach has the potential to revolutionize code-compliance checking in the construction industry.