CCNet: Extracting High Quality Monolingual Datasets from Web Crawl Data
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Pre-training text representations has become popular in NLP and led to improvements in various NLP tasks
- Quality of pre-training models depends on size and quality of pretraining corpora
- "CCNet: Extracting High Quality Monolingual Datasets from Web Crawl Data" paper describes an automatic pipeline for extracting high-quality monolingual datasets from Common Crawl for various languages
- Pipeline follows data processing method introduced in fastText by Mikolov et al. (2017) and Grave et al. (2018)
- Pipeline is augmented with filtering step to select documents close to high-quality corpora like Wikipedia
- Common Crawl provides vast amount of web crawl data that can be used for training NLP models, but quality varies significantly across different websites and languages
- Extracting high-quality monolingual datasets from Common Crawl can greatly benefit NLP research
- This approach can help improve the performance of pre-trained text representations in many NLP applications
Authors: Guillaume Wenzek, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Alexis Conneau, Vishrav Chaudhary, Francisco Guzmán, Armand Joulin, Edouard Grave
Abstract: Pre-training text representations have led to significant improvements in many areas of natural language processing. The quality of these models benefits greatly from the size of the pretraining corpora as long as its quality is preserved. In this paper, we describe an automatic pipeline to extract massive high-quality monolingual datasets from Common Crawl for a variety of languages. Our pipeline follows the data processing introduced in fastText (Mikolov et al., 2017; Grave et al., 2018), that deduplicates documents and identifies their language. We augment this pipeline with a filtering step to select documents that are close to high quality corpora like Wikipedia.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.