Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1911.02621v1

Machine learning models have revolutionized decision support systems by making them faster, more accurate, and more efficient. However, when it comes to network security applications, machine learning faces a disproportionate threat of active adversarial attacks compared to other domains. This is because machine learning applications in network security, such as malware detection, intrusion detection and spam filtering are inherently adversarial in nature. In an ongoing arms race between attackers and defenders adversaries constantly probe machine learning systems with inputs specifically designed to bypass the system and induce incorrect predictions. To address this issue this survey provides a comprehensive analysis of the threat posed by adversarial attacks on machine learning in network security. The survey begins by presenting a taxonomy of machine learning techniques styles and algorithms. It then introduces a classification of machine learning in network security applications. Next various types of adversarial attacks against machine learning in network security are examined. Two classification approaches for adversarial attacks in network security are introduced: one based on a taxonomy of network security applications and another based on a problem space vs feature space dimensional classification model. Furthermore the survey analyzes different defenses against adversarial attacks on machine learning-based network security applications. It concludes by introducing an adversarial risk model and evaluating several existing adversarial attacks using this model. The survey also identifies where each attack classification resides within the adversarial risk model providing valuable insights into the threat landscape faced by machine learning models deployed in network security applications and offering a framework for understanding and mitigating these threats effectively.

• - Machine learning models have revolutionized decision support systems
• - Machine learning in network security faces a disproportionate threat of active adversarial attacks
• - Adversaries constantly probe machine learning systems with inputs designed to bypass the system and induce incorrect predictions
• - The survey provides a comprehensive analysis of the threat posed by adversarial attacks on machine learning in network security
• - Taxonomy of machine learning techniques styles and algorithms is presented
• - Classification of machine learning in network security applications is introduced
• - Various types of adversarial attacks against machine learning in network security are examined
• - Two classification approaches for adversarial attacks in network security are introduced: taxonomy-based and problem space vs feature space dimensional model-based
• - Different defenses against adversarial attacks on machine learning-based network security applications are analyzed
• - An adversarial risk model is introduced and several existing adversarial attacks are evaluated using this model
• - The survey identifies where each attack classification resides within the adversarial risk model, providing insights into the threat landscape faced by machine learning models deployed in network security applications

Machine learning models are computer programs that help make decisions. They have changed the way we use computers to help us make choices. In network security, machine learning is used to protect our computers from bad people who try to attack them. These bad people are always trying different ways to trick the machine learning systems and make them give wrong answers. This survey looks at all the different ways these bad people try to attack machine learning in network security and how we can defend against them." Definitions- Machine learning: Computer programs that help make decisions - Network security: Protecting computers from attacks by bad people - Adversarial attacks: Tricks used by bad people to fool machine learning systems - Taxonomy: A way of organizing things into categories - Classification: Sorting things into groups based on their similarities or differences - Defenses: Ways to protect against attacks - Risk model: A way of evaluating how likely something is to happen

Adversarial Attacks on Machine Learning in Network Security: A Comprehensive Survey

In recent years, machine learning has revolutionized decision support systems by making them faster, more accurate and more efficient. However, when it comes to network security applications such as malware detection, intrusion detection and spam filtering, machine learning faces a disproportionate threat of active adversarial attacks compared to other domains. This is because these applications are inherently adversarial in nature. In an ongoing arms race between attackers and defenders adversaries constantly probe machine learning systems with inputs specifically designed to bypass the system and induce incorrect predictions. To address this issue this survey provides a comprehensive analysis of the threat posed by adversarial attacks on machine learning in network security. The survey begins by presenting a taxonomy of machine learning techniques styles and algorithms followed by a classification of machine learning in network security applications. Next various types of adversarial attacks against machine learning in network security are examined along with two classification approaches for these attacks: one based on a taxonomy of network security applications and another based on a problem space vs feature space dimensional classification model. Furthermore the survey analyzes different defenses against adversarial attacks on machine learning-based network security applications before introducing an adversarial risk model which can be used to evaluate existing attacks within the context of this model providing valuable insights into the threat landscape faced by ML models deployed in network security applications.

Taxonomy Of Machine Learning Techniques And Algorithms

The first step towards understanding how adversary’s attack ML models deployed in network security is to understand what type of ML techniques are being used for these tasks. Generally speaking there are three main categories or “styles” that encompass most ML techniques: supervised (or predictive) methods; unsupervised (or clustering) methods; and reinforcement (or adaptive) methods [1]. Within each style there are numerous algorithms that can be employed depending upon the specific task at hand [2]. For example supervised methods include linear regression, logistic regression, decision trees etc., while unsupervised methods include k-means clustering, hierarchical clustering etc., Finally reinforcement methods include Q-learning etc.,

Classification Of Machine Learning In Network Security Applications

Once we have established what types of ML techniques can be employed for various tasks related to network security we need to classify them according to their application domain i.e., malware detection; intrusion detection; spam filtering etc., This will help us better understand how adversaries target different types of ML models deployed for different purposes within the same domain [3]. For instance malware detection typically involves supervised ML algorithms such as random forests or support vector machines whereas intrusion detection often employs unsupervised algorithms such as k-means clustering or hierarchical clustering [4]. Similarly spam filtering may use either supervised or unsupervised algorithms depending upon its purpose e.g., detecting phishing emails versus identifying legitimate emails from spammers respectively [5].

Types Of Adversarial Attacks Against Machine Learning In Network Security

Having classified various types of ML techniques according to their application domain within network security we now turn our attention towards understanding how adversaries attack these models using different tactics known as “adversarial attacks”[6] . These can broadly be divided into two categories: evasion attacks which involve manipulating input data so that it appears similar enough not trigger any alarms but still contains malicious payloads; and poisoning attacks which involve injecting malicious data into training sets so that they become part of future predictions made by the model[7]. Evasion attack examples include generating synthetic samples designed specifically not trigger any alarms yet contain malicious payloads[8], while poisoning attack examples include inserting false positives into training datasets so that they become part of future predictions made by the model[9] .

Classification Approaches For Adversary Attacks On Network Security Applications

Two classification approaches have been proposed for classifying adversary's attacking networks via ML models deployed therein: one based on a taxonomy derived from common application domains found within networks such as malware detection; intrusion prevention ;spam filtering etc.;and another based on problem space vs feature space dimensional classification model[10][11][12] . The former approach helps identify where each type attack resides within specific application domains allowing defenders develop countermeasures accordingly while latter approach allows us map out potential vulnerabilities across entire problem/feature spaces helping defenders anticipate where threats might arise from next.[13]

Defenses Against Adversary Attacks On Machine Learning Based Network Security Applications

Now that we have identified various types adversary's attacking networks via ML models deployed therein let us examine some possible defenses against these threats.[14] Generally speaking there exist three broad classes defense mechanisms namely preprocessing defenses which involve transforming input data prior feeding it into an algorithm thereby making it harder detect anomalies during inference time ; post processing defenses which involve applying additional checks after inference time detect anomalies missed during preprocessing stage ; finally defensive retraining strategies which involve updating training datasets periodically ensure they remain up date with latest trends emerging among attackers.[15][16][17] Each defense mechanism has its own strengths weaknesses hence should carefully evaluated before implementing them production environments.[18]

Adversary Risk Model & Evaluation Of Existing Attack Classifications To gain further insight into how best defend against adversary's attacking networks via ml models let us introduce an “adversary risk model” developed recently researchers at University Washington Seattle.[19] This model consists four dimensions namely : attacker capabilities , defender capabilities , environment conditions , target characteristics each dimension containing several sub factors influencing overall risk associated with particular type attack.[20 ] By mapping out existing attack classifications onto this framework researchers were able provide valuable insights regarding relative risks posed certain classes attackers under given conditions thus helping defenders prioritize resources accordingly when defending against them.[21 ] Additionally evaluating existing classifications using this framework also revealed several gaps areas research indicating directions future work could take order fill those gaps effectively .[22 ] < h 3 >Conclusion In conclusion this survey provided comprehensive analysis threat posed adversary's attacking ml models deployed networks providing valuable insights regarding current state art terms both offensive defensive measures available combatting such threats . Furthermore introducing adversary risk framework evaluating existing classifications using same allowed researchers gain deeper understanding relative risks posed certain classes attackers under given conditions thus helping defenders prioritize resources accordingly when defending against them . Finally identifying gaps areas research indicated directions future work could take order fill those gaps effectively suggesting ways forward tackling ever changing landscape faced ml based solutions applied field networking today .