Effect of the environment on star formation activity and stellar mass for star-forming galaxies in the COSMOS field

AI-generated keywords: Galaxy Environment Radio Luminosity Star Formation Rate Cosmic Time

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Randriamampandry et al. investigate the relationship between the environment and the galaxy main sequence as well as radio luminosity
  • They use the VLA-COSMOS 3 GHz catalogue, including star-forming galaxies and quiescent galaxies, in three distinct environments and for three different galaxy types
  • The authors conduct a comparative analysis of the distribution of star-forming galaxies with respect to the main sequence consensus region
  • The study supports previous research indicating that star formation rate decreases over cosmic time
  • The slope of the main sequence for various redshift and stellar mass bins is shallower than the consensus main sequence, evolving towards higher redshift bins regardless of environmental factors
  • No significant trends in star formation rate are observed concerning both environments and galaxy types due to large errors
  • Environmental conditions do not cause flattening of the main sequence at high stellar masses, suggesting other mechanisms may be responsible
  • The study provides valuable insights into how environmental factors influence star formation activity and stellar mass in galaxies by considering different environments and galaxy types, as well as incorporating radio observations
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: S. M. Randriamampandry, M. Vaccari, K. M. Hess

arXiv: 2008.13131v1 - DOI (astro-ph.GA)
10 pages, 6 figures. Accepted for publication in MNRAS

Abstract: We investigate the relationship between environment and the galaxy main sequence (the relationship between stellar mass and star formation rate) and also the relationship between environment and radio luminosity (P$_{\rm 1.4GHz}$) to shed new light on the effects of the environments on galaxies. We use the VLA-COSMOS 3 GHz catalogue that consists of star-forming galaxies (SFGs) and quiescent galaxies (AGN) in three different environments (field, filament, cluster) and for three different galaxy types (satellite, central, isolated). We perform for the first time a comparative analysis of the distribution of SFGs with respect to the main sequence (MS) consensus region from the literature, taking into account galaxy environment and using radio observations at 0.1 $\leq$ z $\leq$ 1.2. Our results corroborate that SFR is declining with cosmic time which is consistent with the literature. We find that the slope of the MS for different $z$ and M$_{*}$ bins is shallower than the MS consensus with a gradual evolution towards higher redshift bins, irrespective of environments. We see no SFR trends on both environments and galaxy type given the large errors. In addition, we note that the environment does not seem to be the cause of the flattening of MS at high stellar masses for our sample.

Submitted to arXiv on 30 Aug. 2020

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2008.13131v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their study, Randriamampandry et al. investigate the relationship between the environment and the galaxy main sequence (the correlation between stellar mass and star formation rate) as well as the relationship between the environment and radio luminosity to gain new insights into how environments affect galaxies. They utilize the VLA-COSMOS 3 GHz catalogue, which includes star-forming galaxies (SFGs) and quiescent galaxies (AGN), in three distinct environments (field, filament, cluster) and for three different galaxy types (satellite, central, isolated). The authors conduct a comparative analysis of the distribution of SFGs with respect to the main sequence consensus region from previous literature. They consider galaxy environment and employ radio observations within a redshift range of 0.1 ≤ z ≤ 1.2. The findings of this study support previous research indicating that star formation rate (SFR) decreases over cosmic time. Interestingly, they discover that the slope of the main sequence for various redshift and stellar mass bins is shallower than the consensus main sequence, gradually evolving towards higher redshift bins regardless of environmental factors. However, due to large errors no significant trends in SFR are observed concerning both environments and galaxy types. Furthermore, their sample does not indicate that environmental conditions cause flattening of the main sequence at high stellar masses; suggesting that other mechanisms may be responsible for this phenomenon. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into how environmental factors influence star formation activity and stellar mass in galaxies by considering different environments and galaxy types as well as incorporating radio observations; contributing to our understanding of how galaxies evolve within their surroundings.
Created on 30 Aug. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.