Effect of the environment on star formation activity and stellar mass for star-forming galaxies in the COSMOS field
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Randriamampandry et al. investigate the relationship between the environment and the galaxy main sequence as well as radio luminosity
- They use the VLA-COSMOS 3 GHz catalogue, including star-forming galaxies and quiescent galaxies, in three distinct environments and for three different galaxy types
- The authors conduct a comparative analysis of the distribution of star-forming galaxies with respect to the main sequence consensus region
- The study supports previous research indicating that star formation rate decreases over cosmic time
- The slope of the main sequence for various redshift and stellar mass bins is shallower than the consensus main sequence, evolving towards higher redshift bins regardless of environmental factors
- No significant trends in star formation rate are observed concerning both environments and galaxy types due to large errors
- Environmental conditions do not cause flattening of the main sequence at high stellar masses, suggesting other mechanisms may be responsible
- The study provides valuable insights into how environmental factors influence star formation activity and stellar mass in galaxies by considering different environments and galaxy types, as well as incorporating radio observations
Authors: S. M. Randriamampandry, M. Vaccari, K. M. Hess
Abstract: We investigate the relationship between environment and the galaxy main sequence (the relationship between stellar mass and star formation rate) and also the relationship between environment and radio luminosity (P$_{\rm 1.4GHz}$) to shed new light on the effects of the environments on galaxies. We use the VLA-COSMOS 3 GHz catalogue that consists of star-forming galaxies (SFGs) and quiescent galaxies (AGN) in three different environments (field, filament, cluster) and for three different galaxy types (satellite, central, isolated). We perform for the first time a comparative analysis of the distribution of SFGs with respect to the main sequence (MS) consensus region from the literature, taking into account galaxy environment and using radio observations at 0.1 $\leq$ z $\leq$ 1.2. Our results corroborate that SFR is declining with cosmic time which is consistent with the literature. We find that the slope of the MS for different $z$ and M$_{*}$ bins is shallower than the MS consensus with a gradual evolution towards higher redshift bins, irrespective of environments. We see no SFR trends on both environments and galaxy type given the large errors. In addition, we note that the environment does not seem to be the cause of the flattening of MS at high stellar masses for our sample.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.