Wordcraft: a Human-AI Collaborative Editor for Story Writing
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Wordcraft is an AI-assisted editor for collaborative story writing between human writers and a dialog system.
- It utilizes few-shot learning and conversation to support a wide range of interactions.
- The interface serves as a sandbox for writers to explore transformer-based language models.
- Wordcraft enables collaboration between human writers and AI systems, allowing for new training pipelines involving human-in-the-loop processes.
- It opens up possibilities for innovative evaluation methods beyond traditional input-output paradigms.
- Wordcraft enhances writer productivity, encourages creative exploration, and pushes the boundaries of transformer-based language models.
- It offers an exciting platform for AI-assisted story writing and paves the way for future advancements in training pipelines and evaluation techniques.
Authors: Andy Coenen, Luke Davis, Daphne Ippolito, Emily Reif, Ann Yuan
Abstract: As neural language models grow in effectiveness, they are increasingly being applied in real-world settings. However these applications tend to be limited in the modes of interaction they support. In this extended abstract, we propose Wordcraft, an AI-assisted editor for story writing in which a writer and a dialog system collaborate to write a story. Our novel interface uses few-shot learning and the natural affordances of conversation to support a variety of interactions. Our editor provides a sandbox for writers to probe the boundaries of transformer-based language models and paves the way for future human-in-the-loop training pipelines and novel evaluation methods.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.