Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2108.07732v1

This paper investigates the capabilities of large language models for program synthesis in general-purpose programming languages. The authors evaluate several models with varying parameter sizes on two new benchmarks, MBPP and MathQA-Python, using both few-shot learning and fine-tuning approaches. The benchmarks are designed to assess the models' ability to generate short Python programs based on natural language descriptions. The MBPP dataset consists of 974 programming tasks aimed at entry-level programmers, while the MathQA-Python dataset contains 23,914 problems that involve synthesizing code from more complex text. The results show that the performance of program synthesis scales log-linearly with model size on both datasets. Even without finetuning on a code dataset, the largest models can successfully synthesize solutions for 59.6% of the MBPP problems using few-shot learning with well-designed prompts. Fine-tuning on a held-out portion of the dataset improves performance by approximately 10 percentage points across most model sizes. On the MathQA-Python dataset, the largest fine-tuned model achieves an accuracy of 83.8%. Furthermore, the authors explore how these models can engage in dialog about code by incorporating human feedback to enhance their solutions. They find that natural language feedback from humans reduces error rates by half compared to initial model predictions. Additionally, an error analysis reveals areas where these models struggle and identifies which types of programs are particularly challenging to generate. Finally, the authors investigate the semantic grounding of these models by fine-tuning them to predict program execution results; however even their best performing models generally struggle to predict program outputs given specific inputs. Overall, this study provides insights into the limitations and potential applications of large language models for program synthesis in general purpose programming languages.

• - Large language models for program synthesis in general-purpose programming languages
• - Evaluation of models on two benchmarks: MBPP and MathQA-Python
• - MBPP dataset: 974 programming tasks for entry-level programmers
• - MathQA-Python dataset: 23,914 problems involving synthesizing code from complex text
• - Performance scales log-linearly with model size on both datasets
• - Largest models can synthesize solutions for 59.6% of MBPP problems using few-shot learning
• - Fine-tuning improves performance by approximately 10 percentage points across most model sizes
• - Largest fine-tuned model achieves an accuracy of 83.8% on MathQA-Python dataset
• - Incorporating human feedback reduces error rates by half compared to initial model predictions
• - Error analysis reveals areas where models struggle and challenging types of programs to generate
• - Models struggle to predict program outputs given specific inputs
• - Insights into limitations and potential applications of large language models for program synthesis

Key points 1. There are big computer programs that can help people write other computer programs. 2. These programs were tested on two sets of problems: one with simple tasks for beginners and another with complex math problems. 3. The bigger the program, the better it performed on both sets of problems. 4. The biggest program could solve almost 60% of the beginner problems with just a little bit of help. 5. People can give feedback to these programs to make them better and reduce mistakes. Definitions - Language models: Big computer programs that can understand and generate human language. - Program synthesis: Creating new computer programs automatically using a model or algorithm. - Benchmarks: Tests or standards used to measure performance or compare different things. - Dataset: A collection of data used for testing or training models or algorithms. - Few-shot learning: Learning from only a few examples instead of a lot of them. - Fine-tuning: Making small adjustments to improve the performance of a model after it has been trained initially. - Accuracy: How correct something is compared to the truth or expected result. - Incorporating human feedback: Taking suggestions or corrections from people to improve something. - Error rates: How often mistakes happen in predictions made by a model. - Limitations: Things that restrict what a model can do well or easily achieve.

Exploring the Capabilities of Large Language Models for Program Synthesis in General-Purpose Programming Languages

Program synthesis is a rapidly growing field that seeks to bridge the gap between natural language and code. Recent advances in large language models have enabled researchers to explore their capabilities for program synthesis, particularly in general-purpose programming languages such as Python. In this paper, we investigate the performance of several models with varying parameter sizes on two new benchmarks, MBPP and MathQA-Python, using both few-shot learning and fine-tuning approaches.

MBPP and MathQA-Python Benchmarks

The MBPP dataset consists of 974 programming tasks aimed at entry-level programmers, while the MathQA-Python dataset contains 23,914 problems that involve synthesizing code from more complex text. The datasets are designed to assess the models' ability to generate short Python programs based on natural language descriptions.

Performance Results

The results show that the performance of program synthesis scales log-linearly with model size on both datasets. Even without finetuning on a code dataset, the largest models can successfully synthesize solutions for 59.6% of the MBPP problems using few-shot learning with well-designed prompts. Fine-tuning on a held out portion of the dataset improves performance by approximately 10 percentage points across most model sizes. On the MathQA_Python dataset,the largest fine tuned model achieves an accuracy of 83.8%.

Dialog about Code Incorporating Human Feedback

The authors also explore how these models can engage in dialog about code by incorporating human feedback to enhance their solutions. They find that natural language feedback from humans reduces error rates by half compared to initial model predictions. Additionally, an error analysis reveals areas where these models struggle and identifies which types of programs are particularly challenging to generate.

Semantic Grounding

Finally, they investigate semantic grounding by fine tuning them to predict program execution results; however even their best performing models generally struggle to predict program outputs given specific inputs .Overall ,this study provides insights into limitations and potential applications of large language models for program synthesis in general purpose programming languages .