Objective assessment of corneal transparency in the clinical setting with standard SD-OCT devices
Authors: Maëlle Vilbert, Romain Bocheux, Cristina Georgeon, Vincent Borderie, Pascal Pernot, Kristina Irsch, Karsten Plamann
Abstract: PURPOSE: To develop an automated algorithm allowing extraction of quantitative corneal transparency parameters from clinical spectral-domain OCT images. To establish a representative dataset of normative transparency values from healthy corneas. METHODS: SD-OCT images of 83 normal corneas (ages 22-50 years) from a standard clinical device (RTVue-XR Avanti, Optovue Inc.) were processed. A pre-processing procedure is applied first, including a derivative approach and a PCA-based correction mask, to eliminate common central artifacts (i.e., apex-centered column saturation artifact and posterior stromal artifact) and enable standardized analysis. The mean intensity stromal-depth profile is then extracted over a 6-mm-wide corneal area and analyzed according to our previously developed method deriving quantitative transparency parameters related to the physics of light propagation in tissues, notably tissular heterogeneity (Birge ratio; $B_r$), followed by the photon mean-free path ($l_s$) in homogeneous tissues (i.e., $B_r \sim 1$). RESULTS: After confirming stromal homogeneity ($B_r < 10$, IDR: 1.9-5.1), we measured a median $l_s$ of 570 $\mu$m (IDR: 270-2400 $\mu$m). Considering corneal thicknesses, this may be translated into a median fraction of transmitted (coherent) light $T_{coh(stroma)}$ of 51$\%$ (IDR: 22-83$\%$). No statistically significant correlation between transparency and age or thickness was found. CONCLUSIONS: Our algorithm provides robust and quantitative measurement of corneal transparency from standard clinical SD-OCT images. It yields lower transparency values than previously reported, which may be attributed to our method being exclusively sensitive to spatially coherent light. Excluding images with central artifacts wider than 300 $\mu$m also raises our median $T_{coh(stroma)}$ to 70$\%$ (IDR: 34-87$\%$).
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.