Cloud Property Graph: Connecting Cloud Security Assessments with Static Code Analysis
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The Cloud Property Graph (CloudPG) is a framework that bridges the gap between static code analysis and runtime security assessment of cloud services.
- It resolves data flows between cloud applications deployed on different resources and contextualizes the graph with runtime information, such as encryption settings.
- The graph is based on an ontology of cloud resources, their functionalities, and security features to provide a vendor- and technology-independent representation of a cloud service's security posture.
- CloudPG can be used to detect misconfigurations such as publicly accessible storages or undesired data flows within a cloud service that are restricted by regulations like GDPR.
- The CloudPG framework enables security experts to perform comprehensive assessments of their cloud services' security posture by connecting static code analysis with runtime information.
- By using CloudPG, organizations can proactively identify and address potential risks before they become significant threats to their business operations.
Authors: Christian Banse, Immanuel Kunz, Angelika Schneider, Konrad Weiss
Abstract: In this paper, we present the Cloud Property Graph (CloudPG), which bridges the gap between static code analysis and runtime security assessment of cloud services. The CloudPG is able to resolve data flows between cloud applications deployed on different resources, and contextualizes the graph with runtime information, such as encryption settings. To provide a vendor- and technology-independent representation of a cloud service's security posture, the graph is based on an ontology of cloud resources, their functionalities and security features. We show, using an example, that our CloudPG framework can be used by security experts to identify weaknesses in their cloud deployments, spanning multiple vendors or technologies, such as AWS, Azure and Kubernetes. This includes misconfigurations, such as publicly accessible storages or undesired data flows within a cloud service, as restricted by regulations such as GDPR.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.