A Better Way to Define Dark Matter Haloes

AI-generated keywords: Dark matter haloes self-generated potential Press-Schechter distribution peak-background split model cluster bias

AI-generated Key Points

  • Dark matter haloes are essential components in models of large-scale structure formation
  • Definition of dark matter haloes has been evolving towards more physically motivated criteria
  • Authors propose a new definition for dark matter haloes that is both physically motivated and parameter-free
  • Dark matter halo is composed of particles that orbit within their own self-generated potential according to the proposed definition
  • Study demonstrates that even with approximately 300 particles per halo, it is possible to classify each particle near a halo as either orbiting or infalling based on its dynamical history
  • Mass function of physical haloes follows the Press-Schechter distribution when the critical threshold for collapse varies slowly with peak height
  • Peak-background split prediction of clustering amplitude of physical halos is statistically consistent with simulation data, accuracy no worse than approximately 5%
  • Cluster bias of proposed haloes calculated and compared to predictions from peak-background split model, results show remarkable agreement across entire mass range with an accuracy no worse than approximately 5%
  • Proposed definition for dark matter haloes superior to standard definitions, which typically have an accuracy level of only 10-20% depending on mass
  • Figures provided in the study support the superiority of proposed definition for dark matter haloes
  • Research presents a refined and improved understanding of dark matter haloes and provides a more accurate and physically motivated framework for studying large-scale structure formation models.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Rafael Garcia, Edgar Salazar, Eduardo Rozo, Susmita Adhikari, Han Aung, Benedikt Diemer, Daisuke Nagai, Brandon Wolfe

arXiv: 2207.11827v1 - DOI (astro-ph.CO)
16 pages, 14 figures
License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Abstract: Dark matter haloes have long been recognized as one of the fundamental building blocks of large scale structure formation models. Despite their importance -- or perhaps because of it! -- halo definitions continue to evolve towards more physically motivated criteria. Here, we propose a new definition that is physically motivated, and effectively unique and parameter-free: ''A dark matter halo is comprised of the collection of particles orbiting in their own self-generated potential.'' This definition is enabled by the fact that, even with as few as $\approx 300$ particles per halo, nearly every particle in the vicinity of a halo can be uniquely classified as either orbiting or infalling based on its dynamical history. For brevity, we refer to haloes selected in this way as physical haloes. We demonstrate that: 1) the mass function of physical haloes is Press-Schechter, provided the critical threshold for collapse is allowed to vary slowly with peak height; and 2) the peak-background split prediction of the clustering amplitude of physical halos is statistically consistent with the simulation data, with an accuracy no worse than $\approx 5\%$.

Submitted to arXiv on 24 Jul. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2207.11827v1

Dark matter haloes are essential components in models of large-scale structure formation. However, the definition of these haloes has been evolving towards more physically motivated criteria. In this study, the authors propose a new definition for dark matter haloes that is both physically motivated and parameter-free. According to their definition, a dark matter halo is composed of particles that orbit within their own self-generated potential. The authors demonstrate that even with as few as approximately 300 particles per halo, it is possible to classify each particle near a halo as either orbiting or infalling based on its dynamical history. The study shows two key findings: First, the mass function of physical haloes follows the Press-Schechter distribution when the critical threshold for collapse is allowed to vary slowly with peak height. Second, the peak-background split prediction of the clustering amplitude of physical halos is statistically consistent with simulation data, with an accuracy no worse than approximately 5%. Additionally, the authors calculate the cluster bias of their proposed haloes and compare it to predictions from the peak-background split model. The results show remarkable agreement, with an accuracy no worse than approximately 5% across the entire mass range. This contrasts with standard halo definitions, which typically have an accuracy level of only 10-20% depending on mass. Figures provided in the study further support the superiority of their proposed definition for dark matter haloes. Overall, this research presents a refined and improved understanding of dark matter haloes and provides a more accurate and physically motivated framework for studying large-scale structure formation models.
Created on 12 Jul. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.