Beyond Heart Murmur Detection: Automatic Murmur Grading from Phonocardiogram
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The study aims to develop an algorithmic approach for automatic murmur grading from phonocardiograms (PCGs) of a large population of pediatric patients from a low-resource rural area.
- Murmurs are abnormal heart sounds that can be identified by experts through cardiac auscultation, and the murmur grade is strongly correlated with the patient's clinical condition.
- The proposed method uses Mel spectrogram representation of each PCG recording and an ensemble of 15 convolutional residual neural networks with channel-wise attention mechanisms to classify each PCG recording.
- The final murmur grade for each patient is derived based on the proposed decision rule and considering all estimated labels for available recordings.
- The method was cross-validated on a dataset consisting of 3456 PCG recordings from 1007 patients using a stratified ten-fold cross-validation and tested on a hidden test set comprised of 1538 PCG recordings from 442 patients.
- The overall cross-validation performances for patient-level murmur gradings are 86.3% in terms of unweighted average sensitivities and 81.6% in terms of F1-scores.
- On the test set, the algorithm achieved an unweighted average sensitivity score of 80.4% and an F1-score of 75.8%.
- The sensitivities (and F1 scores) for absent, soft, and loud murmurs were 90.7% (93.6%), 75.8% (66.8%), and 92.3% (84.2%) respectively; indicating that the proposed method provides characterization beyond detection that may enhance classification accuracy in resource limited settings where expert screening costs are relatively high.
Authors: Andoni Elola, Elisabete Aramendi, Jorge Oliveira, Francesco Renna, Miguel T. Coimbra, Matthew A. Reyna, Reza Sameni, Gari D. Clifford, Ali Bahrami Rad
Abstract: Objective: Murmurs are abnormal heart sounds, identified by experts through cardiac auscultation. The murmur grade, a quantitative measure of the murmur intensity, is strongly correlated with the patient's clinical condition. This work aims to estimate each patient's murmur grade (i.e., absent, soft, loud) from multiple auscultation location phonocardiograms (PCGs) of a large population of pediatric patients from a low-resource rural area. Methods: The Mel spectrogram representation of each PCG recording is given to an ensemble of 15 convolutional residual neural networks with channel-wise attention mechanisms to classify each PCG recording. The final murmur grade for each patient is derived based on the proposed decision rule and considering all estimated labels for available recordings. The proposed method is cross-validated on a dataset consisting of 3456 PCG recordings from 1007 patients using a stratified ten-fold cross-validation. Additionally, the method was tested on a hidden test set comprised of 1538 PCG recordings from 442 patients. Results: The overall cross-validation performances for patient-level murmur gradings are 86.3% and 81.6% in terms of the unweighted average of sensitivities and F1-scores, respectively. The sensitivities (and F1-scores) for absent, soft, and loud murmurs are 90.7% (93.6%), 75.8% (66.8%), and 92.3% (84.2%), respectively. On the test set, the algorithm achieves an unweighted average of sensitivities of 80.4% and an F1-score of 75.8%. Conclusions: This study provides a potential approach for algorithmic pre-screening in low-resource settings with relatively high expert screening costs. Significance: The proposed method represents a significant step beyond detection of murmurs, providing characterization of intensity which may provide a enhanced classification of clinical outcomes.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.