Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2211.01910v1

In their paper titled "Large Language Models Are Human-Level Prompt Engineers," authors Yongchao Zhou, Andrei Ioan Muresanu, Ziwen Han, Keiran Paster, Silviu Pitis, Harris Chan, and Jimmy Ba explore the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) as general-purpose computers when conditioned on natural language instructions. They highlight that the performance of these models heavily relies on the quality of the prompt used to guide them and note that most effective prompts are manually crafted by humans. To address this issue, the authors propose a method called Automatic Prompt Engineer (APE) for automatic instruction generation and selection. In this approach, they treat the instruction as a "program" and optimize it by searching through a pool of instruction candidates proposed by an LLM. The goal is to maximize a chosen score function in order to evaluate the quality of the selected instruction. To assess its effectiveness, they conduct experiments on 24 natural language processing (NLP) tasks. The results show that their automatically generated instructions outperform previous LLM baselines significantly and achieve better or comparable performance to instructions generated by human annotators in 19 out of 24 tasks. To further analyze APE's performance, they conduct extensive qualitative and quantitative analyses which demonstrate that APE-engineered prompts can steer models towards truthfulness and informativeness while also improving few-shot learning performance when prepended to standard in-context learning prompts. Additional insights into APE's capabilities are provided through their webpage at https://sites.google.com/view/automatic-prompt-engineer. Overall, this research highlights how automatic prompt engineering can enhance task performance for large language models and presents promising results in generating high-quality instructions for various NLP tasks.

• - Large language models (LLMs) rely heavily on the quality of the prompt used to guide them
• - Most effective prompts are manually crafted by humans
• - Authors propose a method called Automatic Prompt Engineer (APE) for automatic instruction generation and selection
• - APE treats the instruction as a "program" and optimizes it by searching through a pool of instruction candidates proposed by an LLM
• - The goal is to maximize a chosen score function to evaluate the quality of the selected instruction
• - Experiments on 24 natural language processing (NLP) tasks show that automatically generated instructions outperform previous LLM baselines significantly
• - Automatically generated instructions achieve better or comparable performance to instructions generated by human annotators in 19 out of 24 tasks
• - Extensive qualitative and quantitative analyses demonstrate that APE-engineered prompts steer models towards truthfulness, informativeness, and improve few-shot learning performance when prepended to standard in-context learning prompts
• - APE's capabilities are further explained on their webpage at https://sites.google.com/view/automatic-prompt-engineer

Large language models (LLMs) are computer programs that use words to understand and respond to questions or tasks. The quality of the prompt, which is a set of instructions, is very important for LLMs to work well. Usually, humans create the best prompts by hand. But now, there is a new method called Automatic Prompt Engineer (APE) that can automatically make good prompts for LLMs. APE treats the instruction like a program and looks through different options to find the best one. By using APE, LLMs can perform better on many tasks in natural language processing (NLP), which involves understanding and using human language. APE's capabilities are explained more on their website." Definitions- Large language models (LLMs): Computer programs that use words to understand and respond to questions or tasks. - Prompt: A set of instructions given to guide the LLM in its task. - Automatic Prompt Engineer (APE): A method that automatically generates good prompts for LLMs. - Natural Language Processing (NLP): The field of study focused on making computers understand and use human language effectively.

Large Language Models Are Human-Level Prompt Engineers

In their paper titled "Large Language Models Are Human-Level Prompt Engineers," authors Yongchao Zhou, Andrei Ioan Muresanu, Ziwen Han, Keiran Paster, Silviu Pitis, Harris Chan and Jimmy Ba explore the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) as general-purpose computers when conditioned on natural language instructions. They highlight that the performance of these models heavily relies on the quality of the prompt used to guide them and note that most effective prompts are manually crafted by humans. To address this issue, they propose a method called Automatic Prompt Engineer (APE) for automatic instruction generation and selection.

Background

The use of LLMs has become increasingly popular in recent years due to their ability to process natural language data with high accuracy. However, one limitation is that these models require well-crafted prompts in order to perform optimally. As such, manual annotation is often necessary in order to create effective prompts for various tasks. This can be time consuming and costly for organizations or individuals who need quick results from their LLMs.

Automatic Prompt Engineer (APE)

To address this issue, the authors propose a method called Automatic Prompt Engineer (APE). In this approach, they treat the instruction as a "program" and optimize it by searching through a pool of instruction candidates proposed by an LLM. The goal is to maximize a chosen score function in order to evaluate the quality of the selected instruction. To assess its effectiveness, they conduct experiments on 24 natural language processing (NLP) tasks using APE's automatically generated instructions which outperform previous LLM baselines significantly and achieve better or comparable performance to instructions generated by human annotators in 19 out of 24 tasks.

Qualitative & Quantitative Analysis

To further analyze APE's performance, they conduct extensive qualitative and quantitative analyses which demonstrate that APE-engineered prompts can steer models towards truthfulness and informativeness while also improving few-shot learning performance when prepended to standard in-context learning prompts. Additional insights into APE's capabilities are provided through their webpage at https://sites.google.com/view/automatic-prompt-engineer .

Conclusion

Overall, this research highlights how automatic prompt engineering can enhance task performance for large language models and presents promising results in generating high-quality instructions for various NLP tasks