A Comprehensive Survey on Automatic Knowledge Graph Construction

AI-generated keywords: Automatic Knowledge Graph Construction Knowledge Acquisition Knowledge Refinement Knowledge Evolution Data Environment

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Automatic knowledge graph construction aims to manufacture structured human knowledge by extracting informative fact patterns from various data sources.
  • Recent research focuses on acquiring conceptualized structured knowledge beyond just informative data.
  • Researchers have been exploring new ways to handle complex construction tasks in diverse scenarios.
  • A comprehensive survey of over 300 methods was conducted to summarize the latest developments in knowledge graph construction.
  • The process of building a knowledge graph is divided into three steps: knowledge acquisition, knowledge refinement, and knowledge evolution.
  • The survey provides a detailed review of the processes involved in knowledge acquisition, including obtaining entities with fine-grained types and establishing their conceptual linkages to the knowledge graphs, resolving coreferences, and extracting entity relationships in complex scenarios.
  • The survey explores models for knowledge refinement such as knowledge graph completion and fusion techniques.
  • Methods for handling knowledge evolution are also presented, including condition-based acquisition, condition-based graph completion, and dynamic approaches.
  • The authors compare these methods based on the data environment, motivation behind their development, and architectural distinctions.
  • Briefs on accessible resources that can assist readers in developing practical knowledge graph systems are provided.
  • The survey concludes with discussions on the challenges faced in automatic knowledge graph construction and proposes possible directions for future exploration.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Lingfeng Zhong, Jia Wu, Qian Li, Hao Peng, Xindong Wu

This paper contains 50 pages and 22 figures. This paper is submitted to ACM Computing Surveys

Abstract: Automatic knowledge graph construction aims to manufacture structured human knowledge. To this end, much effort has historically been spent extracting informative fact patterns from different data sources. However, more recently, research interest has shifted to acquiring conceptualized structured knowledge beyond informative data. In addition, researchers have also been exploring new ways of handling sophisticated construction tasks in diversified scenarios. Thus, there is a demand for a systematic review of paradigms to organize knowledge structures beyond data-level mentions. To meet this demand, we comprehensively survey more than 300 methods to summarize the latest developments in knowledge graph construction. A knowledge graph is built in three steps: knowledge acquisition, knowledge refinement, and knowledge evolution. The processes of knowledge acquisition are reviewed in detail, including obtaining entities with fine-grained types and their conceptual linkages to knowledge graphs; resolving coreferences; and extracting entity relationships in complex scenarios. The survey covers models for knowledge refinement, including knowledge graph completion, and knowledge fusion. Methods to handle knowledge evolution are also systematically presented, including condition knowledge acquisition, condition knowledge graph completion, and knowledge dynamic. We present the paradigms to compare the distinction among these methods along the axis of the data environment, motivation, and architecture. Additionally, we also provide briefs on accessible resources that can help readers to develop practical knowledge graph systems. The survey concludes with discussions on the challenges and possible directions for future exploration.

Submitted to arXiv on 10 Feb. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2302.05019v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

Automatic knowledge graph construction aims to manufacture structured human knowledge by extracting informative fact patterns from various data sources. Recent research has focused on acquiring conceptualized structured knowledge beyond just informative data. Additionally, researchers have been exploring new ways to handle complex construction tasks in diverse scenarios. This has led to a demand for a systematic review of paradigms that go beyond data-level mentions to organize knowledge structures. To address this demand, the authors of this paper conducted a comprehensive survey of over 300 methods to summarize the latest developments in knowledge graph construction. The process of building a knowledge graph is divided into three steps: knowledge acquisition, knowledge refinement, and knowledge evolution. The survey provides a detailed review of the processes involved in knowledge acquisition such as obtaining entities with fine-grained types and establishing their conceptual linkages to the knowledge graphs; resolving coreferences and extracting entity relationships in complex scenarios. Furthermore, the survey explores models for knowledge refinement such as knowledge graph completion and fusion techniques; it also presents methods for handling knowledge evolution including condition-based acquisition, condition-based graph completion and dynamic approaches. The authors compare these methods based on the data environment, motivation behind their development and architectural distinctions. They also provide briefs on accessible resources that can assist readers in developing practical knowledge graph systems. The survey concludes with discussions on the challenges faced in automatic knowledge graph construction and proposes possible directions for future exploration. Overall, this paper offers an extensive overview of automatic knowledge graph construction methodologies and highlights the advancements made in this field. It serves as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners interested in understanding and implementing effective techniques for organizing structured human knowledge.
Created on 31 Jul. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.