Large language models (LLMs) have become increasingly valuable tools for natural language understanding tasks, including those in safety-critical applications such as healthcare. However, the utility of these models is dependent on their ability to generate outputs that are factually accurate and complete. To address this challenge, researchers have developed dialog-enabled resolving agents (DERA), which leverage the conversational abilities of LLMs like GPT-4 to provide a simple and interpretable forum for models to communicate feedback and iteratively improve output. One specific application of DERA is medical conversation summarization, which involves encapsulating patient-doctor conversations into structured summaries that accurately capture important information. The goal is to provide doctors with useful summaries for downstream tasks such as clinical decision-making. In this study, the researchers focused on summarizing patient-doctor chats into six independent sections: Demographics and Social Determinants of Health, Medical Intent, Pertinent Positives, Pertinent Negatives, Pertinent Unknowns, and Medical History. The DERA setup for medical conversation summarization involves two agent types - a Researcher and a Decider - who both have access to the full medical conversation between the patient and physician. The Decider generates an initial summary of the medical conversation and shares it with the Researcher. The Researcher's role is to identify any discrepancies in the summary and point them out to the Decider. The Decider then either accepts or rejects these suggestions before writing accepted suggestions to a shared scratchpad that it uses at the end of the conversation to generate the final summary. To evaluate DERA's effectiveness in generating better summaries than base GPT-4 performance, human evaluation studies were conducted with four licensed physicians on a random subset of 50 encounters from a dataset containing 500 medical encounters from a chat-based telehealth platform. Results showed that physicians preferred DERA-generated summaries over initial GPT-4 generated summaries by 90% to 10%. Additionally, DERA summaries captured far more clinical information than initial GPT-4 generated summaries. The amount of summaries containing "harmful" information dropped from 2% in the initial summary to 0% in the final DERA summary. Overall, this study demonstrates the potential of DERA as a valuable tool for improving the accuracy and completeness of medical conversation summarization. The researchers also released an open-ended MEDQA dataset at https://github.com/curai/curai-research/tree/main/DERA for further research and development. However, it is important to note that these findings are limited in number and drawn from a patient population specific to the telehealth platform so caution should be exercised when generalizing these results to other settings.
- - Large language models (LLMs) are valuable tools for natural language understanding tasks in safety-critical applications such as healthcare.
- - The accuracy and completeness of LLMs' outputs are crucial for their utility.
- - Dialog-enabled resolving agents (DERA) leverage the conversational abilities of LLMs to provide a forum for models to communicate feedback and improve output.
- - DERA can be used for medical conversation summarization, which involves encapsulating patient-doctor conversations into structured summaries that accurately capture important information.
- - DERA setup involves two agent types - a Researcher and a Decider - who both have access to the full medical conversation between the patient and physician.
- - Human evaluation studies showed that physicians preferred DERA-generated summaries over initial GPT-4 generated summaries by 90% to 10% and captured far more clinical information than initial GPT-4 generated summaries.
- - The study demonstrates the potential of DERA as a valuable tool for improving the accuracy and completeness of medical conversation summarization.
Large language models (LLMs) are like really smart computers that can understand and use human language. They are important for things like healthcare. Accuracy means being correct, and completeness means having all the necessary information. Dialog-enabled resolving agents (DERA) are tools that help LLMs communicate better with people to improve their work. Medical conversation summarization is when you take a long talk between a doctor and patient and make it shorter but still keep all the important information. DERA has two parts - a Researcher and a Decider - who work together to make sure the summaries are good. Doctors liked DERA's summaries more than other computer-generated ones, so it could be helpful in making medical conversations easier to understand.
Using Dialog-Enabled Resolving Agents for Medical Conversation Summarization
Large language models (LLMs) have become increasingly valuable tools in natural language understanding tasks, including those with safety-critical applications such as healthcare. However, the utility of these models is dependent on their ability to generate outputs that are factually accurate and complete. To address this challenge, researchers have developed dialog-enabled resolving agents (DERA), which leverage the conversational abilities of LLMs like GPT-4 to provide a simple and interpretable forum for models to communicate feedback and iteratively improve output. In this article, we will discuss one specific application of DERA - medical conversation summarization - and how it can be used to accurately capture important information from patient-doctor conversations.
What is Medical Conversation Summarization?
Medical conversation summarization involves encapsulating patient-doctor conversations into structured summaries that accurately capture important information. The goal is to provide doctors with useful summaries for downstream tasks such as clinical decision-making. In this study, the researchers focused on summarizing patient-doctor chats into six independent sections: Demographics and Social Determinants of Health, Medical Intent, Pertinent Positives, Pertinent Negatives, Pertinent Unknowns, and Medical History.
How Does DERA Work?
The DERA setup for medical conversation summarization involves two agent types - a Researcher and a Decider - who both have access to the full medical conversation between the patient and physician. The Decider generates an initial summary of the medical conversation and shares it with the Researcher. The Researcher's role is to identify any discrepancies in the summary and point them out to the Decider. The Decider then either accepts or rejects these suggestions before writing accepted suggestions to a shared scratchpad that it uses at the end of the conversation to generate the final summary.
Evaluating Performance
To evaluate DERA's effectiveness in generating better summaries than base GPT-4 performance, human evaluation studies were conducted with four licensed physicians on a random subset of 50 encounters from a dataset containing 500 medical encounters from a chat-based telehealth platform. Results showed that physicians preferred DERA generated summaries over initial GPT-4 generated summaries by 90% to 10%. Additionally, DERA summaries captured far more clinical information than initial GPT 4 generated summaries; specifically amounting up 2% less “harmful” information compared 0% in final DERA summary versus initial GPT 4 summary respectively .
Conclusion
Overall, this study demonstrates great potential for using dialog enabled resolving agents (DERA) as an effective tool for improving accuracy & completeness when it comes down medical conversation summarizations . Furthermore ,the researchers also released an open ended MEDQA dataset at https://github/curai/curai research/tree/main/DERA ,for further research & development purposes . It should be noted however ,that these findings are limited number wise & drawn from specific population within telehealth platform ;so caution should be exercised when generalizing results across different settings .