ChemCrow: Augmenting large-language models with chemistry tools

AI-generated keywords: ChemCrow

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Chemistry-related problems are challenging for large-language models (LLMs) due to limited access to external knowledge sources.
  • ChemCrow is an LLM chemistry agent designed to tackle tasks across organic synthesis, drug discovery, and materials design.
  • ChemCrow integrates 13 expert-designed tools to augment LLM performance in chemistry and unlock new capabilities.
  • Evaluation of ChemCrow's effectiveness includes both LLM and expert human assessments that demonstrate its ability to automate a diverse set of chemical tasks.
  • GPT-4 as an evaluator cannot distinguish between clearly wrong GPT-4 completions and GPT-4 + ChemCrow performance, raising concerns about potential misuse of such tools like ChemCrow and highlighting the importance of responsible use.
  • Responsible use of such tools can aid expert chemists while lowering barriers for non-experts and foster scientific advancement by bridging the gap between experimental and computational chemistry.
  • With further development and responsible use, ChemCrow has the potential to significantly impact scientific research in various domains related to chemistry.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Andres M Bran, Sam Cox, Andrew D White, Philippe Schwaller

arXiv: 2304.05376v1 - DOI (physics.chem-ph)

Abstract: Large-language models (LLMs) have recently shown strong performance in tasks across domains, but struggle with chemistry-related problems. Moreover, these models lack access to external knowledge sources, limiting their usefulness in scientific applications. In this study, we introduce ChemCrow, an LLM chemistry agent designed to accomplish tasks across organic synthesis, drug discovery, and materials design. By integrating 13 expert-designed tools, ChemCrow augments the LLM performance in chemistry, and new capabilities emerge. Our evaluation, including both LLM and expert human assessments, demonstrates ChemCrow's effectiveness in automating a diverse set of chemical tasks. Surprisingly, we find that GPT-4 as an evaluator cannot distinguish between clearly wrong GPT-4 completions and GPT-4 + ChemCrow performance. There is a significant risk of misuse of tools like ChemCrow and we discuss their potential harms. Employed responsibly, ChemCrow not only aids expert chemists and lowers barriers for non-experts, but also fosters scientific advancement by bridging the gap between experimental and computational chemistry.

Submitted to arXiv on 11 Apr. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2304.05376v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

Chemistry-related problems have been a challenge for large-language models (LLMs) due to their limited access to external knowledge sources. However, a recent study by Andres M Bran, Sam Cox, Andrew D White, and Philippe Schwaller introduces ChemCrow, an LLM chemistry agent designed to tackle tasks across organic synthesis, drug discovery, and materials design. By integrating 13 expert-designed tools, ChemCrow augments the LLM performance in chemistry and unlocks new capabilities. The evaluation of ChemCrow's effectiveness includes both LLM and expert human assessments that demonstrate its ability to automate a diverse set of chemical tasks. Interestingly, the study finds that GPT-4 as an evaluator cannot distinguish between clearly wrong GPT-4 completions and GPT-4 + ChemCrow performance. This raises concerns about the potential misuse of such tools like ChemCrow and highlights the importance of responsible use. The authors discuss the potential harms of misusing these tools but also emphasize their responsible use can aid expert chemists while lowering barriers for non-experts. Furthermore, they suggest that such tools can foster scientific advancement by bridging the gap between experimental and computational chemistry. Overall, this study presents an innovative solution to address challenges faced by LLMs in chemistry-related problems. With further development and responsible use, ChemCrow has the potential to significantly impact scientific research in various domains related to chemistry.
Created on 20 Jun. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.