Observations of neutral carbon in 29 high-z lensed dusty star forming galaxies and the comparison of gas mass tracers
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- High-redshift dusty star-forming galaxies (high-z DSFGs) have massive gas reservoirs that drive intense star-formation rates
- Various gas mass tracers such as [CI], CO, [CII] emission lines and dust content are used to estimate molecular gas content of high-z DSFGs
- Uncertainties on factors such as aCO, XCI, aCII and GDR can limit the accuracy of these tracers
- Observations were carried out for 29 SPT-SMGs using ALMA-ACA to observe two [CI] line transitions and new APEX observations of [CII] line were presented for nine of these galaxies
- Results show a nearly linear relation between infrared luminosity and [CI] luminosity when fitting starbursts and main-sequence galaxies separately; median excitation temperature derived from [CI] was found to be 34.5+/-2.1 K
- Properties of interstellar medium (ISM), such as density and radiation field intensity, were probed using [CI] to mid- or high-J CO lines and [CI] to infrared luminosity ratio; similar values were found compared to SMG populations in literature
- Gas masses estimated from various tracers did not exhibit any significant trend with infrared luminosity or dust temperature
- Cross-calibrations between these tracers confirmed that [CI] is a suitable tracer for estimating molecular gas content at high redshift; overall agreement was observed between all classical gas tracers used at high redshift
- Absolute calibration remains uncertain leading to uncertainty in gas depletion timescale measurements
- This study provides important insights into the nature and evolution of high-z DSFGs and highlights the need for further research in this area
Authors: G. Gururajan, M. Béthermin, N. Sulzenauer, P. Theulé, J. S. Spilker, M. Aravena, S. C. Chapman, A. Gonzalez, T. R. Greve, D. Narayanan, C. Reuter, J. D. Vieira, A. Weiss
Abstract: The nature and evolution of high-redshift dusty star-forming galaxies (high-z DSFGs) remain an open question. Their massive gas reservoirs play an important role in driving the intense star-formation rates hosted in these galaxies. We aim to estimate the molecular gas content of high-z DSFGs by using various gas mass tracers such as the [CI], CO, [CII] emission lines and the dust content. These tracers need to be well calibrated as they are all limited by uncertainties on factors such as aCO, XCI, aCII and GDR, thereby affecting the determination of the gas mass accurately. The main goal of our work is to check the consistency between the gas mass tracers and cross-calibrate the uncertain factors. We observe the two [CI] line transitions for 29 SPT-SMGs with the ALMA-ACA. Additionally, we also present new APEX observations of [CII] line for 9 of these galaxies. We find a nearly linear relation between the infrared luminosity and [CI] luminosity if we fit the starbursts and main-sequence galaxies separately. We measure a median [CI]-derived excitation temperature of 34.5+/-2.1 K. We probe the properties of the interstellar medium (ISM) such as density and radiation field intensity using [CI] to mid- or high-J CO lines and [CI] to infrared luminosity ratio, and find similar values to the SMG populations in literature. Finally, the gas masses estimated from [CI], CO, dust, and [CII] do not exhibit any significant trend with the infrared luminosity or the dust temperature. We provide the various cross-calibrations between these tracers. Our study confirms that [CI] is a suitable tracer of the molecular gas content, and shows an overall agreement between all the classical gas tracers used at high redshift. However, their absolute calibration and thus the gas depletion timescale measurements remain uncertain.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.