Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2306.07996v1

This review article focuses on the importance of accurate modelling of the Point Spread Function (PSF) in astronomical observations, particularly for measuring celestial objects' properties. With the increasing power and complexity of astronomical telescopes and instruments, upcoming galaxy surveys like Euclid and LSST will observe an unprecedented amount and quality of data, requiring novel PSF modelling techniques that can cope with tightening error requirements. The authors first introduce the optical background required for a more physically-motivated PSF modelling and propose an observational model that can be reused for future developments. They provide an overview of the different physical contributors to the PSF, including optic- and detector-level contributors and atmospheric effects. The authors then discuss different methods for PSF modelling from parametric and non-parametric families for ground- and space-based telescopes, with their advantages and limitations. Validation methods for PSF models are also addressed, with several metrics related to weak lensing studies discussed in detail. The review highlights current challenges in PSF modelling for astronomical telescopes, including building fast yet powerful models that can meet higher PSF requirements set by next-generation telescopes such as Vera C. Rubin observatory, Euclid, and Roman space telescopes. The authors suggest possible solutions such as exploiting parallel computing architectures or better-performing programming languages to address computing time being a common bottleneck for these models. Another challenge is incorporating complex effects into the PSF model that cannot be directly constrained from observations; simulations or complementary observations may be used to obtain this information but it may not match precisely with real observations due to changes in the telescope or measurement errors. Validation of PSF models from real observations is also challenging since access to ground truth PSFs is unavailable; current error propagation methods have simplifying assumptions that do not hold anymore with recent and upcoming telescopes so further development is required to define realistic requirements. The authors declare no conflict of interest and acknowledge funding from the TITAN ERA Chair project within the Horizon Europe Framework Program of the European Commission. They also list several open-source simulating and modelling software used in this review, including GALSIM, WEBBPSF, PHOSIM, WAVEDIFF, SHAPEPIPE, PIFF, MCCD, RCA, PSFEX TINY-TIM ,and PHOTUTILS .Overall ,this review provides a comprehensive overview of PSF modelling for astronomical telescopes with insights into current challenges ,future directions ,and potential solutions .

• - Accurate modelling of the Point Spread Function (PSF) is important in astronomical observations for measuring celestial objects' properties
• - Upcoming galaxy surveys like Euclid and LSST will require novel PSF modelling techniques that can cope with tightening error requirements
• - The authors introduce the optical background required for a more physically-motivated PSF modelling and propose an observational model that can be reused for future developments
• - Different physical contributors to the PSF are discussed, including optic- and detector-level contributors and atmospheric effects
• - Different methods for PSF modelling from parametric and non-parametric families for ground- and space-based telescopes are discussed, with their advantages and limitations
• - Validation methods for PSF models are addressed, with several metrics related to weak lensing studies discussed in detail
• - Current challenges in PSF modelling for astronomical telescopes include building fast yet powerful models that can meet higher PSF requirements set by next-generation telescopes such as Vera C. Rubin observatory, Euclid, and Roman space telescopes.
• - Possible solutions suggested include exploiting parallel computing architectures or better-performing programming languages to address computing time being a common bottleneck for these models.
• - Another challenge is incorporating complex effects into the PSF model that cannot be directly constrained from observations; simulations or complementary observations may be used to obtain this information but it may not match precisely with real observations due to changes in the telescope or measurement errors.
• - Validation of PSF models from real observations is also challenging since access to ground truth PSFs is unavailable; current error propagation methods have simplifying assumptions that do not hold anymore with recent and upcoming telescopes so further development is required to define realistic requirements.
• - The authors declare no conflict of interest and acknowledge funding from the TITAN ERA Chair project within the Horizon Europe Framework Program of the European Commission.
• - Several open-source simulating and modelling software used in this review are listed, including GALSIM, WEBBPSF, PHOSIM, WAVEDIFF, SHAPEPIPE, PIFF, MCCD, RCA, PSFEX TINY-TIM ,and PHOTUTILS.
• - Overall, this review provides a comprehensive overview of PSF modelling for astronomical telescopes with insights into current challenges, future directions and potential solutions.

Summary: This article talks about how important it is to accurately model the Point Spread Function (PSF) in astronomy for measuring celestial objects. It discusses upcoming galaxy surveys and the need for new PSF modelling techniques. The article also explains different physical contributors to the PSF and methods for modelling it, as well as challenges in validating PSF models and possible solutions. Definitions: - Point Spread Function (PSF): a mathematical function that describes how light spreads out from a point source in an image - Observational model: a mathematical representation of how data is collected during an observation - Parametric and non-parametric families: different types of mathematical models used to describe data - Weak lensing studies: a technique used to measure the mass distribution of galaxies by observing their gravitational effects on light passing through them - Ground truth PSFs: the actual, true PSFs that are not always available for comparison with modelled PSFs

Accurate Modelling of Point Spread Function (PSF) for Astronomical Observations

Astronomical observations rely on accurate modelling of the Point Spread Function (PSF), which is a measure of how light from a celestial object spreads out as it passes through an optical system. With upcoming galaxy surveys such as Euclid and LSST, there is an increasing need for novel PSF modelling techniques that can meet higher error requirements. In this review article, we discuss the importance of accurate PSF modelling in astronomical observations and provide an overview of different methods used to model the PSF. We also address current challenges in PSF modelling and suggest potential solutions.

Background

The optical background required for physically-motivated PSF modelling includes understanding the physical contributors to the PSF at both optic-level and detector-level, as well as atmospheric effects. At optic level, aberrations such as coma, astigmatism or spherical aberration affect the shape of the point spread function; at detector level, noise sources like readout noise or dark current contribute to its width. Atmospheric effects such as seeing also play a role in determining the final shape of the point spread function.

Methods for Modeling Point Spread Function

Different methods are available for modeling point spread functions from parametric and non-parametric families for ground-based telescopes and space-based telescopes respectively. Parametric models assume that all components contributing to the observed image can be described by analytical functions with adjustable parameters; these models are computationally efficient but may not accurately capture complex features due to their limited flexibility. Non-parametric models do not make any assumptions about functional forms but require more computing time; they can better capture complex features but may suffer from overfitting if too many parameters are used in fitting them to data points . Validation methods for PSFs include metrics related to weak lensing studies such as shear bias estimation or residuals analysis between observed images and simulated ones; other metrics include peak flux accuracy or ellipticity measurements .

Current Challenges in Point Spread Function Modeling

Building fast yet powerful models that can meet higher requirements set by next generation telescopes is one major challenge faced by researchers today when it comes to developing new techniques for modeling point spread functions accurately . Incorporating complex effects into these models which cannot be directly constrained from observations is another challenge since simulations or complementary observations may be used instead ,but they may not match precisely with real observations due to changes in telescope configuration or measurement errors . Validation of these models using real observational data is also difficult since access to ground truth psfs is unavailable ; existing error propagation methods have simplifying assumptions that do not hold anymore with recent/upcoming telescopes so further development is needed here .

Potential Solutions

Exploiting parallel computing architectures or better performing programming languages could help address computing time being a common bottleneck when building fast yet powerful psf models , while simulations/complementary observations could help incorporate complex effects into psf model that cannot be directly constrained from observation . Further development on existing error propagation methods could help validate psf model using real observational data more accurately without relying on simplifying assumptions made earlier .

Conclusion This review provides a comprehensive overview of current challenges faced by researchers when it comes to developing new techniques for accurately modeling point spread functions , along with potential solutions suggested based on exploiting parallel computing architectures /better performing programming languages /simulations/complementary observation etc .. It highlights future directions including building faster yet powerful psf model capable meeting higher requirements set by next generation telescope , incorporating complex effect into psf model ,and validating them using real observational data without relying on simplifying assumption made earlier .. The authors declare no conflict of interest & acknowledge funding from TITAN ERA Chair project within Horizon Europe Framework Program European Commission.. They also list several open source simulating &modeling software used this review including GALSIM ,WEBBPSF ,PHOSIM ,WAVEDIFF SHAPEPIPE PIFF MCCD RCA PSFEEX TINYTIM & PHOTUTILS ..