Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2306.12338v1

In their research, Isaac David, Liyi Zhou, Kaihua Qin, Dawn Song, Lorenzo Cavallaro and Arthur Gervais investigate the feasibility of using large language models (LLMs) for conducting security audits of smart contracts. They aim to optimize prompt engineering for enhanced security analysis and evaluate the performance and accuracy of LLMs using a benchmark dataset consisting of 52 previously compromised Decentralized Finance (DeFi) smart contracts. The researchers find that when vulnerable contracts are analyzed, both the GPT-4 and Claude models correctly identify the vulnerability type in 40% of cases. However, these models also exhibit a high false positive rate, indicating the need for continued involvement from manual auditors. Despite this limitation, the LLMs tested outperform a random model by 20% in terms of F1-score. To ensure the integrity of their study, mutation testing is conducted on five newly developed supposedly secure smart contracts. The researchers manually insert two and 15 vulnerabilities into each contract. This testing reveals an impressive best-case true positive rate of 78.7% for the GPT-4-32k model. The models are evaluated using both binary classification tasks to determine contract vulnerability and non-binary prompts as well as examining the influence of model temperature variations and context length on LLM performance. Overall, this research highlights the potential benefits of employing LLMs in security audits but emphasizes that manual auditors' involvement remains crucial due to the high false positive rate exhibited by these models. Although there is room for further enhancements, this work lays the groundwork for a more efficient and cost-effective approach to conducting smart contract security audits.

• - Isaac David, Liyi Zhou, Kaihua Qin, Dawn Song, Lorenzo Cavallaro, and Arthur Gervais investigate the feasibility of using large language models (LLMs) for security audits of smart contracts.
• - The researchers evaluate the performance and accuracy of LLMs using a benchmark dataset of 52 compromised DeFi smart contracts.
• - GPT-4 and Claude models correctly identify vulnerability types in 40% of cases but have a high false positive rate.
• - LLMs outperform a random model by 20% in terms of F1-score.
• - Mutation testing on five newly developed secure smart contracts reveals a best-case true positive rate of 78.7% for the GPT-4-32k model.
• - The models are evaluated using binary classification tasks and non-binary prompts, considering model temperature variations and context length.
• - Manual auditors' involvement remains crucial due to the high false positive rate exhibited by LLMs.
• - This research lays the groundwork for a more efficient and cost-effective approach to conducting smart contract security audits.

Researchers investigated if they can use big language models to check if smart contracts are secure. They tested the models using 52 compromised DeFi smart contracts and found that the models were able to identify some vulnerabilities but also made mistakes sometimes. The models performed better than a random model by 20%. When they tested new secure smart contracts, one of the models had a true positive rate of 78.7%. However, manual auditors are still important because the models make false positive mistakes. This research helps make checking smart contracts for security faster and cheaper. Definitions- Feasibility: If something is possible or doable. - Large language models (LLMs): Big computer programs that understand and generate human-like text. - Security audits: Checking if something is safe and protected from harm. - Compromised: When something has been attacked or damaged. - DeFi: Short for decentralized finance, which means financial systems that don't rely on traditional banks or institutions. - Vulnerability types: Different ways in which something can be weak or easily harmed. - False positive rate: When a test says there is a problem when there isn't actually one. - F1-score: A measure of how well a model performs at identifying problems. - Mutation testing: Changing things in order to see how it affects something else. - Binary classification tasks: Deciding if something falls into one category or another (yes/no). - Non-binary prompts: Giving information that doesn't have just two options (yes/no

Using Large Language Models for Smart Contract Security Audits

In the world of blockchain technology, smart contracts are becoming increasingly popular. However, with their growing popularity comes an increased need for security audits to ensure that these contracts are secure and free from vulnerabilities. To address this issue, researchers Isaac David, Liyi Zhou, Kaihua Qin, Dawn Song, Lorenzo Cavallaro and Arthur Gervais recently conducted a study investigating the feasibility of using large language models (LLMs) for conducting security audits of smart contracts.

Background

The researchers aimed to optimize prompt engineering for enhanced security analysis and evaluate the performance and accuracy of LLMs using a benchmark dataset consisting of 52 previously compromised Decentralized Finance (DeFi) smart contracts. The two LLMs tested in this study were GPT-4-32k and Claude models. In addition to binary classification tasks to determine contract vulnerability or non-vulnerability, the researchers also examined the influence of model temperature variations and context length on LLM performance.

Results

When vulnerable contracts were analyzed by both GPT-4-32k and Claude models correctly identified the vulnerability type in 40% of cases; however they also exhibited a high false positive rate which indicates that manual auditors' involvement remains crucial due to this limitation. Despite this limitation, these models outperformed a random model by 20% in terms of F1-score when evaluated using binary classification tasks as well as examining temperature variations and context length on LLM performance. To ensure the integrity of their study mutation testing was conducted on five newly developed supposedly secure smart contracts where two or 15 vulnerabilities were manually inserted into each contract respectively. This testing revealed an impressive best case true positive rate 78.7% for GPT-4 32k model which further highlights its potential benefits when employed in security audits but emphasizes that manual auditors' involvement is still necessary due to its high false positive rate exhibited by these models .

Conclusion

Overall ,this research provides insight into how large language models can be used effectively in conducting smart contract security audits while still requiring manual auditor's involvement due to its high false positive rates . Although there is room for further enhancements ,this work lays down groundwork for more efficient approach towards cost effective audit process .