Linear Convergence of Black-Box Variational Inference: Should We Stick the Landing?

AI-generated keywords: BBVI STL Variational Inference Gradient Variance Convergence

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Black-box variational inference (BBVI) with control variates achieves geometric convergence under perfect variational family specification
  • Quadratic bound on the gradient variance of the sticking-the-landing (STL) estimator extends to misspecified variational families
  • Convergence of BBVI using projected stochastic gradient descent is implied by the quadratic variance condition
  • Analysis of regular closed-form entropy gradient estimators is improved upon and compared to the STL estimator
  • Explicit non-asymptotic complexity guarantees are provided for both methods
  • Contributes to understanding of BBVI and its convergence properties, offering insights into gradient variance bounds
  • Provides valuable guidance for practitioners working with variational inference methods
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Kyurae Kim, Yian Ma, Jacob R. Gardner

Abstract: We prove that black-box variational inference (BBVI) with control variates, particularly the sticking-the-landing (STL) estimator, converges at a geometric (traditionally called "linear") rate under perfect variational family specification. In particular, we prove a quadratic bound on the gradient variance of the STL estimator, one which encompasses misspecified variational families. Combined with previous works on the quadratic variance condition, this directly implies convergence of BBVI with the use of projected stochastic gradient descent. We also improve existing analysis on the regular closed-form entropy gradient estimators, which enables comparison against the STL estimator and provides explicit non-asymptotic complexity guarantees for both.

Submitted to arXiv on 27 Jul. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2307.14642v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

This paper presents a proof that black-box variational inference (BBVI) with control variates, specifically the sticking-the-landing (STL) estimator, achieves geometric convergence under perfect variational family specification. The authors establish a quadratic bound on the gradient variance of the STL estimator which extends to encompass misspecified variational families. This result combined with previous research on the quadratic variance condition implies the convergence of BBVI when using projected stochastic gradient descent. Additionally, this study improves upon existing analysis of regular closed-form entropy gradient estimators and enables a comparison between these estimators and the STL estimator while providing explicit non-asymptotic complexity guarantees for both methods. Overall, this paper contributes to our understanding of BBVI and its convergence properties by demonstrating geometric convergence under certain conditions and offering insights into gradient variance bounds. These theoretical foundations provide valuable guidance for practitioners working with variational inference methods.
Created on 07 Aug. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.