Algorithm of Thoughts: Enhancing Exploration of Ideas in Large Language Models

AI-generated keywords: Large Language Models (LLMs)

AI-generated Key Points

  • Recent literature focuses on surpassing the limitations of the "Chain-of-Thought" approach in enhancing reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs)
  • Existing methods often rely on external modus operandi, leading to increased costs, memory usage, and computational overheads
  • Proposed strategy called Algorithm of Thoughts leverages algorithmic reasoning pathways to propel LLMs towards in-context learning
  • Utilizing algorithmic examples taps into the innate recurrence dynamics of LLMs and expands idea exploration with just one or a few queries
  • Technique outperforms earlier single-query methods and is comparable to a recent multi-query strategy using an extensive tree search algorithm
  • Instructing an LLM using an algorithm can lead to performance surpassing that of the algorithm itself, suggesting LLMs have inherent intuition for optimized searches
  • Efficacy of the method is delved into and its nuances in application are explored
  • Related work includes input-output prompting and more advanced techniques proposed by Shao et al., Wei et al., and Lyu et al.
  • Findings are summarized in conclusion
  • Figure 2 provides an illustration outlining various strategies for tackling reasoning problems with LLMs, with green boxes indicating promising ideas identified by the LLM and red boxes representing less promising concepts.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Bilgehan Sel, Ahmad Al-Tawaha, Vanshaj Khattar, Lu Wang, Ruoxi Jia, Ming Jin

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Current literature, aiming to surpass the "Chain-of-Thought" approach, often resorts to an external modus operandi involving halting, modifying, and then resuming the generation process to boost Large Language Models' (LLMs) reasoning capacities. This mode escalates the number of query requests, leading to increased costs, memory, and computational overheads. Addressing this, we propose the Algorithm of Thoughts -- a novel strategy that propels LLMs through algorithmic reasoning pathways, pioneering a new mode of in-context learning. By employing algorithmic examples, we exploit the innate recurrence dynamics of LLMs, expanding their idea exploration with merely one or a few queries. Our technique outperforms earlier single-query methods and stands on par with a recent multi-query strategy that employs an extensive tree search algorithm. Intriguingly, our results suggest that instructing an LLM using an algorithm can lead to performance surpassing that of the algorithm itself, hinting at LLM's inherent ability to weave its intuition into optimized searches. We probe into the underpinnings of our method's efficacy and its nuances in application.

Submitted to arXiv on 20 Aug. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2308.10379v1

In recent literature, there has been a focus on surpassing the limitations of the "Chain-of-Thought" approach in enhancing the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). To address the challenges posed by existing methods, which often rely on an external modus operandi that involves halting, modifying, and then resuming the generation process leading to increased costs, memory usage, and computational overheads due to the escalated number of query requests, we propose a novel strategy called the Algorithm of Thoughts. This approach leverages algorithmic reasoning pathways to propel LLMs towards in-context learning. By utilizing algorithmic examples, we tap into the innate recurrence dynamics of LLMs and expand their idea exploration with just one or a few queries. Our technique outperforms earlier single-query methods and is comparable to a recent multi-query strategy that employs an extensive tree search algorithm. Interestingly, our results indicate that instructing an LLM using an algorithm can lead to performance surpassing that of the algorithm itself. This suggests that LLMs have an inherent ability to weave their intuition into optimized searches. We delve into the efficacy of our method and explore its nuances in application. In subsequent sections, we situate our work within the existing literature and discuss our principal idea. We then present experimental results and investigate hypotheses related to this emerging capability of LLMs. Related work in this field includes standard prompting approaches such as input-output prompting which tends to yield lower performance compared to more advanced techniques proposed by Shao et al., Wei et al., and Lyu et al.. Finally, we conclude by summarizing our findings. Figure 2 provides an illustration outlining various strategies for tackling reasoning problems with LLMs. Each box represents a distinct thought or concept forming an incremental pathway to reasoning. Green boxes indicate promising ideas identified by the LLM while red boxes represent less promising concepts.
Created on 05 Sep. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.