UNCOVER: A NIRSpec Census of Lensed Galaxies at z=8.50-13.08 Probing a High AGN Fraction and Ionized Bubbles in the Shadow

AI-generated keywords: Gravitationally lensed galaxies

AI-generated Key Points

  • Study using JWST NIRSpec prism spectroscopy to observe gravitationally lensed galaxies at redshifts > 9
  • Focus on confirming redshifts and investigating properties of high-redshift galaxies
  • Confirmation of source redshift for ten galaxies in the range of z=8.50-13.08
  • Ultraviolet (UV) luminosities down to $M_{\rm UV}=-17.3$
  • 100% confirmation rate for candidates with redshifts > 9
  • Caution regarding offset between emission lines and Lyman-alpha break estimates
  • Lower limits on rest-frame UV luminosity function (LF) derived at redshifts ~9-12, consistent with recent photometric measurements
  • Identification of active galactic nucleus (AGN) systems based on X-ray emission, broad line H$\beta$, high ionization line detections, and excess in UVLF
  • Confirmation of one UV-luminous source at same redshift as dusty broad-line AGN with physical separation of 380 kpc in source plane
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Seiji Fujimoto, Bingjie Wang, John Weaver, Vasily Kokorev, Hakim Atek, Rachel Bezanson, Ivo Labbe, Gabriel Brammer, Jenny E. Greene, Iryna Chemerynska, Pratika Dayal, Anna de Graaff, Lukas J. Furtak, Pascal A. Oesch, David J. Setton, Sedona H. Price, Tim B. Miller, Christina C. Williams, Katherine E. Whitaker, Adi Zitrin, Sam E. Cutler, Joel Leja, Richard Pan, Dan Coe, Pieter van Dokkum, Robert Feldmann, Yoshinobu Fudamoto, Andy D. Goulding, Gourav Khullar, Danilo Marchesini, Michael Maseda, Themiya Nanayakkara, Erica J. Nelson, Renske Smit, Mauro Stefanon, Andrea Weibel

arXiv: 2308.11609v1 - DOI (astro-ph.GA)
25 pages, 11 figures, 3 tables, submitted to ApJ
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: We present JWST NIRSpec prism spectroscopy of gravitationally lensed galaxies at $z\gtrsim9$ found behind the massive galaxy cluster Abell 2744 in the UNCOVER Cycle 1 Treasury Program. We confirm the source redshift via emission lines and/or the Ly$\alpha$ break feature for ten galaxies at z=8.50-13.08 down to $M_{\rm UV}=-17.3$. We achieve a high confirmation rate of 100\% for $z>9$ candidates reported in Atek et al. (2023). Using six sources with multiple emission line detections, we find that the offset of the redshift estimates between the lines and the Ly$\alpha$ break alone with prism can be as large as $\pm0.2$, raising caution in designing future follow-up spectroscopy for the break-only sources. With spec-$z$ confirmed sources in UNCOVER and the literature, we derive lower limits on the rest-frame ultraviolet (UV) luminosity function (LF) at $z\simeq9$-12 and find these lower limits to be consistent with recent photometric measurements. We identify at least two unambiguous and several possible active galactic nucleus (AGN) systems based on X-ray emission, broad line (BL) H$\beta$, high ionization line (e.g., NIV]1487, CIV1549) detections, and excess in UVLF. This requires the AGN LFs at $z\simeq$ 9-10 to be comparable or even higher than the X-ray AGN LF estimated at $z\sim6$ and indicates a plausible cause of the high abundance of $z>9$ galaxies claimed in recent photometric studies may be AGNs. One UV-luminous source is confirmed at the same redshift as a dusty BL AGN at $z=8.50$ with a physical separation of 380 kpc in the source plane. These two sources show blueward Ly$\alpha$ line or continuum emission, suggesting that they reside in the same ionized bubble with a radius of $7.56\pm0.10$ pMpc. Our results imply that AGNs have a non-negligible contribution to cosmic reionization.

Submitted to arXiv on 22 Aug. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2308.11609v1

In this study, the authors present the results of their observations using the JWST NIRSpec prism spectroscopy to study gravitationally lensed galaxies at redshifts greater than 9. These galaxies were found behind the massive galaxy cluster Abell 2744 as part of the UNCOVER Cycle 1 Treasury Program. The main focus of this study is to confirm the redshifts of these high-redshift galaxies and investigate their properties. The authors confirm the source redshift for ten galaxies in the range of z=8.50-13.08 by detecting emission lines and/or the Lyman-alpha break feature. These confirmed sources have ultraviolet (UV) luminosities down to $M_{\rm UV}=-17.3$. The confirmation rate for candidates with redshifts greater than 9 reported in a previous study by Atek et al. (2023) is found to be 100%. When comparing redshift estimates obtained from emission lines and those obtained from the Lyman-alpha break alone using prism, it is found that there can be an offset of up to $\pm0.2$, raising caution in designing future follow-up spectroscopy for sources that rely solely on the Lyman-alpha break. Using both confirmed sources from UNCOVER and literature, lower limits on the rest-frame UV luminosity function (LF) are derived at redshifts approximately between 9 and 12. These lower limits are found to be consistent with recent photometric measurements. The authors also identify several active galactic nucleus (AGN) systems based on X-ray emission, broad line H$\beta$, high ionization line detections (such as NIV]1487 and CIV1549), and excess in UVLF, suggesting that AGNs may contribute significantly to the high abundance of galaxies at redshifts greater than 9 claimed in recent photometric studies. One UV-luminous source is confirmed to be at the same redshift as a dusty broad-line AGN with a physical separation of 380 kpc in the source plane; these two sources show blueward Lyman-alpha line or continuum emission, indicating that they reside in the same ionized bubble with a radius of $7.56\pm0.10$ pMpc.
Created on 07 Sep. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.