Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2309.15217v1

We introduce RAGAs (Retrieval Augmented Generation Assessment), a framework for reference-free evaluation of Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) pipelines. RAG systems consist of a retrieval and an LLM based generation module, which provide LLMs with knowledge from a reference textual database. This enables them to act as a natural language layer between a user and textual databases, reducing the risk of hallucinations. However, evaluating RAG architectures is challenging due to multiple dimensions that need to be considered, such as the ability of the retrieval system to identify relevant context passages, the ability of the LLM to use these passages faithfully, and the quality of the generated output. To address this challenge, we propose RAGAs as a suite of metrics that can evaluate these different dimensions without relying on ground truth human annotations. By providing a framework for faster evaluation cycles of RAG architectures, especially given the fast adoption of LLMs, RAGAs can significantly contribute to improving these systems. In recent years, Language Models (LMs) have become repositories of vast knowledge about the world. They are capable of answering questions without accessing external sources. However, LMs have limitations in answering questions about events that occurred after their training and struggle with memorizing rarely mentioned knowledge in their training corpus. To overcome these limitations, Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) approaches have been introduced. These approaches involve retrieving relevant passages from a corpus and feeding them along with the question to an LM for generating answers. While retrieval-augmented strategies have proven useful, their implementation requires tuning and performance evaluation across various dimensions. The existing methods rely on ground truth human annotations for evaluation, which can be time-consuming and impractical in large-scale applications. In this paper, we propose RAGAs as a reference-free evaluation framework for RAG pipelines. It provides metrics that assess the ability of retrieval systems to identify relevant context passages, the faithful exploitation of these passages by the LLM, and the quality of the generated output. Importantly, RAGAs eliminate the need for human annotations, enabling faster evaluation cycles for RAG architectures. The proposed framework addresses the challenges in evaluating RAG systems and contributes to improving their performance. With the increasing adoption of LLMs in various applications, such as question answering and information retrieval, efficient evaluation methods like RAGAs are crucial. By providing a suite of metrics that can assess different dimensions of RAG architectures without relying on human annotations, RAGAs enable researchers and practitioners to evaluate and refine these systems more efficiently.

• - RAGAs is a framework for reference-free evaluation of Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) pipelines
• - RAG systems consist of retrieval and LLM based generation modules
• - Evaluating RAG architectures is challenging due to multiple dimensions that need to be considered
• - RAGAs propose metrics to evaluate the ability of retrieval systems, faithful exploitation of passages by LLMs, and quality of generated output
• - RAGAs eliminate the need for human annotations, enabling faster evaluation cycles for RAG architectures
• - The proposed framework addresses challenges in evaluating RAG systems and contributes to improving their performance
• - Efficient evaluation methods like RAGAs are crucial with the increasing adoption of LLMs in various applications.

RAGAs is a way to test how well computer programs can find information and generate sentences. RAG systems have two parts: one that finds information and one that makes sentences. Testing RAG systems is hard because there are many things to consider. RAGAs suggest ways to measure how good the information-finding part is, how well the sentence-making part uses the information, and how good the sentences are. RAGAs make it faster to test RAG systems without needing people to help. This helps make RAG systems better, especially with more use of language models in different areas." Definitions- Framework: A way or plan for doing something. - Reference-free evaluation: Testing something without comparing it to other things. - Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG): Computer programs that find information and use it to make sentences. - Modules: Parts or sections of a system that work together. - Metrics: Ways of measuring or testing something. - Exploitation: Making good use of something. - Passages: Pieces of text or writing. - Annotations: Notes or comments made by people on something. - Adoption: The act of using or accepting something.

Introduction: In recent years, Language Models (LMs) have become powerful tools for natural language processing tasks. They are trained on large amounts of text data and can generate human-like text, answer questions, and perform other language-related tasks. However, LMs have limitations in answering questions about events that occurred after their training and struggle with memorizing rarely mentioned knowledge in their training corpus. To overcome these limitations, Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) approaches have been introduced. What is RAG? Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) is a framework that combines the power of retrieval systems with Language Models (LMs). It involves retrieving relevant passages from a corpus and feeding them along with the question to an LM for generating answers. This approach enables LMs to access external sources of information and reduces the risk of generating incorrect or irrelevant responses. Challenges in Evaluating RAG Systems: While retrieval-augmented strategies have proven useful, their implementation requires tuning and performance evaluation across various dimensions. The existing methods rely on ground truth human annotations for evaluation, which can be time-consuming and impractical in large-scale applications. Additionally, evaluating RAG architectures is challenging due to multiple dimensions that need to be considered. Introducing RAGAs: To address these challenges, researchers have proposed RAGAs (Retrieval Augmented Generation Assessment), a framework for reference-free evaluation of RAG pipelines. It provides metrics that assess the ability of retrieval systems to identify relevant context passages, the faithful exploitation of these passages by the LLM, and the quality of the generated output. How Does RAGAs Work? RAGAs evaluates different dimensions without relying on ground truth human annotations. It works by comparing the retrieved passages with a reference database using similarity measures such as cosine similarity or BM25 score. These measures indicate how well the retrieved passage aligns with the reference database. Next, it evaluates how well the LLM utilizes the retrieved passages by comparing the generated output with the reference answer. This step ensures that the LLM is using the relevant information from the retrieved passage to generate accurate responses. Finally, RAGAs assesses the quality of the generated output by comparing it with human-generated responses. This step ensures that RAG systems are generating high-quality and human-like responses. Benefits of RAGAs: By providing a framework for faster evaluation cycles of RAG architectures, especially given the fast adoption of LMs, RAGAs can significantly contribute to improving these systems. The proposed framework eliminates the need for human annotations, enabling researchers and practitioners to evaluate and refine these systems more efficiently. Conclusion: In conclusion, Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) approaches have shown promising results in overcoming limitations faced by Language Models (LMs). However, evaluating these architectures is challenging due to multiple dimensions that need to be considered. To address this challenge, researchers have introduced RAGAs as a reference-free evaluation framework for RAG pipelines. By providing a suite of metrics that can assess different dimensions without relying on human annotations, RAGAs enable efficient evaluation and refinement of these systems. With the increasing adoption of LMs in various applications, such as question answering and information retrieval, efficient evaluation methods like RAGAs are crucial for further advancements in this field.