Improved Techniques for Training Consistency Models
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Consistency models in generative modeling are a promising approach for high-quality data generation without adversarial training
- Existing methods face limitations like reliance on pre-trained models and bias in evaluation metrics like LPIPS
- Recent study by Yang Song and Prafulla Dhariwal introduces advanced techniques for training consistency models, including eliminating Exponential Moving Average from teacher consistency model
- Proposed method allows consistency models to learn directly from data, enhancing their ability to generate high-quality samples independently
- Researchers leverage Pseudo-Huber losses from robust statistics to replace biased metrics like LPIPS, improving evaluation process and overall performance of consistency models
- Introduction of lognormal noise schedule and strategy to double total discretization steps at regular intervals during training iterations enhances performance of consistency models
- Refined consistency models achieve remarkable results on benchmark datasets with FID scores of 2.51 and 3.25 on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet $64\times 64$ respectively in one sampling step, showcasing significant improvement in sample quality compared to previous methods
- Two-step sampling strategies further reduce FID scores to 2.24 and 2.77 on these datasets, surpassing distillation-based results while narrowing the performance gap with state-of-the-art generative models
Authors: Yang Song, Prafulla Dhariwal
Abstract: Consistency models are a nascent family of generative models that can sample high quality data in one step without the need for adversarial training. Current consistency models achieve optimal sample quality by distilling from pre-trained diffusion models and employing learned metrics such as LPIPS. However, distillation limits the quality of consistency models to that of the pre-trained diffusion model, and LPIPS causes undesirable bias in evaluation. To tackle these challenges, we present improved techniques for consistency training, where consistency models learn directly from data without distillation. We delve into the theory behind consistency training and identify a previously overlooked flaw, which we address by eliminating Exponential Moving Average from the teacher consistency model. To replace learned metrics like LPIPS, we adopt Pseudo-Huber losses from robust statistics. Additionally, we introduce a lognormal noise schedule for the consistency training objective, and propose to double total discretization steps every set number of training iterations. Combined with better hyperparameter tuning, these modifications enable consistency models to achieve FID scores of 2.51 and 3.25 on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet $64\times 64$ respectively in a single sampling step. These scores mark a 3.5$\times$ and 4$\times$ improvement compared to prior consistency training approaches. Through two-step sampling, we further reduce FID scores to 2.24 and 2.77 on these two datasets, surpassing those obtained via distillation in both one-step and two-step settings, while narrowing the gap between consistency models and other state-of-the-art generative models.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.