Scalable Extraction of Training Data from (Production) Language Models

AI-generated keywords: Extractable Memorization Language Models Divergence Attack Alignment Techniques Security

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Extractable memorization: ability to extract training data from machine learning models without prior knowledge of the dataset
  • Adversaries can extract gigabytes of training data from various language models (Pythia, GPT-Neo, LLaMA, Falcon, ChatGPT)
  • Existing techniques effective for attacking unaligned models
  • New divergence attack strategy developed for attacking aligned models like ChatGPT
  • Divergence attack causes model to deviate from chatbot-style responses and emit training data at a significantly higher rate (150 times more)
  • Practical attacks can recover more data than previously anticipated
  • Current alignment techniques do not eliminate memorization entirely
  • Findings emphasize the importance of addressing extractable memorization for improved security and privacy.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Milad Nasr, Nicholas Carlini, Jonathan Hayase, Matthew Jagielski, A. Feder Cooper, Daphne Ippolito, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Eric Wallace, Florian Tramèr, Katherine Lee

Abstract: This paper studies extractable memorization: training data that an adversary can efficiently extract by querying a machine learning model without prior knowledge of the training dataset. We show an adversary can extract gigabytes of training data from open-source language models like Pythia or GPT-Neo, semi-open models like LLaMA or Falcon, and closed models like ChatGPT. Existing techniques from the literature suffice to attack unaligned models; in order to attack the aligned ChatGPT, we develop a new divergence attack that causes the model to diverge from its chatbot-style generations and emit training data at a rate 150x higher than when behaving properly. Our methods show practical attacks can recover far more data than previously thought, and reveal that current alignment techniques do not eliminate memorization.

Submitted to arXiv on 28 Nov. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2311.17035v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

This paper titled "Scalable Extraction of Training Data from (Production) Language Models" explores the concept of extractable memorization, which refers to the ability of an adversary to efficiently extract training data from a machine learning model without any prior knowledge of the training dataset. The authors demonstrate that adversaries can successfully extract gigabytes of training data from various types of language models, including open-source models like Pythia or GPT-Neo, semi-open models like LLaMA or Falcon, and closed models like ChatGPT. The study reveals that existing techniques from the literature are effective in attacking unaligned models. However, to attack aligned models such as ChatGPT, the authors develop a new divergence attack strategy. This technique causes the model to deviate from its typical chatbot-style responses and instead emit training data at a significantly higher rate—150 times more than when it behaves correctly. By employing these methods, the researchers demonstrate that practical attacks can recover far more data than previously anticipated. The findings also indicate that current alignment techniques do not eliminate memorization entirely. The results presented in this paper provide insight into the vulnerabilities of language models and emphasize the importance of addressing extractable memorization for improved security and privacy.
Created on 30 Nov. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.