CEERS: Increasing Scatter along the Star-Forming Main Sequence Indicates Early Galaxies Form in Bursts

AI-generated keywords: CEERS survey

AI-generated Key Points

  • CEERS survey presents the SFR-M$_\ast$ relation for galaxies at redshifts $4.5\leq z\leq 12$
  • Photometry of galaxies in rest-UV and rest-optical bands from \jwst\ and \hst\ is modeled using flexible SFHs with \bagpipes
  • SFRs are averaged over 10~Myr (\sfrten) and 100~Myr (\sfrcen)
  • Larger scatter in $\sfrten-M_\ast$ relation compared to $\sfrcen-M_\ast$ relation at redshifts $z\sim 5-9$
  • Scatter increases with redshift and increasing stellar mass up to $z\sim 7, suggesting increase in star formation variability
  • Ratio $R_\mathrm{SFR}=\log(\sfrten/\sfrcen)$ decreases on average with increasing stellar mass and redshift
  • Star formation "duty cycle" of approximately 40% for galaxies with $\log M_\ast/M_\odot\geq 9.3$ at $z\sim5$, declining to about 20% at $z\sim9$
  • Longer lulls in star formation at higher redshift and higher stellar mass, transitioning from periods of higher SFR variability at $z\gtrsim~6$ to smoother SFR evolution at $z\lesssim~4.5$
  • Insights into the formation and evolution of galaxies in the early universe
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Justin W. Cole, Casey Papovich, Steven L. Finkelstein, Micaela B. Bagley, Mark Dickinson, Kartheik G. Iyer, L. Y. Aaron Yung, Laure Ciesla, Ricardo O. Amorin, Pablo Arrabal Haro, Rachana Bhatawdekar, Antonello Calabro, Nikko J. Cleri, Alexander de la Vega, Avishai Dekel, Ryan Endsley, Eric Gawiser, Mauro Giavalisco, Nimish P. Hathi, Michaela Hirschmann, Benne W. Holwerda, Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe, Anton M. Koekemoer, Ray A. Lucas, Sara Mascia, Bahram Mobasher, Pablo G. Perez-Gonzalez, Giulia Rodighiero, Kaila Ronayne, Sandro Tachhella, Benjamin J. Weiner, Stephen M. Wilkins

arXiv: 2312.10152v1 - DOI (astro-ph.GA)
28 pages, 12 figures, 2 Appendix figures
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: We present the star-formation-rate -- stellar-mass (SFR-M$_\ast$) relation for galaxies in the CEERS survey at $4.5\leq z\leq 12$. We model the \jwst\ and \hst\ rest-UV and rest-optical photometry of galaxies with flexible star-formation histories (SFHs) using \bagpipes. We consider SFRs averaged from the SFHs over 10~Myr (\sfrten) and 100~Myr (\sfrcen), where the photometry probes SFRs on these timescales, effectively tracing nebular emission lines in the rest-optical (on $\sim10$~Myr timescales) and the UV/optical continuum (on $\sim100$ Myr timescales). We measure the slope, normalization and intrinsic scatter of the SFR-M$_\ast$ relation, taking into account the uncertainty and the covariance of galaxy SFRs and $M_\ast$. From $z\sim 5-9$ there is larger scatter in the $\sfrten-M_\ast$ relation, with $\sigma(\log \sfrcen)=0.4$~dex, compared to the $\sfrcen-M_\ast$ relation, with $\sigma(\log \sfrten)=0.1$~dex. This scatter increases with redshift and increasing stellar mass, at least out to $z\sim 7$. These results can be explained if galaxies at higher redshift experience an increase in star-formation variability and form primarily in short, active periods, followed by a lull in star formation (i.e. ``napping'' phases). We see a significant trend in the ratio $R_\mathrm{SFR}=\log(\sfrten/\sfrcen)$ in which, on average, $R_\mathrm{SFR}$ decreases with increasing stellar mass and increasing redshift. This yields a star-formation ``duty cycle'' of $\sim40\%$ for galaxies with $\log M_\ast/M_\odot\geq 9.3$, at $z\sim5$, declining to $\sim20\%$ at $z\sim9$. Galaxies also experience longer lulls in star formation at higher redshift and at higher stellar mass, such that galaxies transition from periods of higher SFR variability at $z\gtrsim~6$ to smoother SFR evolution at $z\lesssim~4.5$.

Submitted to arXiv on 15 Dec. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2312.10152v1

, , , , The CEERS survey presents the star-formation-rate (SFR)-stellar-mass (M$_\ast$) relation for galaxies at redshifts $4.5\leq z\leq 12$. The photometry of galaxies in the rest-UV and rest-optical bands from \jwst\ and \hst\ is modeled using flexible star-formation histories (SFHs) with the help of \bagpipes. The SFRs are averaged over 10~Myr (\sfrten) and 100~Myr (\sfrcen), effectively tracing nebular emission lines in the rest-optical (on $\sim10$~Myr timescales) and the UV/optical continuum (on $\sim100$ Myr timescales). The slope, normalization, and intrinsic scatter of the SFR-M$_\ast$ relation are measured, accounting for uncertainties and covariances of galaxy SFRs and $M_\ast$. Results show larger scatter in the $\sfrten-M_\ast$ relation compared to the $\sfrcen-M_\ast$ relation at redshifts $z\sim 5-9$, with $\sigma(\log \sfrcen)=0.4$~dex and $\sigma(\log \sfrten)=0.1$~dex respectively. This scatter increases with redshift and increasing stellar mass up to $z\sim 7$, suggesting an increase in star-formation variability for galaxies at higher redshift. A significant trend is observed in the ratio $R_\mathrm{SFR}=\log(\sfrten/\sfrcen)$, which decreases on average with increasing stellar mass and redshift. This indicates a star-formation "duty cycle" of approximately 40% for galaxies with $\log M_\ast/M_\odot\geq 9.3$ at $z\sim5$, declining to about 20% at $z\sim9$. Furthermore, galaxies experience longer lulls in star formation at higher redshift and higher stellar mass, transitioning from periods of higher SFR variability at $z\gtrsim~6$ to smoother SFR evolution at $z\lesssim~4.5$. These findings provide valuable insights into the formation and evolution of galaxies in the early universe.
Created on 09 Jan. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.