Analysis of quantum Krylov algorithms with errors
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Quantum Krylov algorithms are used for estimating ground state energies in quantum systems
- Errors can affect the accuracy of these algorithms' outputs
- The author introduces a collective noise rate to quantify the overall impact of errors on the algorithm's results
- The main objective is to determine how errors affect the estimation of ground state energy
- Rigorous mathematical analysis shows that errors have a linear dependence on the noise rate
- This resolves a discrepancy between previous theoretical analyses and numerical simulations
- Generic errors are expressed in terms of an effective target Hamiltonian studied within an effective Krylov space
- This approach allows for comprehensive characterization and quantification of error effects on ground state energy estimates
- The research contributes to establishing a theoretical framework for understanding and managing errors in quantum Krylov algorithms
Authors: William Kirby
Abstract: This work provides an error analysis of quantum Krylov algorithms based on real-time evolutions, subject to generic errors in the outputs of the quantum circuits. We establish a collective noise rate to summarize those errors, and prove that the resulting errors in the ground state energy estimates are leading-order linear in that noise rate. This resolves a misalignment between known numerics, which exhibit this linear scaling, and prior theoretical analysis, which only provably obtained square-root scaling. Our main technique is expressing generic errors in terms of an effective target Hamiltonian studied in an effective Krylov space. These results provide a theoretical framework for understanding the main features of quantum Krylov errors.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.