This paper explores the performance of "generalized state space models" (GSSMs) compared to transformer models in tasks involving copying from input context. While GSSMs are appealing for their inference-time efficiency, the authors demonstrate that they have limitations compared to transformers. The authors begin by conducting a theoretical analysis on the task of string copying and prove that a two-layer transformer can copy strings of exponential length. This is in contrast to GSSMs which are fundamentally limited by their fixed-size latent state. This theoretical result highlights the advantage of transformers in handling tasks that require copying from context. To validate their findings empirically, experiments are performed on synthetic tasks requiring copying from context. The results show that transformers outperform GSSMs in terms of efficiency and generalization on these tasks, further supporting their superiority for such tasks. Additionally, pretrained large language models are evaluated and it is found that transformer models significantly outperform state space models at both copying and retrieving information from context. These findings suggest a fundamental gap between transformers and GSSMs in practical applications. Overall, this study provides insights into the limitations of GSSMs compared to transformer models when it comes to tasks requiring copying from input context. The results highlight the superior performance and efficiency of transformers in such scenarios, emphasizing their dominance as the preferred architecture for sequence modeling.
- GSSMs (generalized state space models) compared to transformer models in copying tasks from input context
- Theoretical analysis shows that a two-layer transformer can copy strings of exponential length, while GSSMs are limited by fixed-size latent state
- Empirical experiments confirm that transformers outperform GSSMs in efficiency and generalization on synthetic tasks requiring copying from context
- Pretrained large language models also show significant superiority of transformer models over state space models in copying and retrieving information from context
- Transformers demonstrate superior performance and efficiency compared to GSSMs in tasks involving copying from input context
- GSSMs (generalized state space models) are compared to transformer models in tasks where information needs to be copied from an input context.
- Theoretical analysis shows that a two-layer transformer can copy very long strings, while GSSMs are limited by a fixed-size latent state.
- Empirical experiments confirm that transformers are better and more flexible than GSSMs in synthetic tasks that require copying from context.
- Pretrained large language models also show that transformer models are much better than state space models in copying and retrieving information from context.
- Transformers perform better and faster than GSSMs in tasks that involve copying from an input context.
Introduction
In recent years, transformer models have emerged as a dominant architecture for sequence modeling tasks. These models have shown impressive performance in various natural language processing (NLP) tasks such as machine translation, text summarization, and question answering. However, their success has raised questions about the limitations of other traditional architectures such as generalized state space models (GSSMs). In this paper, the authors explore the performance of GSSMs compared to transformer models in tasks involving copying from input context.
Theoretical Analysis
To begin with, the authors conduct a theoretical analysis on the task of string copying. This task involves copying a string from an input context and producing an output that is identical to the input. The authors prove that a two-layer transformer can copy strings of exponential length while GSSMs are fundamentally limited by their fixed-size latent state. This result highlights the advantage of transformers in handling tasks that require copying from context.
Empirical Experiments
To validate their findings empirically, experiments are performed on synthetic tasks requiring copying from context. The results show that transformers outperform GSSMs in terms of efficiency and generalization on these tasks. This further supports their superiority for such tasks.
Comparison with Pretrained Language Models
Additionally, pretrained large language models such as BERT and GPT-2 are evaluated on these tasks. It is found that transformer models significantly outperform state space models at both copying and retrieving information from context. These findings suggest a fundamental gap between transformers and GSSMs in practical applications.
Limitations of GSSMs
Based on these results, it can be concluded that GSSMs have limitations when it comes to handling tasks involving copying from input context. Their fixed-size latent state makes them less efficient compared to transformers which can handle longer sequences without any constraints.
Implications for Sequence Modeling Tasks
This study provides important insights into the limitations of GSSMs compared to transformer models when it comes to tasks requiring copying from input context. The results highlight the superior performance and efficiency of transformers in such scenarios, emphasizing their dominance as the preferred architecture for sequence modeling.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this paper presents a detailed analysis of the performance of GSSMs compared to transformer models in tasks involving copying from input context. The theoretical analysis and empirical experiments both demonstrate that transformers have an advantage over GSSMs in terms of efficiency and generalization on these tasks. This study highlights the fundamental gap between these two architectures and provides important implications for future research in sequence modeling.
