In their paper titled "Privacy-Preserving Instructions for Aligning Large Language Models," authors Da Yu, Peter Kairouz, Sewoong Oh, and Zheng Xu address the privacy risks associated with collecting user instructions for large language model (LLM) applications. These instructions, which may contain sensitive information, are typically annotated by human workers during the alignment process. To mitigate this privacy risk, the authors propose using synthetic instructions instead of real ones for data annotation and model fine-tuning. By generating these synthetic instructions using privately fine-tuned generators, formal differential privacy is ensured. A key aspect of their approach is a novel filtering algorithm that matches the distribution of synthetic instructions to that of real ones, thereby preserving utility in the alignment process. Through extensive experiments involving supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning from human feedback, the authors demonstrate the high utility of synthetic instructions by achieving comparable results to real instructions. In fact, models trained with private synthetic instructions outperform leading open-source models like Vicuna in supervised fine-tuning tasks. Overall, this research highlights the importance of addressing privacy concerns in LLM applications and provides a promising solution through the use of synthetic instructions while maintaining performance levels comparable to real data annotation methods. <|endoftext|># -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
"""
Created on Wed Apr 29 18:48:49 2020
@Author: yichao.li
@Description This script is used to generate fake data based on given parameters.
- - Authors: Da Yu, Peter Kairouz, Sewoong Oh, Zheng Xu
- - Privacy risks in collecting user instructions for large language model (LLM) applications
- - Proposal of using synthetic instructions instead of real ones for data annotation and model fine-tuning
- - Generation of synthetic instructions using privately fine-tuned generators to ensure formal differential privacy
- - Novel filtering algorithm matching the distribution of synthetic instructions to real ones to preserve utility in the alignment process
- - Demonstrated high utility of synthetic instructions through experiments in supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning from human feedback
- - Models trained with private synthetic instructions outperform leading open-source models like Vicuna in supervised fine-tuning tasks
Summary- Authors Da Yu, Peter Kairouz, Sewoong Oh, and Zheng Xu studied privacy risks in collecting user instructions for big language model applications.
- They suggest using synthetic instructions instead of real ones for labeling data and improving the model.
- Synthetic instructions are created using privately fine-tuned generators to protect user privacy.
- A new filtering algorithm is used to match the distribution of synthetic instructions with real ones while maintaining usefulness in training the model.
- Experiments showed that models trained with private synthetic instructions perform better than existing open-source models like Vicuna in certain tasks.
Definitions- Authors: People who write books, articles, or research papers.
- Privacy risks: Potential dangers related to keeping personal information safe from unauthorized access or use.
- Synthetic: Artificially created or manufactured rather than natural or real.
- Fine-tuning: Adjusting or improving something to make it work better for a specific purpose.
- Differential privacy: A method of protecting individual data while still allowing useful insights to be drawn from it.
Introduction
Large language models (LLMs) have become increasingly popular in natural language processing tasks such as machine translation, text summarization, and question-answering. These models are trained on massive amounts of data and can generate human-like text with high accuracy. However, the collection of user instructions for LLM applications raises privacy concerns as these instructions may contain sensitive information.
In their paper titled "Privacy-Preserving Instructions for Aligning Large Language Models," authors Da Yu, Peter Kairouz, Sewoong Oh, and Zheng Xu address this issue by proposing a novel approach to protect user privacy while maintaining the utility of LLMs.
The Privacy Risk
The alignment process for LLMs involves annotating user instructions to fine-tune the model. This annotation is typically done by human workers who may have access to sensitive information contained in these instructions. As a result, there is a risk of this private information being exposed or misused.
To address this risk, the authors propose using synthetic instructions instead of real ones for data annotation and model fine-tuning.
The Proposed Solution
The authors' solution involves generating synthetic instructions using privately fine-tuned generators. This ensures formal differential privacy which guarantees that an individual's data cannot be distinguished from others in the dataset.
A key aspect of their approach is a filtering algorithm that matches the distribution of synthetic instructions to that of real ones. This preserves utility in the alignment process while protecting user privacy.
Experimental Results
To evaluate their proposed method, the authors conducted extensive experiments involving supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning from human feedback. They compared models trained with private synthetic instructions against those trained with real annotations and leading open-source models like Vicuna.
Their results show that models trained with private synthetic instructions achieve comparable performance levels to those trained with real annotations. In fact, they outperform Vicuna in supervised fine-tuning tasks.
Conclusion
The research conducted by Da Yu and his team highlights the importance of addressing privacy concerns in LLM applications. By using synthetic instructions instead of real ones for data annotation and model fine-tuning, user privacy can be protected while maintaining high levels of utility.
This approach has shown promising results in various experiments and could potentially be applied to other machine learning tasks as well. As LLMs continue to play a significant role in natural language processing, it is crucial to consider the privacy implications and adopt measures to protect user data. The proposed solution provides a viable option for achieving this goal without compromising on performance. <|endoftext|># -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
"""
Created on Tue Jul 28 11:25:33 2020
Author: Rounak
Description:
This script generates an interactive map showing the distribution of
COVID-19 cases across India.
"""
import pandas as pd
import geopandas as gpd
import plotly.express as px
def get_data():
# Load statewise data from covid19india.org
url = 'https://api.covid19india.org/csv/latest/state_wise.csv'
df = pd.read_csv(url)
# Get only states/UTs level data (excluding district level)
df = df[df['State_code'] != 'UN']
return df
def merge_data(df):
# Load Indian states shapefile from github repo
url = 'https://raw.githubusercontent.com/geohacker/india/master/state/india_telengana.geojson'
# Read shapefile using Geopandas
# Note that this file contains both Telangana & Andhra Pradesh,
# so we need to filter out AP before merging with our dataframe
# Read shapefile
map_df = gpd.read_file(url)
# Filter out AP from the dataframe
map_df = map_df[map_df['st_nm'] != 'Andhra Pradesh']
# Merge dataframes
merged_data = pd.merge(map_df, df, left_on='st_nm', right_on='State')
return merged_data
def plot_map(merged_data):
# Plot interactive choropleth map using Plotly Express
fig = px.choropleth(
merged_data,
geojson=merged_data.geometry,
locations=merged_data.index,
color="Confirmed",
hover_name="State",
hover_data=["Active", "Recovered", "Deaths"],
title="COVID-19 Cases in India (as of 28 July 2020)",
)
fig.update_geos(fitbounds="locations", visible=False)
fig.show()
if __name__ == '__main__':
df = get_data()
merged_data = merge_data(df)
plot_map(merged_data)<|endoftext|>x=int(input("Enter a number: "))
y=int(input("Enter another number: "))
z=x+y
print("The sum of ",x," and ",y," is ",z)<|endoftext|> //----------Shop_spu_evaluate_reply开始----------
using System;
namespace ShopMall.Model.Models
{
///
/// Shop_spu_evaluate_reply
///
public class Shop_spu_evaluate_reply
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public int? EvaluateId { get; set; }
public string ReplyContent { get; set; }
public DateTime? CreateTime { get; set; }
}
}
//----------Shop_spu_evaluate_reply结束----------
<|endoftext|>## 2. Introduction to the data ##
import pandas as pd
all_ages = pd.read_csv("all-ages.csv")
recent_grads = pd.read_csv("recent-grads.csv")
print(all_ages.head(5))
print(recent_grads.head(5))
## 3. Summarizing major categories ##
# Unique values in Major_category column.
print(all_ages['Major_category'].unique())
aa_cat_counts = dict()
rg_cat_counts = dict()
for cat in all_ages['Major_category'].unique():
# Select only rows where Major_category is cat.
major_df = all_ages[all_ages["Major_category"] == cat]
# Calculate the total number of people who fall under each Major_category for both DataFrames.
aa_cat_counts[cat] = sum(major_df["Total"])
for cat in recent_grads['Major_category'].unique():
# Select only rows where Major_category is cat.
major_df_rg = recent_grads[recent_grads["Major_category"] == cat]
# Calculate the total number of people who fall under each Major_category for both DataFrames.
rg_cat_counts[cat] = sum(major_df_rg["Total"])
## 4. Low-wage job rates ##
low_wage_percent_all_ages=0
low_wage_percent_recent_grads=0
low_wage_jobs_sum_allAges=all_ages['Low_wage_jobs'].sum()
total_sum_allAges=all_ages['Total'].sum()
low_wage_jobs_sum_recentGrads=recent_grads['Low_wage_jobs'].sum()
total_sum_recentGrads=recent_grads['Total'].