Computational supremacy in quantum simulation

AI-generated keywords: Quantum Computing Magnetic Spin Systems Computational Supremacy Quantum Annealing Tensor Networks

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Quantum computing offers the potential to solve complex problems beyond classical computers
  • Simulating nonequilibrium dynamics of magnetic spin systems undergoing quantum phase transitions is a challenging task
  • Superconducting quantum annealing processors have shown promising results in generating samples aligning with solutions from the Schrödinger equation
  • Quantum annealers exhibit area-law scaling of entanglement in spin glass models across dimensions
  • Comparison with approximate methods shows quantum annealers outperform existing approaches in accuracy within a reasonable timeframe
  • Quantum computers have unique capabilities to address practical questions beyond classical computing systems
  • Research highlights computational supremacy of quantum simulation in tackling intricate problems like nonequilibrium dynamics in magnetic spin systems
  • Implications suggest quantum computers may unlock new frontiers in scientific research and problem-solving previously unattainable using classical computing methodologies
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Andrew D. King, Alberto Nocera, Marek M. Rams, Jacek Dziarmaga, Roeland Wiersema, William Bernoudy, Jack Raymond, Nitin Kaushal, Niclas Heinsdorf, Richard Harris, Kelly Boothby, Fabio Altomare, Andrew J. Berkley, Martin Boschnak, Kevin Chern, Holly Christiani, Samantha Cibere, Jake Connor, Martin H. Dehn, Rahul Deshpande, Sara Ejtemaee, Pau Farré, Kelsey Hamer, Emile Hoskinson, Shuiyuan Huang, Mark W. Johnson, Samuel Kortas, Eric Ladizinsky, Tony Lai, Trevor Lanting, Ryan Li, Allison J. R. MacDonald, Gaelen Marsden, Catherine C. McGeoch, Reza Molavi, Richard Neufeld, Mana Norouzpour, Travis Oh, Joel Pasvolsky, Patrick Poitras, Gabriel Poulin-Lamarre, Thomas Prescott, Mauricio Reis, Chris Rich, Mohammad Samani, Benjamin Sheldan, Anatoly Smirnov, Edward Sterpka, Berta Trullas Clavera, Nicholas Tsai, Mark Volkmann, Alexander Whiticar, Jed D. Whittaker, Warren Wilkinson, Jason Yao, T. J. Yi, Anders W. Sandvik, Gonzalo Alvarez, Roger G. Melko, Juan Carrasquilla, Marcel Franz, Mohammad H. Amin

arXiv: 2403.00910v1 - DOI (quant-ph)

Abstract: Quantum computers hold the promise of solving certain problems that lie beyond the reach of conventional computers. Establishing this capability, especially for impactful and meaningful problems, remains a central challenge. One such problem is the simulation of nonequilibrium dynamics of a magnetic spin system quenched through a quantum phase transition. State-of-the-art classical simulations demand resources that grow exponentially with system size. Here we show that superconducting quantum annealing processors can rapidly generate samples in close agreement with solutions of the Schr\"odinger equation. We demonstrate area-law scaling of entanglement in the model quench in two-, three- and infinite-dimensional spin glasses, supporting the observed stretched-exponential scaling of effort for classical approaches. We assess approximate methods based on tensor networks and neural networks and conclude that no known approach can achieve the same accuracy as the quantum annealer within a reasonable timeframe. Thus quantum annealers can answer questions of practical importance that classical computers cannot.

Submitted to arXiv on 01 Mar. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2403.00910v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the realm of quantum computing, the potential for solving complex problems that are beyond the capabilities of classical computers is a tantalizing prospect. One such challenge lies in simulating the nonequilibrium dynamics of a magnetic spin system undergoing a quantum phase transition. This task stretches the limits of traditional computational methods due to exponential resource requirements as system size grows. However, recent advancements in superconducting quantum annealing processors have shown promising results in rapidly generating samples that closely align with solutions derived from the Schrödinger equation. In a groundbreaking study led by Andrew D. King, Alberto Nocera, and their team of esteemed researchers (including Marek M. Rams and Jacek Dziarmaga), it was demonstrated that these quantum annealers exhibit area-law scaling of entanglement in various spin glass models across different dimensions. The research further delves into comparing these quantum annealing results with approximate methods based on tensor networks and neural networks. The conclusion drawn is striking: no existing approach can match the accuracy achieved by quantum annealers within a reasonable timeframe. This finding underscores the unique capability of quantum computers to address practical questions that remain out of reach for classical computing systems. With contributions from an extensive list of collaborators including Roeland Wiersema, William Bernoudy, and Jack Raymond among others, this study sheds light on the computational supremacy exhibited by quantum simulation in tackling intricate problems like nonequilibrium dynamics in magnetic spin systems. The implications are profound, pointing towards a future where quantum computers may unlock new frontiers in scientific research and problem-solving that were previously deemed unattainable using classical computing methodologies.
Created on 13 Mar. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: -1

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.