The SAGA Survey. III. A Census of 101 Satellite Systems around Milky Way-mass Galaxies
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The SAGA Survey's third Data Release (DR3) provides a census of satellite galaxies around Milky Way (MW)-mass galaxies.
- 378 satellites identified across 101 MW-mass systems within a distance range of 25-40.75 Mpc.
- Redshift catalog of background galaxies with approximately 46,000 entries covering an impressive footprint of 84.7 sq. deg.
- Sample accounts for an impressive 94% completeness down to a stellar mass of 10^7.5 solar masses.
- Most massive satellite in SAGA systems is the strongest predictor of satellite abundance.
- One-third of SAGA systems contain Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC)-mass satellites and tend to host more satellites compared to the MW itself.
- Radial distribution of SAGA satellites appears less concentrated than that of the MW's satellites.
- Quenched fraction below 10^8.5 solar masses is lower in SAGA systems compared to the MW, but both show similar system-to-system scatter within one sigma.
- Contrary to previous suggestions, there is no clear corotating signal in SAGA satellites compared to MW/M31 satellite systems.
- Differences between the MW and typical SAGA systems can be reconciled by considering the age and mass differences, as well as recent accretion history.
Authors: Yao-Yuan Mao (U Utah), Marla Geha (Yale), Risa H. Wechsler (Stanford/SLAC/KIPAC), Yasmeen Asali (Yale), Yunchong Wang (Stanford/SLAC/KIPAC), Erin Kado-Fong (Yale), Nitya Kallivayalil (U Virginia), Ethan O. Nadler (Carnegie Obs), Erik J. Tollerud (STScI), Benjamin Weiner (U Arizona/Steward), Mithi A. C. de los Reyes (Amherst College), John F. Wu (STScI)
Abstract: We present the third Data Release (DR3) of the Satellites Around Galactic Analogs (SAGA) Survey, a spectroscopic survey characterizing satellite galaxies around Milky Way (MW)-mass galaxies. The SAGA Survey DR3 includes 378 satellites identified across 101 MW-mass systems in the distance range 25-40.75 Mpc, and an accompanying redshift catalog of background galaxies (including about 46,000 taken by SAGA) in the SAGA footprint of 84.7 sq. deg. The number of confirmed satellites per system ranges from zero to 13, in the stellar mass range 10^6 to 10^10 solar masses. Based on a detailed completeness model, this sample accounts for 94% of the true satellite population down to a stellar mass of 10^7.5 solar masses. We find that the mass of the most massive satellite in SAGA systems is the strongest predictor of satellite abundance; one-third of the SAGA systems contain LMC-mass satellites, and they tend to have more satellites than the MW. The SAGA satellite radial distribution is less concentrated than the MW, and the SAGA quenched fraction below 10^8.5 solar masses is lower than the MW, but in both cases, the MW is within 1 sigma of SAGA system-to-system scatter. SAGA satellites do not exhibit a clear corotating signal as has been suggested in the MW/M31 satellite systems. Although the MW differs in many respects from the typical SAGA system, these differences can be reconciled if the MW is an older, slightly less massive host with a recently accreted LMC/SMC system.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.