The SAGA Survey. III. A Census of 101 Satellite Systems around Milky Way-mass Galaxies

AI-generated keywords: SAGA Survey satellite galaxies Milky Way-mass galaxies completeness model Large Magellanic Cloud

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The SAGA Survey's third Data Release (DR3) provides a census of satellite galaxies around Milky Way (MW)-mass galaxies.
  • 378 satellites identified across 101 MW-mass systems within a distance range of 25-40.75 Mpc.
  • Redshift catalog of background galaxies with approximately 46,000 entries covering an impressive footprint of 84.7 sq. deg.
  • Sample accounts for an impressive 94% completeness down to a stellar mass of 10^7.5 solar masses.
  • Most massive satellite in SAGA systems is the strongest predictor of satellite abundance.
  • One-third of SAGA systems contain Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC)-mass satellites and tend to host more satellites compared to the MW itself.
  • Radial distribution of SAGA satellites appears less concentrated than that of the MW's satellites.
  • Quenched fraction below 10^8.5 solar masses is lower in SAGA systems compared to the MW, but both show similar system-to-system scatter within one sigma.
  • Contrary to previous suggestions, there is no clear corotating signal in SAGA satellites compared to MW/M31 satellite systems.
  • Differences between the MW and typical SAGA systems can be reconciled by considering the age and mass differences, as well as recent accretion history.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Yao-Yuan Mao (U Utah), Marla Geha (Yale), Risa H. Wechsler (Stanford/SLAC/KIPAC), Yasmeen Asali (Yale), Yunchong Wang (Stanford/SLAC/KIPAC), Erin Kado-Fong (Yale), Nitya Kallivayalil (U Virginia), Ethan O. Nadler (Carnegie Obs), Erik J. Tollerud (STScI), Benjamin Weiner (U Arizona/Steward), Mithi A. C. de los Reyes (Amherst College), John F. Wu (STScI)

arXiv: 2404.14498v1 - DOI (astro-ph.GA)
38 pages, 22 figures, 7 tables. This paper is part of the SAGA Survey Data Release 3. Survey website: https://sagasurvey.org/

Abstract: We present the third Data Release (DR3) of the Satellites Around Galactic Analogs (SAGA) Survey, a spectroscopic survey characterizing satellite galaxies around Milky Way (MW)-mass galaxies. The SAGA Survey DR3 includes 378 satellites identified across 101 MW-mass systems in the distance range 25-40.75 Mpc, and an accompanying redshift catalog of background galaxies (including about 46,000 taken by SAGA) in the SAGA footprint of 84.7 sq. deg. The number of confirmed satellites per system ranges from zero to 13, in the stellar mass range 10^6 to 10^10 solar masses. Based on a detailed completeness model, this sample accounts for 94% of the true satellite population down to a stellar mass of 10^7.5 solar masses. We find that the mass of the most massive satellite in SAGA systems is the strongest predictor of satellite abundance; one-third of the SAGA systems contain LMC-mass satellites, and they tend to have more satellites than the MW. The SAGA satellite radial distribution is less concentrated than the MW, and the SAGA quenched fraction below 10^8.5 solar masses is lower than the MW, but in both cases, the MW is within 1 sigma of SAGA system-to-system scatter. SAGA satellites do not exhibit a clear corotating signal as has been suggested in the MW/M31 satellite systems. Although the MW differs in many respects from the typical SAGA system, these differences can be reconciled if the MW is an older, slightly less massive host with a recently accreted LMC/SMC system.

Submitted to arXiv on 22 Apr. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2404.14498v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The SAGA Survey has released its third Data Release (DR3), providing a comprehensive census of satellite galaxies around Milky Way (MW)-mass galaxies. The latest release includes 378 identified satellites across 101 MW-mass systems within a distance range of 25-40.75 Mpc. Along with this, the survey also features a redshift catalog of background galaxies with approximately 46,000 entries taken by SAGA and covering an impressive footprint of 84.7 sq. deg. Through a detailed completeness model, the sample accounts for an impressive 94% of the true satellite population down to a stellar mass of 10^7.5 solar masses. Interestingly, the most massive satellite in SAGA systems emerges as the strongest predictor of satellite abundance. One-third of the SAGA systems contain Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC)-mass satellites and tend to host more satellites compared to the MW itself. The radial distribution of SAGA satellites appears less concentrated than that of the MW's satellites. Additionally, the quenched fraction below 10^8.5 solar masses is lower in SAGA systems than in the MW; however, both cases show that the MW is within one sigma of SAGA's system-to-system scatter. Contrary to previous suggestions regarding corotating signals in MW/M31 satellite systems, SAGA satellites do not exhibit a clear pattern in this regard. These differences between the MW and typical SAGA systems can be reconciled if we consider that the MW is an older host with slightly less mass and recently accreted LMC/SMC system. In conclusion, this latest data release from the SAGA Survey provides valuable insights into satellite galaxy populations around Milky Way-mass galaxies and sheds light on key factors influencing their abundance and distribution within galactic systems.
Created on 05 Jun. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.