Hamiltonian and Liouvillian learning in weakly-dissipative quantum many-body systems

AI-generated keywords: Analog quantum simulation

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors Tobias Olsacher, Tristan Kraft, Christian Kokail, Barbara Kraus, and Peter Zoller focus on weakly dissipative many-body systems in analog quantum simulation.
  • They explore Hamiltonian and Liouvillian learning methods to decipher operator content.
  • Learning error initially decreases with the inverse square root of experimental runs due to shot noise dominance.
  • Eventually, learning error stabilizes at a constant level, aiding in identifying missing ansatz terms.
  • (Re-)parametrizing ans\"atze by manipulating parameter dependencies is a key technique for pinpointing relevant system parameters effectively.
  • The approach relies on classical post-processing methods, which is advantageous for dealing with limited experimental data availability.
  • The researchers apply their techniques to two experimentally relevant spin models to showcase efficacy and robustness in unraveling quantum dynamics within weakly-dissipative many-body systems.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Tobias Olsacher, Tristan Kraft, Christian Kokail, Barbara Kraus, Peter Zoller

arXiv: 2405.06768v2 - DOI (quant-ph)
20 pages, 9 figures

Abstract: We discuss Hamiltonian and Liouvillian learning for analog quantum simulation from non-equilibrium quench dynamics in the limit of weakly dissipative many-body systems. We present and compare various methods and strategies to learn the operator content of the Hamiltonian and the Lindblad operators of the Liouvillian. We compare different ans\"atze based on an experimentally accessible "learning error" which we consider as a function of the number of runs of the experiment. Initially, the learning error decreases with the inverse square root of the number of runs, as the error in the reconstructed parameters is dominated by shot noise. Eventually the learning error remains constant, allowing us to recognize missing ansatz terms. A central aspect of our approaches is to (re-)parametrize ans\"atze by introducing and varying the dependencies between parameters. This allows us to identify the relevant parameters of the system, thereby reducing the complexity of the learning task. Importantly, this (re-)parametrization relies solely on classical post-processing, which is compelling given the finite amount of data available from experiments. We illustrate and compare our methods with two experimentally relevant spin models.

Submitted to arXiv on 10 May. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2405.06768v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

, , , , In their paper titled "Hamiltonian and Liouvillian learning in weakly-dissipative quantum many-body systems," authors Tobias Olsacher, Tristan Kraft, Christian Kokail, Barbara Kraus, and Peter Zoller delve into the realm of analog quantum simulation from non-equilibrium quench dynamics. They focus on weakly dissipative many-body systems and explore the intricacies of Hamiltonian and Liouvillian learning. The researchers present a comprehensive analysis of various methods and strategies aimed at deciphering the operator content of the Hamiltonian and the Lindblad operators of the Liouvillian. This parameter is evaluated as a function of the number of experimental runs conducted. The authors observe an initial decrease in the learning error with the inverse square root of the number of runs, attributing this trend to shot noise dominating errors in reconstructed parameters. Interestingly, they note that eventually, the learning error stabilizes at a constant level, enabling them to identify missing ansatz terms within their models. A pivotal component of their approach involves (re-)parametrizing ans\"atze by introducing and manipulating dependencies between parameters. This innovative technique allows them to pinpoint relevant system parameters effectively, thereby streamlining the complexity associated with the learning task. Notably, this (re-)parametrization process relies solely on classical post-processing methods, which proves advantageous given the finite amount of data typically available from experimental setups. To illustrate and validate their methodologies, Olsacher et al. apply their techniques to two experimentally relevant spin models. Through detailed comparisons and analyses, they showcase the efficacy and robustness of their proposed approaches in unraveling intricate quantum dynamics within weakly-dissipative many-body systems. Overall, this research contributes valuable insights towards advancing analog quantum simulation techniques for studying non-equilibrium phenomena in complex quantum systems.
Created on 10 Aug. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.