AI summary · arXiv: 2407.01476v1 · cs.AI

Tree Search for Language Model Agents

Jing Yu Koh, Stephen McAleer, Daniel Fried, Ruslan Salakhutdinov
Original paper Submitted to arXiv on 01 Jul. 2024 11 pages. Models and code available at https://jykoh.com/search-agents License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

How to read this summary? Illustrated guide

The essentials

  • Authors address limitations of autonomous agents powered by language models (LMs) in decision-making tasks
  • LMs struggle with multi-step reasoning, planning, and utilizing environmental feedback for realistic computer tasks
  • Proposed inference-time search algorithm enables LM agents to conduct exploration and multi-step planning within interactive web environments
  • Approach involves implementing a best-first tree search algorithm directly within the environment space
  • Demonstrated effectiveness of search algorithm on GPT-4o agent on VisualWebArena benchmark, achieving significant success rate improvements
  • Incorporating search algorithm leads to competitive success rates on WebArena as well
  • Authors highlight benefits of employing search algorithms for web agents and discuss potential limitations and future research directions
  • Code and models developed as part of the study are publicly available at https://jykoh.com/search-agents

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Language Model Agents Decision-Making Tasks Web Automation Inference-Time Search Algorithm Interactive Web Environments

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
In their paper titled "Tree Search for Language Model Agents," authors Jing Yu Koh, Stephen McAleer, Daniel Fried, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov address the limitations of autonomous agents powered by language models (LMs) in performing decision-making tasks such as web automation. LMs excel in natural language understanding and generation but struggle with multi-step reasoning, planning, and utilizing environmental feedback when tackling realistic computer tasks. To overcome these challenges, the authors propose an inference-time search algorithm that enables LM agents to conduct exploration and multi-step planning within interactive web environments. Their approach involves implementing a best-first tree search algorithm that operates directly within the environment space. This method complements existing state-of-the-art agents and represents a novel strategy for enhancing the performance of LM agents on realistic web tasks. The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their search algorithm by applying it to a GPT-4o agent on the VisualWebArena benchmark. The results show a significant 39.7% relative increase in success rate compared to the baseline without search, achieving a state-of-the-art success rate of 26.4%. Similarly, on WebArena, incorporating the search algorithm leads to a 28.0% relative improvement over a baseline agent and achieves a competitive success rate of 19.2%. Through extensive experiments and analysis of their results, the authors highlight the benefits of employing search algorithms for web agents and emphasize how performance scales with increased test-time compute resources. They also discuss potential limitations and promising directions for future research in this area. The code and models developed as part of this study are publicly available at https://jykoh.com/search-agents. Overall,"Tree Search for Language Model Agents" presents a valuable contribution to advancing the capabilities of LM-powered autonomous agents in complex decision-making scenarios within interactive web environments.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts Citation alerts guide

Papers around this one

See them on a map

Ranked by how close their title and abstract are to this paper’s. Select some to read them together.

Closest papers

  1. Very close Another approach to the problem
    Language Agent Tree Search Unifies Reasoning Acting and Planning in Language Models
    Andy Zhou, Kai Yan, Michal Shlapentokh-Rothman et al. · 2023 · Artificial Intelligence · AI summary available

    Language Agent Tree Search combines LLM planning, acting, and reasoning with environment feedback, like this paper’s tree search for interactive web agents.

    Abstract

    While large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance on a range of decision-making tasks, they rely on simple acting processes and fall short of broad deployment as autonomous agents. We introduce LATS (Language Agent Tree Search), a general framework that synergizes the capabilities of LLMs in planning, acting, and reasoning. Drawing inspiration from Monte Carlo tree search in model-based reinforcement learning, LATS employs LLMs as agents, value functions, and optimizers, repurposing their latent strengths for enhanced decision-making. What is crucial in this method is the use of an environment for external feedback, which offers a more deliberate and adaptive proble…

  2. Very close Another approach to the problem
    Agent Q: Advanced Reasoning and Learning for Autonomous AI Agents
    Pranav Putta, Edmund Mills, Naman Garg et al. · 2024 · Artificial Intelligence · AI summary available

    Agent Q addresses multi-step reasoning in interactive web environments with a framework for agent learning and exploration, rather than inference-time tree search.

    Abstract

    Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in natural language tasks requiring complex reasoning, yet their application in agentic, multi-step reasoning within interactive environments remains a difficult challenge. Traditional supervised pre-training on static datasets falls short in enabling autonomous agent capabilities needed to perform complex decision-making in dynamic settings like web navigation. Previous attempts to bridge this ga-through supervised fine-tuning on curated expert demonstrations-often suffer from compounding errors and limited exploration data, resulting in sub-optimal policy outcomes. To overcome these challenges, we propose a framework that comb…

  3. Very close Broader context
    SimuRA: Towards General Goal-Oriented Agent via Simulative Reasoning Architecture with LLM-Based World Model
    Mingkai Deng, Jinyu Hou, Yilin Shen et al. · 2025 · Artificial Intelligence · AI summary available

    SimuRA uses an LLM-based world model to simulate actions and plans for goal-oriented agents, a broader planning approach than web-environment tree search.

    Abstract

    AI agents built on large language models (LLMs) hold enormous promise, but current practice focuses on a one-task-one-agent approach, which not only falls short of scalability and generality, but also suffers from the fundamental limitations of autoregressive LLMs. On the other hand, humans are general agents who reason by mentally simulating the outcomes of their actions and plans. Moving towards a more general and powerful AI agent, we introduce SimuRA, a goal-oriented architecture for generalized agentic reasoning. Based on a principled formulation of optimal agent in any environment, \modelname overcomes the limitations of autoregressive reasoning by introducing a world model for plannin…

  4. Close Same method, another problem
    SELA: Tree-Search Enhanced LLM Agents for Automated Machine Learning
    Yizhou Chi, Yizhang Lin, Sirui Hong et al. · 2024 · Artificial Intelligence · AI summary available

    SELA applies Monte Carlo tree search to LLM agents, but uses it to optimize automated machine-learning pipelines rather than web tasks.

    Abstract

    Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) approaches encompass traditional methods that optimize fixed pipelines for model selection and ensembling, as well as newer LLM-based frameworks that autonomously build pipelines. While LLM-based agents have shown promise in automating machine learning tasks, they often generate low-diversity and suboptimal code, even after multiple iterations. To overcome these limitations, we introduce Tree-Search Enhanced LLM Agents (SELA), an innovative agent-based system that leverages Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to optimize the AutoML process. By representing pipeline configurations as trees, our framework enables agents to conduct experiments intelligently and it…

  5. Close Same question
    AgentOccam: A Simple Yet Strong Baseline for LLM-Based Web Agents
    Ke Yang, Yao Liu, Sapana Chaudhary et al. · 2024 · Artificial Intelligence · AI summary available

    AgentOccam studies LLM-based agents for automated web tasks, focusing on a simple baseline rather than inference-time tree search.

    Abstract

    Autonomy via agents using large language models (LLMs) for personalized, standardized tasks boosts human efficiency. Automating web tasks (like booking hotels within a budget) is increasingly sought after. Fulfilling practical needs, the web agent also serves as an important proof-of-concept example for various agent grounding scenarios, with its success promising advancements in many future applications. Prior research often handcrafts web agent strategies (e.g., prompting templates, multi-agent systems, search methods, etc.) and the corresponding in-context examples, which may not generalize well across all real-world scenarios. On the other hand, there has been limited study on the misali…

  6. Close Review
    A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agents
    Lei Wang, Chen Ma, Xueyang Feng et al. · 2023 · Artificial Intelligence · AI summary available

    A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agents reviews architectures and research on LLM-driven autonomous agents.

    Abstract

    Autonomous agents have long been a prominent research topic in the academic community. Previous research in this field often focuses on training agents with limited knowledge within isolated environments, which diverges significantly from the human learning processes, and thus makes the agents hard to achieve human-like decisions. Recently, through the acquisition of vast amounts of web knowledge, large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable potential in achieving human-level intelligence. This has sparked an upsurge in studies investigating autonomous agents based on LLMs. To harness the full potential of LLMs, researchers have devised diverse agent architectures tailored to di…

  7. Close Broader context
    Automating Thought of Search: A Journey Towards Soundness and Completeness
    Daniel Cao, Michael Katz, Harsha Kokel et al. · 2024 · Artificial Intelligence · AI summary available

    Automating Thought of Search studies LLM-guided planning and search, using generated code and human input to define a sound search space.

    Abstract

    Planning remains one of the last standing bastions for large language models (LLMs), which now turn their attention to search. Most of the literature uses the language models as world models to define the search space, forgoing soundness for the sake of flexibility. A recent work, Thought of Search (ToS), proposed defining the search space with code, having the language models produce that code. ToS requires a human in the loop, collaboratively producing a sound successor function and goal test. The result, however, is worth the effort: all the tested datasets were solved with 100% accuracy. At the same time LLMs have demonstrated significant progress in code generation and refinement for co…

  8. Close Broader context
    AutoAgents: A Framework for Automatic Agent Generation
    Guangyao Chen, Siwei Dong, Yu Shu et al. · 2023 · Artificial Intelligence · AI summary available

    AutoAgents generates and coordinates specialized agents for varied tasks, addressing adaptable task solving rather than web-agent tree search.

    Abstract

    Large language models (LLMs) have enabled remarkable advances in automated task-solving with multi-agent systems. However, most existing LLM-based multi-agent approaches rely on predefined agents to handle simple tasks, limiting the adaptability of multi-agent collaboration to different scenarios. Therefore, we introduce AutoAgents, an innovative framework that adaptively generates and coordinates multiple specialized agents to build an AI team according to different tasks. Specifically, AutoAgents couples the relationship between tasks and roles by dynamically generating multiple required agents based on task content and planning solutions for the current task based on the generated expert …

How are these papers found?

We compare the title and abstract of this paper with those of every paper summarized on this site, and with the papers Semantic Scholar recommends, those it cites and those citing it (for a much-cited paper, its most recent citations and, from OpenAlex, the most cited ones). Among the prior work and the follow-ups, the papers that use each other in depth, a method it uses and the much-cited follow-ups come a little higher. The levels (very close, close, related) come from the similarity of the texts, not from a judgment of quality; * marks a paper without an abstract, compared by its title. The sentence under a paper is written by an AI from the two abstracts: check it in the papers. A paper marked not relevant by three readers leaves the list.

For now only among the papers summarized on this site: search again to add the prior work, the follow-ups and Semantic Scholar’s recommendations.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.