AI summary · arXiv: 2407.01476v1 · cs.AI
Tree Search for Language Model Agents
The essentials
- Authors address limitations of autonomous agents powered by language models (LMs) in decision-making tasks
- LMs struggle with multi-step reasoning, planning, and utilizing environmental feedback for realistic computer tasks
- Proposed inference-time search algorithm enables LM agents to conduct exploration and multi-step planning within interactive web environments
- Approach involves implementing a best-first tree search algorithm directly within the environment space
- Demonstrated effectiveness of search algorithm on GPT-4o agent on VisualWebArena benchmark, achieving significant success rate improvements
- Incorporating search algorithm leads to competitive success rates on WebArena as well
- Authors highlight benefits of employing search algorithms for web agents and discuss potential limitations and future research directions
- Code and models developed as part of the study are publicly available at https://jykoh.com/search-agents
Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
How to chat with this paper? Illustrated guide
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Keep this conversation — a free account saves your questions and answers, your collections of papers and your alerts.
Create a free accountTools for this paper
Advanced tools Premium
For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium
Papers around this one
See them on a mapRanked by how close their title and abstract are to this paper’s. Select some to read them together.
Closest papers
-
Language Agent Tree Search Unifies Reasoning Acting and Planning in Language ModelsAndy Zhou, Kai Yan, Michal Shlapentokh-Rothman et al. · 2023 · Artificial Intelligence · AI summary available
Language Agent Tree Search combines LLM planning, acting, and reasoning with environment feedback, like this paper’s tree search for interactive web agents.
Abstract
While large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance on a range of decision-making tasks, they rely on simple acting processes and fall short of broad deployment as autonomous agents. We introduce LATS (Language Agent Tree Search), a general framework that synergizes the capabilities of LLMs in planning, acting, and reasoning. Drawing inspiration from Monte Carlo tree search in model-based reinforcement learning, LATS employs LLMs as agents, value functions, and optimizers, repurposing their latent strengths for enhanced decision-making. What is crucial in this method is the use of an environment for external feedback, which offers a more deliberate and adaptive proble…
-
Agent Q: Advanced Reasoning and Learning for Autonomous AI AgentsPranav Putta, Edmund Mills, Naman Garg et al. · 2024 · Artificial Intelligence · AI summary available
Agent Q addresses multi-step reasoning in interactive web environments with a framework for agent learning and exploration, rather than inference-time tree search.
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in natural language tasks requiring complex reasoning, yet their application in agentic, multi-step reasoning within interactive environments remains a difficult challenge. Traditional supervised pre-training on static datasets falls short in enabling autonomous agent capabilities needed to perform complex decision-making in dynamic settings like web navigation. Previous attempts to bridge this ga-through supervised fine-tuning on curated expert demonstrations-often suffer from compounding errors and limited exploration data, resulting in sub-optimal policy outcomes. To overcome these challenges, we propose a framework that comb…
-
SimuRA: Towards General Goal-Oriented Agent via Simulative Reasoning Architecture with LLM-Based World ModelMingkai Deng, Jinyu Hou, Yilin Shen et al. · 2025 · Artificial Intelligence · AI summary available
SimuRA uses an LLM-based world model to simulate actions and plans for goal-oriented agents, a broader planning approach than web-environment tree search.
Abstract
AI agents built on large language models (LLMs) hold enormous promise, but current practice focuses on a one-task-one-agent approach, which not only falls short of scalability and generality, but also suffers from the fundamental limitations of autoregressive LLMs. On the other hand, humans are general agents who reason by mentally simulating the outcomes of their actions and plans. Moving towards a more general and powerful AI agent, we introduce SimuRA, a goal-oriented architecture for generalized agentic reasoning. Based on a principled formulation of optimal agent in any environment, \modelname overcomes the limitations of autoregressive reasoning by introducing a world model for plannin…
-
SELA: Tree-Search Enhanced LLM Agents for Automated Machine LearningYizhou Chi, Yizhang Lin, Sirui Hong et al. · 2024 · Artificial Intelligence · AI summary available
SELA applies Monte Carlo tree search to LLM agents, but uses it to optimize automated machine-learning pipelines rather than web tasks.
Abstract
Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) approaches encompass traditional methods that optimize fixed pipelines for model selection and ensembling, as well as newer LLM-based frameworks that autonomously build pipelines. While LLM-based agents have shown promise in automating machine learning tasks, they often generate low-diversity and suboptimal code, even after multiple iterations. To overcome these limitations, we introduce Tree-Search Enhanced LLM Agents (SELA), an innovative agent-based system that leverages Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to optimize the AutoML process. By representing pipeline configurations as trees, our framework enables agents to conduct experiments intelligently and it…
-
AgentOccam: A Simple Yet Strong Baseline for LLM-Based Web AgentsKe Yang, Yao Liu, Sapana Chaudhary et al. · 2024 · Artificial Intelligence · AI summary available
AgentOccam studies LLM-based agents for automated web tasks, focusing on a simple baseline rather than inference-time tree search.
Abstract
Autonomy via agents using large language models (LLMs) for personalized, standardized tasks boosts human efficiency. Automating web tasks (like booking hotels within a budget) is increasingly sought after. Fulfilling practical needs, the web agent also serves as an important proof-of-concept example for various agent grounding scenarios, with its success promising advancements in many future applications. Prior research often handcrafts web agent strategies (e.g., prompting templates, multi-agent systems, search methods, etc.) and the corresponding in-context examples, which may not generalize well across all real-world scenarios. On the other hand, there has been limited study on the misali…
-
A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous AgentsLei Wang, Chen Ma, Xueyang Feng et al. · 2023 · Artificial Intelligence · AI summary available
A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agents reviews architectures and research on LLM-driven autonomous agents.
Abstract
Autonomous agents have long been a prominent research topic in the academic community. Previous research in this field often focuses on training agents with limited knowledge within isolated environments, which diverges significantly from the human learning processes, and thus makes the agents hard to achieve human-like decisions. Recently, through the acquisition of vast amounts of web knowledge, large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable potential in achieving human-level intelligence. This has sparked an upsurge in studies investigating autonomous agents based on LLMs. To harness the full potential of LLMs, researchers have devised diverse agent architectures tailored to di…
-
Automating Thought of Search: A Journey Towards Soundness and CompletenessDaniel Cao, Michael Katz, Harsha Kokel et al. · 2024 · Artificial Intelligence · AI summary available
Automating Thought of Search studies LLM-guided planning and search, using generated code and human input to define a sound search space.
Abstract
Planning remains one of the last standing bastions for large language models (LLMs), which now turn their attention to search. Most of the literature uses the language models as world models to define the search space, forgoing soundness for the sake of flexibility. A recent work, Thought of Search (ToS), proposed defining the search space with code, having the language models produce that code. ToS requires a human in the loop, collaboratively producing a sound successor function and goal test. The result, however, is worth the effort: all the tested datasets were solved with 100% accuracy. At the same time LLMs have demonstrated significant progress in code generation and refinement for co…
-
AutoAgents: A Framework for Automatic Agent GenerationGuangyao Chen, Siwei Dong, Yu Shu et al. · 2023 · Artificial Intelligence · AI summary available
AutoAgents generates and coordinates specialized agents for varied tasks, addressing adaptable task solving rather than web-agent tree search.
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have enabled remarkable advances in automated task-solving with multi-agent systems. However, most existing LLM-based multi-agent approaches rely on predefined agents to handle simple tasks, limiting the adaptability of multi-agent collaboration to different scenarios. Therefore, we introduce AutoAgents, an innovative framework that adaptively generates and coordinates multiple specialized agents to build an AI team according to different tasks. Specifically, AutoAgents couples the relationship between tasks and roles by dynamically generating multiple required agents based on task content and planning solutions for the current task based on the generated expert …
Go further
How are these papers found?
We compare the title and abstract of this paper with those of every paper summarized on this site, and with the papers Semantic Scholar recommends, those it cites and those citing it (for a much-cited paper, its most recent citations and, from OpenAlex, the most cited ones). Among the prior work and the follow-ups, the papers that use each other in depth, a method it uses and the much-cited follow-ups come a little higher. The levels (very close, close, related) come from the similarity of the texts, not from a judgment of quality; * marks a paper without an abstract, compared by its title. The sentence under a paper is written by an AI from the two abstracts: check it in the papers. A paper marked not relevant by three readers leaves the list.
For now only among the papers summarized on this site: search again to add the prior work, the follow-ups and Semantic Scholar’s recommendations.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.