Don't Do RAG: When Cache-Augmented Generation is All You Need for Knowledge Tasks

AI-generated keywords: Long-context Large Language Models (LLMs)

AI-generated Key Points

  • Significant advancements in long-context Large Language Models (LLMs) have been made in recent years
  • LLMs can process and reason over extensive textual inputs, assimilating vast amounts of information in a single inference step
  • State-of-the-art long-context models like GPT-01, GPT-4, and Claude 3.5 outperform traditional systems in processing large amounts of retrieved data
  • Cache-augmented generation (CAG) is proposed as a new paradigm to address challenges posed by traditional Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems
  • CAG involves preloading all relevant resources into the LLM's extended context during inference to eliminate retrieval latency and minimize errors
  • Long-context LLMs outperform RAG in terms of efficiency and accuracy in scenarios with limited and manageable knowledge bases
  • The paper provides insights into when and why CAG may serve as an alternative to RAG for knowledge integration tasks
  • Contributions include introducing a Retrieval-Free Long-Context Paradigm using long-context LLMs with preloaded documents and caches to eliminate retrieval latency and system complexity
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Brian J Chan, Chao-Ting Chen, Jui-Hung Cheng, Hen-Hsen Huang

License: CC BY-SA 4.0

Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has gained traction as a powerful approach for enhancing language models by integrating external knowledge sources. However, RAG introduces challenges such as retrieval latency, potential errors in document selection, and increased system complexity. With the advent of large language models (LLMs) featuring significantly extended context windows, this paper proposes an alternative paradigm, cache-augmented generation (CAG) that bypasses real-time retrieval. Our method involves preloading all relevant resources, especially when the documents or knowledge for retrieval are of a limited and manageable size, into the LLM's extended context and caching its runtime parameters. During inference, the model utilizes these preloaded parameters to answer queries without additional retrieval steps. Comparative analyses reveal that CAG eliminates retrieval latency and minimizes retrieval errors while maintaining context relevance. Performance evaluations across multiple benchmarks highlight scenarios where long-context LLMs either outperform or complement traditional RAG pipelines. These findings suggest that, for certain applications, particularly those with a constrained knowledge base, CAG provide a streamlined and efficient alternative to RAG, achieving comparable or superior results with reduced complexity.

Submitted to arXiv on 20 Dec. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2412.15605v1

, , , , Over the past few years, significant advancements have been made in long-context Large Language Models (LLMs), allowing them to process and reason over extensive textual inputs. These models can now assimilate vast amounts of information in a single inference step, making them ideal for tasks such as document comprehension, multi-turn dialogue, and summarization of lengthy texts. This capability eliminates the need for real-time retrieval as all necessary information can be preloaded into the model. Recent studies have shown that state-of-the-art long-context models like GPT-01, GPT-4, and Claude 3.5 can effectively process large amounts of retrieved data, outperforming traditional systems in many scenarios. It has been demonstrated that as long as all documents fit within the extended context length, traditional Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems can be replaced by these long-context models. To address the challenges posed by RAG systems such as retrieval latency and potential errors in document selection, a new paradigm called cache-augmented generation (CAG) is proposed. CAG involves preloading all relevant resources into the LLM's extended context during inference, eliminating the need for real-time retrieval. Comparative analyses have shown that CAG eliminates retrieval latency and minimizes errors while maintaining context relevance. Through a series of experiments comparing traditional RAG workflows with CAG, it has been identified that long-context LLMs outperform RAG in terms of efficiency and accuracy in scenarios where knowledge bases are limited and manageable. The paper aims to provide insights into when and why CAG may serve as a streamlined alternative to RAG for knowledge integration tasks. The contributions of this research include introducing a Retrieval-Free Long-Context Paradigm using long-context LLMs with preloaded documents and caches to eliminate retrieval latency and system complexity. Extensive performance comparisons have shown instances where long-context LLMs outperform traditional RAG systems, especially with manageable knowledge bases. Practical insights have also been provided on optimizing knowledge-intensive workflows using retrieval-free methods for specific applications. The CAG framework developed through this research is publicly available for further exploration and implementation.
Created on 16 Jan. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.