In-depth Analysis of Graph-based RAG in a Unified Framework

AI-generated keywords: Graph-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)

AI-generated Key Points

  • Authors present a comprehensive evaluation and comparison of existing graph-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) methods
  • Introduce a unified framework that simplifies complex operations into key components
  • Systematically evaluate and compare existing RAG methods using various datasets for specific and abstract question-answering tasks
  • Develop new variations by combining existing techniques to improve performance surpassing state-of-the-art methods
  • Set up an open-source testbed for graph-based RAG methods, implementing 12 representative methods within the same framework
  • Testbed allows fine-grained comparisons over retrieval stage building blocks with over 100 variants and evaluates performance across 11 real-world datasets encompassing specific and abstract questions
  • Provide detailed statistics on token numbers, question types, and dataset characteristics for both specific and abstract QA tasks
  • Identify critical components affecting performance of graph-based RAG methods through extensive experimental results
  • Offer valuable insights into the behavior of existing graph-based RAG methods
  • Propose practical research opportunities based on findings to facilitate future studies in integrating external knowledge into large language models through graph-based approaches
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Yingli Zhou, Yaodong Su, Youran Sun, Shu Wang, Taotao Wang, Runyuan He, Yongwei Zhang, Sicong Liang, Xilin Liu, Yuchi Ma, Yixiang Fang

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Graph-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has proven effective in integrating external knowledge into large language models (LLMs), improving their factual accuracy, adaptability, interpretability, and trustworthiness. A number of graph-based RAG methods have been proposed in the literature. However, these methods have not been systematically and comprehensively compared under the same experimental settings. In this paper, we first summarize a unified framework to incorporate all graph-based RAG methods from a high-level perspective. We then extensively compare representative graph-based RAG methods over a range of questing-answering (QA) datasets -- from specific questions to abstract questions -- and examine the effectiveness of all methods, providing a thorough analysis of graph-based RAG approaches. As a byproduct of our experimental analysis, we are also able to identify new variants of the graph-based RAG methods over specific QA and abstract QA tasks respectively, by combining existing techniques, which outperform the state-of-the-art methods. Finally, based on these findings, we offer promising research opportunities. We believe that a deeper understanding of the behavior of existing methods can provide new valuable insights for future research.

Submitted to arXiv on 06 Mar. 2025

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2503.04338v1

In this paper, the authors present a comprehensive evaluation and comparison of existing graph-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) methods. They introduce a unified framework that encompasses all current graph-based RAG methods, simplifying complex operations into key components. Through thorough analysis and comparison under this framework, the authors systematically evaluate these methods using various datasets for specific and abstract question-answering tasks. Additionally, they develop new variations by combining existing techniques, resulting in improved performance surpassing state-of-the-art methods. : The authors provide a thorough evaluation and comparison of existing RAG methods within a unified framework. They also set up an open-source testbed for graph-based RAG methods, implementing 12 representative methods within the same framework. This testbed allows for fine-grained comparisons over retrieval stage building blocks with over 100 variants and evaluates performance across 11 real-world datasets encompassing specific and abstract questions. Specific questions focus on detail-oriented queries referencing specific entities within the graph, while abstract questions involve broader conceptual inquiries that require high-level understanding. Moreover, to ensure consistency and quality in their experiments, the authors generate questions for abstract QA datasets using GPT-4o. They provide detailed statistics on token numbers, question types, and dataset characteristics for both specific and abstract QA tasks. Through their extensive experimental results, the authors identify critical components affecting performance and offer valuable insights into the behavior of existing graph-based RAG methods. They also propose practical research opportunities based on their findings to facilitate future studies in this field. : The authors introduce a unified framework for graph-based RAG methods, simplifying complex operations into key components. : The authors systematically evaluate and compare existing graph-based RAG methods using various datasets, providing valuable insights into their performance. : The authors set up an open-source testbed for graph-based RAG methods, allowing for fine-grained comparisons and evaluations across multiple datasets. : The authors aim to enhance understanding of existing methods and inspire new avenues for research in effectively integrating external knowledge into large language models through graph-based approaches.
Created on 27 Mar. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.