In-depth Analysis of Graph-based RAG in a Unified Framework
AI-generated Key Points
- Authors present a comprehensive evaluation and comparison of existing graph-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) methods
- Introduce a unified framework that simplifies complex operations into key components
- Systematically evaluate and compare existing RAG methods using various datasets for specific and abstract question-answering tasks
- Develop new variations by combining existing techniques to improve performance surpassing state-of-the-art methods
- Set up an open-source testbed for graph-based RAG methods, implementing 12 representative methods within the same framework
- Testbed allows fine-grained comparisons over retrieval stage building blocks with over 100 variants and evaluates performance across 11 real-world datasets encompassing specific and abstract questions
- Provide detailed statistics on token numbers, question types, and dataset characteristics for both specific and abstract QA tasks
- Identify critical components affecting performance of graph-based RAG methods through extensive experimental results
- Offer valuable insights into the behavior of existing graph-based RAG methods
- Propose practical research opportunities based on findings to facilitate future studies in integrating external knowledge into large language models through graph-based approaches
Authors: Yingli Zhou, Yaodong Su, Youran Sun, Shu Wang, Taotao Wang, Runyuan He, Yongwei Zhang, Sicong Liang, Xilin Liu, Yuchi Ma, Yixiang Fang
Abstract: Graph-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has proven effective in integrating external knowledge into large language models (LLMs), improving their factual accuracy, adaptability, interpretability, and trustworthiness. A number of graph-based RAG methods have been proposed in the literature. However, these methods have not been systematically and comprehensively compared under the same experimental settings. In this paper, we first summarize a unified framework to incorporate all graph-based RAG methods from a high-level perspective. We then extensively compare representative graph-based RAG methods over a range of questing-answering (QA) datasets -- from specific questions to abstract questions -- and examine the effectiveness of all methods, providing a thorough analysis of graph-based RAG approaches. As a byproduct of our experimental analysis, we are also able to identify new variants of the graph-based RAG methods over specific QA and abstract QA tasks respectively, by combining existing techniques, which outperform the state-of-the-art methods. Finally, based on these findings, we offer promising research opportunities. We believe that a deeper understanding of the behavior of existing methods can provide new valuable insights for future research.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.